Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

staged fascism wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Of course, I'm not saying that Trump is as bad as Hitler. But this is still early days and Trump has shown that he doesn't mind committing atrocities like stealing children. He even seems to relish it.

Hitler did not become the monster he became suddenly. The morphed over time. If you look back how Hitler achieved power by hate mongering it eerily follows what Trump is doing, and what other dictator types have done.

The question is - if trump is faced with decisions that start to involve possible loss of a great number of lives what will he do? Since he has displayed no moral compass at all to date, over his whole life, the easiest assumption is that he wouldn’t be guided by empathy or any kind of moral principle, especially if persona gain is involved. He has openly voiced his resistance to learning lessons, taking back statements or apologizing for his actions. His lack of intelligence is another great worry.

Trollminator wrote:

staged fascism wrote:

Hitler did not become the monster he became suddenly. The morphed over time. If you look back how Hitler achieved power by hate mongering it eerily follows what Trump is doing, and what other dictator types have done.

The question is - if trump is faced with decisions that start to involve possible loss of a great number of lives what will he do? Since he has displayed no moral compass at all to date, over his whole life, the easiest assumption is that he wouldn’t be guided by empathy or any kind of moral principle, especially if persona gain is involved. He has openly voiced his resistance to learning lessons, taking back statements or apologizing for his actions. His lack of intelligence is another great worry.

Oh yeah and that not only is he unchecked right now, he’s fully endorsed by his ruling party.

Trumpers target Trump haters wrote:

agip wrote:

the reason we know a trumpist sent the bombs is because Brennan is a CNBC contributor, not a CNN contributor.

That special kind of moranity just shines out 'vote trump'

Another bomb package was sent to Debbie Wasserman Schultz; Florida Democrat, House Member, and former DNC chair.

Add yet another bomb package was sent to Dem Eric Holder.

AND add that all of the packages had return addresses of Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

Trumpers target Trump haters wrote:

Trumpers target Trump haters wrote:

Another bomb package was sent to Debbie Wasserman Schultz; Florida Democrat, House Member, and former DNC chair.

Add yet another bomb package was sent to Dem Eric Holder.

AND add that all of the packages had return addresses of Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

AND another bomb package was sent to Kamala Harris at an office she has in San Diego.

Trollminator wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

The question is - if trump is faced with decisions that start to involve possible loss of a great number of lives what will he do? Since he has displayed no moral compass at all to date, over his whole life, the easiest assumption is that he wouldn’t be guided by empathy or any kind of moral principle, especially if persona gain is involved. He has openly voiced his resistance to learning lessons, taking back statements or apologizing for his actions. His lack of intelligence is another great worry.

Oh yeah and that not only is he unchecked right now, he’s fully endorsed by his ruling party.

trump will try to make a buck off whatever conflict we have, and he won't fight anyone who gives him money.

trump has told us that is how he makes decisions - whoever gives him the most money gets his loyalty. He tells us this.

Trumpers target Trump haters wrote:

Trumpers target Trump haters wrote:

Add yet another bomb package was sent to Dem Eric Holder.

AND add that all of the packages had return addresses of Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

AND another bomb package was sent to Kamala Harris at an office she has in San Diego.

Whomever sent these should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. No question about it.

But if you were a Dem and you weren't sent one (I'm looking at you Corey Booker), do you consider yourself not an A-lister?

Got Directly to Jail wrote:

Trumpers target Trump haters wrote:

AND another bomb package was sent to Kamala Harris at an office she has in San Diego.

Whomever sent these should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. No question about it.

But if you were a Dem and you weren't sent one (I'm looking at you Corey Booker), do you consider yourself not an A-lister?

Good observation.

Radio silence from trumpers today

Trollminator wrote:

Got Directly to Jail wrote:

Whomever sent these should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. No question about it.

But if you were a Dem and you weren't sent one (I'm looking at you Corey Booker), do you consider yourself not an A-lister?

Good observation.

Radio silence from trumpers today

No doubt this person(s) should be prosecuted.

Hillary Clinton

Barack Obama,

George Soros,

John Brennan

Eric Holder

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz

Kamala Harris

Hmmmmm.

No Along Party Lines wrote:

https: //

www.cnn.com

/ 2018/10/18/politics/utah-ricin-letters-william-clyde-allen/index.html

^ typical trumpette. therefore it is okay to send bombs to dems because . . .

The appropriate response to any Republican official who claims they'll protect people with pre-existing conditions should be to laugh in their face. Here's a nice montage of Republican pundits telling us how they really view this issue.

https://twitter.com/benwikler/status/1055130744165666818

Here's a video of a bunch of Republicans who have tried their darnedest to repeal coverage for people with pre-existing conditions saying that they'll protect them now if re-elected! Promise!

https://twitter.com/MaddowBlog/status/1054910737213255681/video/1

The Gallant Pig Man wrote:

The appropriate response to any Republican official who claims they'll protect people with pre-existing conditions should be to laugh in their face. Here's a nice montage of Republican pundits telling us how they really view this issue.

https://twitter.com/benwikler/status/1055130744165666818

Here's a video of a bunch of Republicans who have tried their darnedest to repeal coverage for people with pre-existing conditions saying that they'll protect them now if re-elected! Promise!

https://twitter.com/MaddowBlog/status/1054910737213255681/video/1

Nice.

The politics of fear at its finest.

Don't forget that granny is going to be eating cat food because hey are taking away Social Security benefits too.

Crooked Donald. Lock him up.

The Gallant Pig Man wrote:

The appropriate response to any Republican official who claims they'll protect people with pre-existing conditions should be to laugh in their face. Here's a nice montage of Republican pundits telling us how they really view this issue.

https://twitter.com/benwikler/status/1055130744165666818

Here's a video of a bunch of Republicans who have tried their darnedest to repeal coverage for people with pre-existing conditions saying that they'll protect them now if re-elected! Promise!

https://twitter.com/MaddowBlog/status/1054910737213255681/video/1

What? People can't change their minds on issues?

Mental Debate wrote:

The Gallant Pig Man wrote:

The appropriate response to any Republican official who claims they'll protect people with pre-existing conditions should be to laugh in their face. Here's a nice montage of Republican pundits telling us how they really view this issue.

https://twitter.com/benwikler/status/1055130744165666818

Here's a video of a bunch of Republicans who have tried their darnedest to repeal coverage for people with pre-existing conditions saying that they'll protect them now if re-elected! Promise!

https://twitter.com/MaddowBlog/status/1054910737213255681/video/1

What? People can't change their minds on issues?

Sure, but do you believe that they have changed their minds?

Some of these Republicans are still directly involved in the lawsuit to get rid of pre-existing condition coverage. They refuse to withdrawal from the suit.

So they are fighting like crazy to get rid of your health care at the same time they say they want to protect it.

Fat hurts wrote:

Mental Debate wrote:

What? People can't change their minds on issues?

Sure, but do you believe that they have changed their minds?

Some of these Republicans are still directly involved in the lawsuit to get rid of pre-existing condition coverage. They refuse to withdrawal from the suit.

So they are fighting like crazy to get rid of your health care at the same time they say they want to protect it.

I have no reason not believe them.

Mental Debate wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Sure, but do you believe that they have changed their minds?

Some of these Republicans are still directly involved in the lawsuit to get rid of pre-existing condition coverage. They refuse to withdrawal from the suit.

So they are fighting like crazy to get rid of your health care at the same time they say they want to protect it.

I have no reason not believe them.

I just gave you one.

Mental Debate wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Sure, but do you believe that they have changed their minds?

Some of these Republicans are still directly involved in the lawsuit to get rid of pre-existing condition coverage. They refuse to withdrawal from the suit.

So they are fighting like crazy to get rid of your health care at the same time they say they want to protect it.

I have no reason not believe them.

Then you must hate them. You voted for tRump because DESTROY the ACA. Many Repubs are in defiance of the "president".