This is a running website
Go somewhere else to shout into the abyss. No one on this thread is convincing anyone of anything. No one comes to letsrun to be convinced out of their deeply entrenched political beliefs. You are accomplishing nothing by posting here.
LOLLL AT LIBTURDSs.!!
Hey - off topic can you Trump bros fund my new venture?
dude who cut your hair wrote:
Truuuth wrote:LEARN that the mainstream media was- and is- lying to you on a daily basis.
Please post specific examples or shut your pie hole.
Or were you referring to Fox news?
https://www.buzzfeed.com/alexcampbell/seth-rich-family-refutes-report?utm_term=.csmJJEqlva#.olk66YGPKlmcmaster just went in front of the press again... and again he did not deny that Trump handed over classified information to Russian intelligence officers.
now trumpers...your turn. What do you say to someone who hands over classified information to hostile nations? What do you say?
eric a blair wrote:
mcmaster just went in front of the press again... and again he did not deny that Trump handed over classified information to Russian intelligence officers.
now trumpers...your turn. What do you say to someone who hands over classified information to hostile nations? What do you say?
McMaster actually seemed to be stonewalling. He took very few questions and we really learned only one new thing. That new thing is that, apparently, Trump passed on this intelligence to the Russians without consulting anyone else. He just did it on a whim.
This is pure recklessness. Trump can not be trusted with sensitive information.
Another thing I've been wondering about is the Russian reporters that were allowed to attend. Were those Russian reporters and photographers also present when Trump was disclosing this information?
Fat hurts wrote:
Another thing I've been wondering about is the Russian reporters that were allowed to attend. Were those Russian reporters and photographers also present when Trump was disclosing this information?
Hey look- you guys are creating your own echo chamber again! LOL
Fat hurts wrote:
I honestly don't want to believe the Washington Post story. I don't want it to be true.
McMaster read a short, carefully-worded statement. The statement did not deny the details of the WaPo report, but said the story "as reported is false". So what does does the story get wrong and what does it get right?
But McMaster refused to take questions after reading his statement.
The mere presence of McMaster as spokesperson will be enough for many to conclude that the story is completely bogus.
I'll wait and see. I hope Trump didn't do this.
Remember, it's not Trump's or his admin's incompetence or ill intentions that are ever a problem, it's the media!!! They are focusing too much on these non-issues, they should be like, praising him on a daily basis for being a God and having beat Hillary. I admit I thought I'd be in for 4-8 years of very annoying politics and news, but this is just getting better and better. It's truly awesome to watch Trump and his clown car passengers scramble every time they fvck up and we hear about it. It's like they never thought they'd have to explain any of their bad moves to anyone. If you are a public servant you have to be held accountable, by your peers, citizens, the media and any other stakeholder. Trump doesn't want any transparency, must be great to just think and act like a dictator... obviously he still doesn't understand what his job is all about.
"minority" wrote:
Truuuth wrote:Trump won white college grads 50-45%.
Trump won white women. Say that again- he won white women.
Trump won every income group over $50K.
Trump won 30% of Hispanics.
Trump won 13% of black men.
Less than 50% is winning? Sweet I won second to last place in my race last week.
Your attempt at trying to draw a logical comparison is hilarious. Let me guess, Art History major? English?
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
If saying "MAGA" triggers you, then so be it.
MAGA!!!
Unfortunately for you, it does not.
What it does do is identify you as a 12 year-old.
Truuuth wrote:
finally starting to show wrote:Yeah, but everyone agrees Trump's base = old, poor white men from rural areas. FACT.
You're clearly not a "data" person. Rural areas of the US represent just 15% of the overall population. Roughly half of that figure are men (so let's say 7.5%). But not every man in a rural area in the US is white. But let's assume "most" are. That equates to roughly 6% of the population that YOU are saying is "Trump's base." Don't you think the focus on demonizing that small group was stupid?
That's the equivalent of saying "Black females" were Clinton's base. Stupid, right? Inconsequential, right? Yes, and yes.
After experiencing such an epic defeat because of bumbled strategy and focus on inaccurate identity politics-driven poll figures, you still haven't learned.
Trump won white college grads 50-45%.
Trump won white women. Say that again- he won white women.
Trump won every income group over $50K.
Trump won 30% of Hispanics.
Trump won 13% of black men.
Deal with it. Not only deal with it, but LEARN from your mistakes. LEARN what you were fooled into believing prior to the election. LEARN that the mainstream media was- and is- lying to you on a daily basis. LEARN man, learn. You only have so much time on this planet, man, LEARN!!
Good rambling. No one who voted for Hillary was fooled into believing she was going to win, that's why they felt they still needed to vote. HRC and team fvcked up, they're ground game was soft and they assumed they would retain a lot of Obama's county victories. The MSM has nothing to do with that. HRC needed to visit these places and connect with people more intimately. She needed to adapt her boring and stiff style to energize the Bernie voters. She failed. Trump did something unorthodox, but that also had to do with less funding than he expected. He went for the low hanging fruit and used Twitter, a much cheaper but effective communication method. So you can debate why someone might have voted for him vs her, but you can't debate they voted for him because they thought he was qualified and would be a good public servant. If anything, the MSM helped him by giving him so much air time. That for sure was a disadvantage for Dems. You need to get over Nov 8 and the MSM conspiracy. He is almost half a year into his term and you refuse to talk about his track record. You are just a braindead minion.
TroLLminator wrote:
Truuuth wrote:You're clearly not a "data" person. Rural areas of the US represent just 15% of the overall population. Roughly half of that figure are men (so let's say 7.5%). But not every man in a rural area in the US is white. But let's assume "most" are. That equates to roughly 6% of the population that YOU are saying is "Trump's base." Don't you think the focus on demonizing that small group was stupid?
That's the equivalent of saying "Black females" were Clinton's base. Stupid, right? Inconsequential, right? Yes, and yes.
After experiencing such an epic defeat because of bumbled strategy and focus on inaccurate identity politics-driven poll figures, you still haven't learned.
Trump won white college grads 50-45%.
Trump won white women. Say that again- he won white women.
Trump won every income group over $50K.
Trump won 30% of Hispanics.
Trump won 13% of black men.
Deal with it. Not only deal with it, but LEARN from your mistakes. LEARN what you were fooled into believing prior to the election. LEARN that the mainstream media was- and is- lying to you on a daily basis. LEARN man, learn. You only have so much time on this planet, man, LEARN!!
Good rambling. No one who voted for Hillary was fooled into believing she was going to win, that's why they felt they still needed to vote. HRC and team fvcked up, they're ground game was soft and they assumed they would retain a lot of Obama's county victories. The MSM has nothing to do with that. HRC needed to visit these places and connect with people more intimately. She needed to adapt her boring and stiff style to energize the Bernie voters. She failed. Trump did something unorthodox, but that also had to do with less funding than he expected. He went for the low hanging fruit and used Twitter, a much cheaper but effective communication method. So you can debate why someone might have voted for him vs her, but you can't debate they voted for him because they thought he was qualified and would be a good public servant. If anything, the MSM helped him by giving him so much air time. That for sure was a disadvantage for Dems. You need to get over Nov 8 and the MSM conspiracy. He is almost half a year into his term and you refuse to talk about his track record. You are just a braindead minion.
Even better "rambling." Great job avoiding any objective data. Because your opinion on why things occurred is important (ha). Almost sounds like you believe what you wrote too. Well done.
To put your delusion on display- It's less than 4 months into his term, not "almost 6 months." The constant analysis of every word he says/tweets might make it seem like more.
He has accomplished more than I thought he would at this point. And continuously driving you weak-minded, feeling-driven Liberal pu$$ies nuts makes me smile multiple times each day.
exthrower wrote:
independent wrote:I dunno man, you guys have just become so tiring. It's like you honestly believe anything and everything the man does is horrific and horrible. I actually see ppl on these boards saying Trump has done NOTHING which is just ignorant of reality. I feel like Democrats have become so far left, that middle-of-the-roaders have been turned off. You can't keep screaming Russia every minute of every hour of every day, and expect that to work. And then on top of that you cite and quote a media that many in the country either outright reject or question strongly. So many articles ad nauseam have been retracted, amended or proven to be falsehoods. Many are disingenuous. Yet those on the left always call Trump and his administration liars but turn a blind eye to so much on their own side. It's hypocrisy. These double standards are very glaring to the average independent voter, like myself, who has just grown exasperated with the Left. No, I didn't vote for Donald Trump but I sure as hell didn't vote for Hillary Clinton either. Honestly, neither Repubs nor Dems look good at this point, but Dem leaders are bordering on outright hysteria. The Left needs to go back to the drawing board big time, because they don't have the Senate, House or Presidency, and have given the Repubs both chambers in 32 states. OBVIOUSLY their strategy has failed, and they show NO inclination to adjust? What is that about??
Most rational person on this thread.....I had almost given up on Humankind...
Agreed.
You see what the Left does though- they just continuously keep talking/posting until it's just themselves echoing each other's comments. That's the echo chamber effect. They convince themselves that all the gross speculation is reality, and then cry like infants when things aren't what they thought they were. Every day I jump to CNN to see what they're trying to pull. It's very entertaining, at least.
SeeEnEn wrote:
exthrower wrote:Most rational person on this thread.....I had almost given up on Humankind...
Agreed.
You see what the Left does though- they just continuously keep talking/posting until it's just themselves echoing each other's comments. That's the echo chamber effect. They convince themselves that all the gross speculation is reality, and then cry like infants when things aren't what they thought they were. Every day I jump to CNN to see what they're trying to pull. It's very entertaining, at least.
let's remember that trumpers have decided that sexual assault, peeping tomming teenage girls and handing highly classified information over to a hostile nation on a whim is all ok.
But when Dems say 'hey maybe sexual assault, peeping tom and disclosing classified material is bad' it's the Dems in an echo chamber.
insane. It doesn't pass the giggle test, morans.
eric a blair wrote:
SeeEnEn wrote:Agreed.
You see what the Left does though- they just continuously keep talking/posting until it's just themselves echoing each other's comments. That's the echo chamber effect. They convince themselves that all the gross speculation is reality, and then cry like infants when things aren't what they thought they were. Every day I jump to CNN to see what they're trying to pull. It's very entertaining, at least.
let's remember that trumpers have decided that sexual assault, peeping tomming teenage girls and handing highly classified information over to a hostile nation on a whim is all ok.
But when Dems say 'hey maybe sexual assault, peeping tom and disclosing classified material is bad' it's the Dems in an echo chamber.
insane. It doesn't pass the giggle test, morans.
So your response is to list 3 speculative stories? Wow.
Thank you for proving my point, Agip.
eric a blair wrote:
let's remember that trumpers have decided that sexual assault, peeping tomming teenage girls and handing highly classified information over to a hostile nation on a whim is all ok.
But when Dems say 'hey maybe sexual assault, peeping tom and disclosing classified material is bad' it's the Dems in an echo chamber.
insane. It doesn't pass the giggle test, morans.
But see? This is part of the "problem". If you define a "Trumper" as "someone who voted for Trump", then you are making wild generalizations. I can almost guarantee that if you asked 10 HRC and 10 DJT voters why they voted for their candidate, you would be lucky to get a rational, thoughtful reason from one person.
I agree that by voting for a candidate you are implicitly condoning their actions and everything that they represent, but we place so much weight on the decision (vote) that the average person puts so little rational thought into.
SeeEnEn wrote:
eric a blair wrote:let's remember that trumpers have decided that sexual assault, peeping tomming teenage girls and handing highly classified information over to a hostile nation on a whim is all ok.
But when Dems say 'hey maybe sexual assault, peeping tom and disclosing classified material is bad' it's the Dems in an echo chamber.
insane. It doesn't pass the giggle test, morans.
So your response is to list 3 speculative stories? Wow.
Thank you for proving my point, Agip.
oh right, yelling 'fake news' at everything makes it all feel better.
warm cozies, morans.
Count Chocula wrote:
eric a blair wrote:let's remember that trumpers have decided that sexual assault, peeping tomming teenage girls and handing highly classified information over to a hostile nation on a whim is all ok.
But when Dems say 'hey maybe sexual assault, peeping tom and disclosing classified material is bad' it's the Dems in an echo chamber.
insane. It doesn't pass the giggle test, morans.
But see? This is part of the "problem". If you define a "Trumper" as "someone who voted for Trump", then you are making wild generalizations. I can almost guarantee that if you asked 10 HRC and 10 DJT voters why they voted for their candidate, you would be lucky to get a rational, thoughtful reason from one person.
I agree that by voting for a candidate you are implicitly condoning their actions and everything that they represent, but we place so much weight on the decision (vote) that the average person puts so little rational thought into.
The generalization is true IMO, I haven't met one semi-intelligent Trump voter/supporter yet. Btw - no one is crying about anything here. We're finding this all pretty amusing. Your man is going to fully punch out soon, golf rounds will be an almost daily thing once he hits the 1 yr mark and has gotten absolutely nothing done. For everyone who talked $hit about Obama being a community organizer, take a look at Trump in the frying pan getting owned on a daily basis. The POTUS is a marbles player.
TroLLminator wrote:
The generalization is true IMO, I haven't met one semi-intelligent Trump voter/supporter yet.
To be honest, I know a few. But no one will win this battle of anecdotes :)
Btw - no one is crying about anything here. We're finding this all pretty amusing. Your man is going to fully punch out soon, golf rounds will be an almost daily thing once he hits the 1 yr mark and has gotten absolutely nothing done. For everyone who talked $hit about Obama being a community organizer, take a look at Trump in the frying pan getting owned on a daily basis. The POTUS is a marbles player.
I wasn't the person suggesting that anyone here was crying- I actually enjoy the contributions from most of the regulars in this thread. FWIW, POTUS is assuredly not my man, as I did not vote for him and only support maybe 30% of the EOs and policies he has attempted to implement.
TroLLminator wrote:
Count Chocula wrote:But see? This is part of the "problem". If you define a "Trumper" as "someone who voted for Trump", then you are making wild generalizations. I can almost guarantee that if you asked 10 HRC and 10 DJT voters why they voted for their candidate, you would be lucky to get a rational, thoughtful reason from one person.
I agree that by voting for a candidate you are implicitly condoning their actions and everything that they represent, but we place so much weight on the decision (vote) that the average person puts so little rational thought into.
The generalization is true IMO, I haven't met one semi-intelligent Trump voter/supporter yet. Btw - no one is crying about anything here. We're finding this all pretty amusing. Your man is going to fully punch out soon, golf rounds will be an almost daily thing once he hits the 1 yr mark and has gotten absolutely nothing done. For everyone who talked $hit about Obama being a community organizer, take a look at Trump in the frying pan getting owned on a daily basis. The POTUS is a marbles player.
I'm not even thinking about the election. I'm talking NOW.
if you aren't seeing the damage trump is doing, if you aren't pushing back, then you are a trumper and a moran.
forget why you voted. Now is the question.
clearly trumpers are willing to overlook trump's incompetence and attempt to destabilize the entire world.
Now, morans. Now. Not in November 2016. Now.