Ladies and gentlemen, here is your Violent Democrat party in action. Watch as a Portland, Oregon Democrat viciously harasses the widow of a fallen NYPD officer. That officer died on 9-11-2001.
Then watch at 1:30 when the Democrat literally run away when confronted by the woman's son and other American Patriots. It's a thing of beauty.
The Democrat party is cancer.
TTH wrote:
As much as I wish Trump the worst of times, Elizabeth Warren is a complete moron for running through this exercise. Trump referring to her as Pocahantas may be one of the few funny jibes he's come up with during his campaign and early Presidency. She deserves it.
Ha yes shes a moran in general. Not quite sure how she gets elected..............but hey its MA. The birthplace of the American Revolution and one of the most highly regulated, taxed and corrupt states in the USA. Except for perhaps, my little state just to the South. Go figure.
Bone Saw wrote:
Trump's Sons wrote:
If we can take anyone's word at face value, it's the word of a repressive Saudi tyrant, right Republicans!?
Believe Arab Terrorist Regimes! Believe Arab Terrorist Regimes! They are our friends! I won't believe they did anything bad until I see an hd video of them cutting the journalist to pieces! And even then, who cares about fake news?? MAGGA!!
The Saudi interrogation featured 7-minutes with a bone saw. And still, Trump and Mr. Ivanka loves the $$$audis.
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/exclusive-khashoggi-829291552
Whomever was responsible, both in the planning and execution, should be shipped off to North Korea so little rocket man can blow them up with a well placed, below the belt artillery shell.
Anyone over the age of 20 should realize why Gallup is used when comparing polls today vs 20, 30, 40 years ago. It was the only one in the game for generations. It is what it is. I just provide the numbers. Y’all can interpret it misinterpret at your leisure.
There’s also a vast difference between popularity, electability, and the results on Election Day. Hence popular presidents losing or unpopular presidents winning. Happens all the time.
Bush Sr was likely the most qualified President we ever had and Clinton was a long shot just to win the Democratic nomination and had a number of sexual assault or sexual misconduct accusers....sound familiar?
Bush Sr was supposed to be a shoe-in....but the economy tanked and he never fully recovered even though his popularity was I think around 50+ % come Election Day. You can thank Ross Perot.
Alan
Black Rifles Matter wrote:
Ladies and gentlemen, here is your Violent Democrat party in action. Watch as a Portland, Oregon Democrat viciously harasses the widow of a fallen NYPD officer. That officer died on 9-11-2001.
Then watch at 1:30 when the Democrat literally run away when confronted by the woman's son and other American Patriots. It's a thing of beauty.
https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/9oxctf/portland_soyboy_harasses_woman_runs_away_like_the/The Democrat party is cancer.
That douche should be shipped off to North Korea also.
Reality..... wrote:
Actually..... wrote:
(Oh my god, what a moran...)
Yes, you are a moran. Using RCP as your "honest" polling source proves as much.
Nice try. Keep digging yourself deeper, moranski.
Here's why Gallup GAVE UP in 2016 after several terrible accuracy years:
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/gallup-gave-up-heres-why-that-sucks/But yet you believe that using Gallup as the bible for polling is better than looking across all polling sources. Wow.
Bone Saw wrote:
The Saudi interrogation featured 7-minutes with a bone saw. And still, Trump and Mr. Ivanka loves the $$$audis.
No, no, no. Trump doesn't have any financial connections to Saudi Arabia. We know this is true because, like the Saudis, he said so. The fact that he has said the complete opposite in the past and has gone to great lengths to conceal information on his personal and business finances is completely irrelevant. We just have to trust that Donald Trump is always telling the truth and that everyone he vouches for is, too. Questioning our president and investigating heinous violations of international law is uncivil and bad for our country.
Trump and his money "pouring in" from Russia.
In between the sale of the bonds in 2007 and 2013, the year the [Panama] building went bankrupt, buyers of 458 units in the 1,000-unit building abandoned their purchase contracts. Those buyers forfeited more than $50 million in deposits, and they never took possession of finished units. Given that the “buyers” were often shadowy shell companies or other paper entities, it was nearly impossible to discern who the actual purchasers were, let alone why they backed out.
Money was "given" to Trump before units were built. Then the project went bankrupt before units were occupied. Trump kept all of the "investor's" money.
https://features.propublica.org/trump-inc-podcast/trump-family-business-panama-city-khafif/
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
Whomever was responsible, both in the planning and execution, should be shipped off to North Korea so little rocket man can blow them up with a well placed, below the belt artillery shell.
We know who is responsible. Everyone freaking knows who is responsible. So why are you not mad that Trump is protecting them?
TTH wrote:
As much as I wish Trump the worst of times, Elizabeth Warren is a complete moron for running through this exercise. Trump referring to her as Pocahantas may be one of the few funny jibes he's come up with during his campaign and early Presidency. She deserves it.
Nah. Better to get this all out there super-early than to deal with it during the presidential campaign.
Elizabeth Warren can do the dozens like you wouldn't believe. And as nicknames go, "Tiny" beats "Pocahontas" every time.
You are all arguing politics on a running website
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
Bone Saw wrote:
The Saudi interrogation featured 7-minutes with a bone saw. And still, Trump and Mr. Ivanka loves the $$$audis.
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/exclusive-khashoggi-829291552Whomever was responsible, both in the planning and execution, should be shipped off to North Korea so little rocket man can blow them up with a well placed, below the belt artillery shell.
A Saudi diplomat was the bait. Whomever was caught on audio tape. Saudis, not Trump's claim of whomever.
Righty Lefty wrote:
You are all arguing politics on a running website
You prefer:
Today I went for an easy 5 miler.
My 1st mile was 6:25.
My 2nd mile was 6:21.
My 3rd mile was 6:30.
My 4th mile was 6:24.
My 5th mile was 6:12.
Pretty good easy day.
— Signed a Real Runner.
Runningart2004 wrote:
Anyone over the age of 20 should realize why Gallup is used when comparing polls today vs 20, 30, 40 years ago. It was the only one in the game for generations. It is what it is. I just provide the numbers. Y’all can interpret it misinterpret at your leisure.
There’s also a vast difference between popularity, electability, and the results on Election Day. Hence popular presidents losing or unpopular presidents winning. Happens all the time.
Bush Sr was likely the most qualified President we ever had and Clinton was a long shot just to win the Democratic nomination and had a number of sexual assault or sexual misconduct accusers....sound familiar?
Bush Sr was supposed to be a shoe-in....but the economy tanked and he never fully recovered even though his popularity was I think around 50+ % come Election Day. You can thank Ross Perot.
Alan
Studies I've seen say that Perot took away Republican and Democratic votes in roughly equal numbers. Bush lost to Clinton on his own.
I agree that Bush Sr. was quite possibly the best-qualified candidate we've ever had. But, he just wasn't too good at the "vision thing".
The Gallant Pig Man wrote:
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
Whomever was responsible, both in the planning and execution, should be shipped off to North Korea so little rocket man can blow them up with a well placed, below the belt artillery shell.
We know who is responsible. Everyone freaking knows who is responsible. So why are you not mad that Trump is protecting them?
He's a Trumpette.
Next question.
Righty Lefty wrote:
You are all arguing politics on a running website
And you are observing people arguing politics on a running website.
Silliest of Willies wrote:
Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mueller-ready-to-deliver-core-findings-on-trump-probe-after-midterms-reportUh oh, Flagpole getting very excited. He will start to lose sleep.
You notice how CNN and MSNBC aren't even covering this at the moment? Why do you suppose that is? If they had any hint that it would be damning, you know it'd be all over the front page.
They have nothing that we don't already know. Clear as day what happened: Trump told Rosenstein that if he doesn't end this BS charade, he's making everything public and unredacting it all. Rosenstein told Mueller to wrap it up.
No collusion.
No obstruction.
This is going to be DEVASTATING to Clownpole, Eric Blair (agip), Troll, LL, etc here.
Mueller NOPE.
Clownpole DOPE.
You are wrong.
The investigation is a giant success already, no matter what it finds about spanky and kushner. it has made dozens of indictments and guilty pleas. Many of the people closest to trump have been found guilty or plead guilty. Trump has been found to have surrounded himself with criminals - you should stop voting for someone like that. Esp when combined with the revelations about Trujmp's giant tax frauds over the years.
Trump is destroyed - mueller got the dirt. it's done.
this murder thing in turkey is classic trump.
his is covering up a murder...to save his businesses. He sells a carpload of condos and properties to Saudis - that's all he wants. he doesn't care about America.
He's covering up a murder so he can make more money. It's obscene and disgusting.
STSBO wrote:
The Gallant Pig Man wrote:
We know who is responsible. Everyone freaking knows who is responsible. So why are you not mad that Trump is protecting them?
He's a Trumpette.
Next question.
Who said I wasn't you effing idiot?
Actually..... wrote:
(Oh my god, what a moran...)
Oh I'm sorry, were YOU unable to infer that we aren't just using one polling source (Wikipedia only uses Gallup), as that would be quite dumb when it has been proven that a poll of polls is much more accurate? Hey, why not use the Rasmussen poll for the Wikipedia page?
Yeah, but you know, lack of applying basic logic to figure things out is pretty common with you guys.
Is this... supposed to be a coherent argument? Kinda looks like something Trump would say. Also ignores the fact there are indeed polls that have him under 40%.