Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Well, there is always this wrote:
“What kind of an amoral ideologue still supports a politician who has had FIVE campaign officials plead guilty to federal charges?”
Hey, I just posted an article on the Clintons. Not clean either and far from it.
“What kind of an amoral ideologue still supports a politician who has had FIVE campaign officials plead guilty to federal charges?”
Well, there is always this wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Hey, I just posted an article on the Clintons. Not clean either and far from it.
“What kind of an amoral ideologue still supports a politician who has had FIVE campaign officials plead guilty to federal charges?”
Hey, I’ll let you and your buddies cry about Trump day and night. Seems rather pointless since he is President and Hillary is not. Most of you seem pretty obsessed if not delusional.
I am a pro-business Democrat and I think Warren’s platform is very pro-business.
Conservatives think that pro-business means that each individual business should do everything they can to increase profit for the business owners.
Exploiting every loophole to reduce taxes is fine.
I think that if every business paid a fair wage instead of making cuts to keep their bonuses high, then the nationwide customer base would expand and increase business on a macro level.
You would actually have more businesses owners.
The Republican tax cut increased income disparity, reduced the country’s ability to fund services and pointed us to a trillion dollar deficit next year even though we are in a growing economy.
And they call tall themselves fiscal conservatives.
Their tax cuts make big companies bigger and they buy little company with their extra cash. Making fewer business owners.
I like Warren more as an activist than a president.
I’m way left, but prefer a moderate left President that would have a chance at making progress on their agenda.
Askerer of question wrote:
Well, there is always this wrote:
“What kind of an amoral ideologue still supports a politician who has had FIVE campaign officials plead guilty to federal charges?”
To set the record straight, were these five officials charged for crimes which occurred BEFORE Trump became a candidate for President?
sorry, was whitewater during or before the clintons were president?
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/05/politics/clinton-foundation-arkansas-probe/index.html
one source story from 9 months ago.
we'll see what happens.
the accusation is 'access.' that if you gave money to the foundation you could meet with HRC.
seriously. that's it. Maybe policy favors.
the access charge is stupid - every politician in the world sells access for dollars. These dollars were for charity tho. although yeah they were a way around campaign finanice laws I suppose. if it happened.
policy would obvi be more serious.
but jeez - 1 source, 9 months ago, no findings.
whereas we have massive amounts of crimes from the trump circle, including trump himself. he stole from you. you don't care for some reason, but he stole from you by committing tax fraud.
as did kushner.
agip wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/05/politics/clinton-foundation-arkansas-probe/index.htmlone source story from 9 months ago.
we'll see what happens.
the accusation is 'access.' that if you gave money to the foundation you could meet with HRC.
seriously. that's it. Maybe policy favors.
the access charge is stupid - every politician in the world sells access for dollars. These dollars were for charity tho. although yeah they were a way around campaign finanice laws I suppose. if it happened.
policy would obvi be more serious.
but jeez - 1 source, 9 months ago, no findings.
whereas we have massive amounts of crimes from the trump circle, including trump himself. he stole from you. you don't care for some reason, but he stole from you by committing tax fraud.
as did kushner.
Indeed! It seems appropriate to ask:
“What kind of an amoral ideologue still supports a politician who has had FIVE campaign officials plead guilty to federal charges?”
L L wrote:
I am a pro-business Democrat and I think Warren’s platform is very pro-business.
Conservatives think that pro-business means that each individual business should do everything they can to increase profit for the business owners.
Exploiting every loophole to reduce taxes is fine.
I think that if every business paid a fair wage instead of making cuts to keep their bonuses high, then the nationwide customer base would expand and increase business on a macro level.
You would actually have more businesses owners.
The Republican tax cut increased income disparity, reduced the country’s ability to fund services and pointed us to a trillion dollar deficit next year even though we are in a growing economy.
And they call tall themselves fiscal conservatives.
Their tax cuts make big companies bigger and they buy little company with their extra cash. Making fewer business owners.
I like Warren more as an activist than a president.
I’m way left, but prefer a moderate left President that would have a chance at making progress on their agenda.
Are you an idiot?
1) "Conservatives think that pro-business means that each individual business should do everything they can to increase profit for the business owners.
Exploiting every loophole to reduce taxes is fine. "
Yes. Both smart conservative and liberal companies do this. It's called good business. Businesses are in business to make profits. At least the good ones are. If companies don't make profits, they can't grow and succeed. I didn't think there were such dumb people in the world.
2) "Their tax cuts make big companies bigger and they buy little company with their extra cash. Making fewer business owners. "
Geez. are you dumb. This is the goal of small businesses. I've founded three companies. You know what my goal was? To eventually be acquired. When we were both times, it made a lot of money for a lot people in my companies. Each time I was acquired I founded a company that employed more people and was more profitable.
agip wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/05/politics/clinton-foundation-arkansas-probe/index.htmlone source story from 9 months ago.
we'll see what happens.
the accusation is 'access.' that if you gave money to the foundation you could meet with HRC.
seriously. that's it. Maybe policy favors.
the access charge is stupid - every politician in the world sells access for dollars. These dollars were for charity tho. although yeah they were a way around campaign finanice laws I suppose. if it happened.
policy would obvi be more serious.
but jeez - 1 source, 9 months ago, no findings.
whereas we have massive amounts of crimes from the trump circle, including trump himself. he stole from you. you don't care for some reason, but he stole from you by committing tax fraud.
as did kushner.
I never said I didn’t care, I actually do. I think the Clintons and most of our politicians have not served us well.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
agip wrote:
one source story from 9 months ago.
we'll see what happens.
the accusation is 'access.' that if you gave money to the foundation you could meet with HRC.
seriously. that's it. Maybe policy favors.
the access charge is stupid - every politician in the world sells access for dollars. These dollars were for charity tho. although yeah they were a way around campaign finanice laws I suppose. if it happened.
policy would obvi be more serious.
but jeez - 1 source, 9 months ago, no findings.
whereas we have massive amounts of crimes from the trump circle, including trump himself. he stole from you. you don't care for some reason, but he stole from you by committing tax fraud.
as did kushner.
I never said I didn’t care, I actually do. I think the Clintons and most of our politicians have not served us well.
do you regret your vote for trump?
I see you skipped over my point that focusing on few businesses doing very doesn’t help most people.
A politician’s job is to help most people.
Pro business is more businesses doing well and more workers doing well.
The conservative version helps fewer people.
agip wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
I never said I didn’t care, I actually do. I think the Clintons and most of our politicians have not served us well.
do you regret your vote for trump?
agip,
No, I don’t regret any decision I have ever made right or wrong.
Does that make me a bad person in your world?
Igy
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
agip wrote:
do you regret your vote for trump?
agip,
No, I don’t regret any decision I have ever made right or wrong.
Does that make me a bad person in your world?
Igy
well if you don't look back at your decisions and evaluate them as being good and bad...yeah I suppose I do look down on that.
Innocent until wrote:
Nonsense. The Clintons were libeled by decades of lies in the press. They are quite honest, actually, especially compared to the GOP. Bill is a skeezer, but that's between him and Hillary.
No, they aren't quite honest. Stupid! Try listening to something other than CNN.
Flagpole wrote:
Apparently Manafort has spent over 50 hours with Mueller over the last 4 weeks.
What ever do you suppose they are talking about? I say they are comparing recipes.
Key work, "Apparently". Laughable flagpole still looking for support with his outlandish predictions.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
agip wrote:
do you regret your vote for trump?
agip,
No, I don’t regret any decision I have ever made right or wrong.
Does that make me a bad person in your world?
Igy
No it just makes you a thoughtless knucklehead
Easy answer wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
agip,
No, I don’t regret any decision I have ever made right or wrong.
Does that make me a bad person in your world?
Igy
No it just makes you a thoughtless knucklehead
Well what else can you expect from someone who claims to have fought for women’s rights and then votes for grab ‘em by the pu$$y, porn star loving, multiple spouse cheating Trump?
agip wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
agip,
No, I don’t regret any decision I have ever made right or wrong.
Does that make me a bad person in your world?
Igy
well if you don't look back at your decisions and evaluate them as being good and bad...yeah I suppose I do look down on that.
agip,
I figured as much, because in your world you think your vote is smarter and more virtuous then someone else.
Fortunately a democracy shouldn’t work that way.
Good night.
Igy
L L wrote:
I see you skipped over my point that focusing on few businesses doing very doesn’t help most people.
A politician’s job is to help most people.
Pro business is more businesses doing well and more workers doing well.
The conservative version helps fewer people.
I can't respond to ALL idiocy. I can only take so much.
Fake activist wrote:
Easy answer wrote:
No it just makes you a thoughtless knucklehead
Well what else can you expect from someone who claims to have fought for women’s rights and then votes for grab ‘em by the pu$$y, porn star loving, multiple spouse cheating Trump?
And your vote went for the wife that was “just standing by her” man Bill when he actually is proven to have done the same. Of course you will continue your great work for the benefit of promoting women’s rights by your hours posting on LRC.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Fake activist wrote:
Well what else can you expect from someone who claims to have fought for women’s rights and then votes for grab ‘em by the pu$$y, porn star loving, multiple spouse cheating Trump?
And your vote went for the wife that was “just standing by her” man Bill when he actually is proven to have done the same. Of course you will continue your great work for the benefit of promoting women’s rights by your hours posting on LRC.
And your heroette, Melania, said that Trump's extramarital affairs are no concern of hers. But, CONservatives were outraged about sexual affiars--the party of "family values"; LOL--and decided to impeach Bill Clinton.