https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mueller-ready-to-deliver-core-findings-on-trump-probe-after-midterms-report
Uh oh, Flagpole getting very excited. He will start to lose sleep.
Uh oh, Flagpole getting very excited. He will start to lose sleep.
Flagpole wrote:
Racket wrote:
Nope! Not insane! Only care about repealing Roe v Wade? Congrats, you're one step closer! Only care about getting richer and growing your business unabated? Congrats, you're many steps ahead because of Trump.
Also lol @ most sinful man to be our president (as if you could even quantify that). Plenty of presidents had a less than stellar past that included fraud, deceit, infidelity, and even slave owning!
Don't be so hyperbolic. At the end of the day, Trump represents the R agenda. People support him and will continue to do so for the greater good of the GOP regardless of his dipsh!ttery.
1) I didn't say they wouldn't continue to support him. I said it is INSANE to do so...because it is. If you ONLY care about Roe v Wade or getting richer to the exclusion of all other things, then that is insane.
2) Slavery is of course a different issue...different time, different laws, etc. Start with the fact that LYING is a sin...based on sheer numbers, he has the sinful championship locked up. When you add in his infidelities, his disrespect of his father (when there isn't any evidence that he SHOULD disrespect his father who gave him everything), and his epic and deep criminal behavior (that will be proven), there is no doubt he is the most sinful ever. I look at the Ten Commandments, and the only one I don't believe he for sure hasn't committed is murder...and since he's amoral, just give that some time.
INSANE to support Trump at this point...how do you support a criminal who lies to your face constantly? Insanity is the reason.
nah, not insane. if you live a typical trumpist town, with meth addicts and a closed factory, with a bunch of old, poor, scared white people who are terrified of black people and Hispanics and would rather sit back and get SS and welfare than move, or compete with immigrants...then you are right to support the white nationalist party, esp trump. Not insane.
agip wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
1) I didn't say they wouldn't continue to support him. I said it is INSANE to do so...because it is. If you ONLY care about Roe v Wade or getting richer to the exclusion of all other things, then that is insane.
2) Slavery is of course a different issue...different time, different laws, etc. Start with the fact that LYING is a sin...based on sheer numbers, he has the sinful championship locked up. When you add in his infidelities, his disrespect of his father (when there isn't any evidence that he SHOULD disrespect his father who gave him everything), and his epic and deep criminal behavior (that will be proven), there is no doubt he is the most sinful ever. I look at the Ten Commandments, and the only one I don't believe he for sure hasn't committed is murder...and since he's amoral, just give that some time.
INSANE to support Trump at this point...how do you support a criminal who lies to your face constantly? Insanity is the reason.
nah, not insane. if you live a typical trumpist town, with meth addicts and a closed factory, with a bunch of old, poor, scared white people who are terrified of black people and Hispanics and would rather sit back and get SS and welfare than move, or compete with immigrants...then you are right to support the white nationalist party, esp trump. Not insane.
It may be unethical or lazy to support Trump, but I definitely wouldn't say insane.
how do you support a criminal who lies to your face constantly
Depends on how rich he'll make me.
Fat hurts wrote:
Boys on the Track wrote:
And calling him Tiny makes you feel like a big boy?
I think calling him "Tiny" is an outstanding political strategy. Everyone on the left should start calling him "Tiny".
In a single word you bring to mind his infidelity and his general smallness. It's branding at its best.
"Tiny" will drive Trump more insane than he already is. "Teeny Weeny" would drop him over the edge of the abyss to heII.
Boys on the Track wrote:
Funny thing, when a lady named Mary Mahoney tried to complain about Hillary and what she was doing with interns, female interns, she somehow ended up dead after being shot 5 times? Now of course that just a conspiracy theory and a pure coincidence, right?
I've never voted Democrat, but I do wish you guys would stop with the crazy shit. You're not helping.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/local/daily/march99/cooper18.htm.
.
.
.
Also, when was Hillary Clinton ever President? This thread is about Donald Trump. Please stay on topic, and stop trying to deflect.
Racket wrote:
agip wrote:
nah, not insane. if you live a typical trumpist town, with meth addicts and a closed factory, with a bunch of old, poor, scared white people who are terrified of black people and Hispanics and would rather sit back and get SS and welfare than move, or compete with immigrants...then you are right to support the white nationalist party, esp trump. Not insane.
It may be unethical or lazy to support Trump, but I definitely wouldn't say insane.
how do you support a criminal who lies to your face constantly
Depends on how rich he'll make me.
yeah, that's a good point. The corporate and billionaire donors that keep the GOP alive are raking in the cash from the tax cuts - just massive billions. And it's clear that the GOP will never tax real estate developers, so they are donating too. So yeah - rich people - not insane to support trump. They get a big tax cut. They get waht they bought.
The middle class trump people are voting on racial animus and culture wars.
neither insane.
terrible for america, but not insane.
Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mueller-ready-to-deliver-core-findings-on-trump-probe-after-midterms-reportUh oh, Flagpole getting very excited. He will start to lose sleep.
You notice how CNN and MSNBC aren't even covering this at the moment? Why do you suppose that is? If they had any hint that it would be damning, you know it'd be all over the front page.
They have nothing that we don't already know. Clear as day what happened: Trump told Rosenstein that if he doesn't end this BS charade, he's making everything public and unredacting it all. Rosenstein told Mueller to wrap it up.
No collusion.
No obstruction.
This is going to be DEVASTATING to Clownpole, Eric Blair (agip), Troll, LL, etc here.
Mueller NOPE.
Clownpole DOPE.
Racket wrote:
Dark society wrote:
Obama's average approval rating from his 8 year tenure was 47%. Stop trying to insinuate otherwise. 47%. That blows, especially considering the MSM was fawning over him the entire time.
Hmmm well Trump's 39% right now so if 47% is bad then yikes
43.3% at the moment.
https://realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.htmlActually..... wrote:
Racket wrote:
Hmmm well Trump's 39% right now so if 47% is bad then yikes
43.3% at the moment.
https://realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.html
Not a single poll has him under 40%, yet Racket says it's at "39% right now". Typical.
RCP Average 9/27 - 10/16 -- 43.3
Economist/YouGov 10/14 - 10/16 1273 RV 45
Rasmussen Reports 10/14 - 10/16 1500 LV 49
Gallup 10/8 - 10/14 1500 A 44
ABC News/Wash Post 10/8 - 10/11 991 RV 43
Reuters/Ipsos 10/3 - 10/9 2012 LV 42
CNBC 10/4 - 10/7 800 A 41
CNN 10/4 - 10/7 920 RV 43
Emerson 10/1 - 10/4 1000 RV 43
NPR/PBS/Marist 10/1 - 10/1 996 RV 43
IBD/TIPP 9/27 - 10/3 905 A 40
Harvard-Harris 9/29 - 9/30 1330 RV 45
Quinnipiac 9/27 - 9/30 1111 RV 41
Americans continue to reject democrat sponsored political correctness.
Suck on that, you democrat pieces of trash.
Democrats lose again!!!!!!
Actually..... wrote:
Actually..... wrote:
43.3% at the moment.
https://realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.htmlNot a single poll has him under 40%, yet Racket says it's at "39% right now". Typical.
RCP Average 9/27 - 10/16 -- 43.3
Economist/YouGov 10/14 - 10/16 1273 RV 45
Rasmussen Reports 10/14 - 10/16 1500 LV 49
Gallup 10/8 - 10/14 1500 A 44
ABC News/Wash Post 10/8 - 10/11 991 RV 43
Reuters/Ipsos 10/3 - 10/9 2012 LV 42
CNBC 10/4 - 10/7 800 A 41
CNN 10/4 - 10/7 920 RV 43
Emerson 10/1 - 10/4 1000 RV 43
NPR/PBS/Marist 10/1 - 10/1 996 RV 43
IBD/TIPP 9/27 - 10/3 905 A 40
Harvard-Harris 9/29 - 9/30 1330 RV 45
Quinnipiac 9/27 - 9/30 1111 RV 41
YouGov: 10/13-15 — 39% Approve / 54% Disapprove
https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/d752ts8ndl/tabs_Trump_Tweets_20181013.pdfActually..... wrote:
Actually..... wrote:
43.3% at the moment.
https://realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.htmlNot a single poll has him under 40%, yet Racket says it's at "39% right now". Typical.
RCP Average 9/27 - 10/16 -- 43.3
Economist/YouGov 10/14 - 10/16 1273 RV 45
Rasmussen Reports 10/14 - 10/16 1500 LV 49
Gallup 10/8 - 10/14 1500 A 44
ABC News/Wash Post 10/8 - 10/11 991 RV 43
Reuters/Ipsos 10/3 - 10/9 2012 LV 42
CNBC 10/4 - 10/7 800 A 41
CNN 10/4 - 10/7 920 RV 43
Emerson 10/1 - 10/4 1000 RV 43
NPR/PBS/Marist 10/1 - 10/1 996 RV 43
IBD/TIPP 9/27 - 10/3 905 A 40
Harvard-Harris 9/29 - 9/30 1330 RV 45
Quinnipiac 9/27 - 9/30 1111 RV 41
There's literally a Wikipedia page on it :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_approval_ratingOh were you unable to infer we were talking about average approval ratings and not current ones? Yeah lack of inference and inability to deduce is pretty common with you guys.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/join-my-tribe-elizabeth-warren/2018/10/16/3fb0867e-d181-11e8-b2d2-f397227b43f0_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.6e0f70de62d9Flagpole wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Result for Democrat - you get caught embellishing, you get crucified and probably hit a ceiling
Result for Republican - you lie openly without shame or admittance, you become speaker of the house or President
Those are the standards
Perception is reality with regard to Elizabeth Warren, but a real thinking person would realize that most of us know (especially white people) what our heritage is only because family members told us what it is. In my case for example, I was told from an early age that I was from the Land of Cool. Fortunately a DNA test has confirmed it to be true, so I don't have to wonder.
Reality..... wrote:
[quote]Actually..... wrote:
RCP Average 9/27 - 10/16 -- 43.3
Economist/YouGov 10/14 - 10/16 1273 RV 45
Rasmussen Reports 10/14 - 10/16 1500 LV 49
Gallup 10/8 - 10/14 1500 A 44
ABC News/Wash Post 10/8 - 10/11 991 RV 43
Reuters/Ipsos 10/3 - 10/9 2012 LV 42
CNBC 10/4 - 10/7 800 A 41
CNN 10/4 - 10/7 920 RV 43
Emerson 10/1 - 10/4 1000 RV 43
NPR/PBS/Marist 10/1 - 10/1 996 RV 43
IBD/TIPP 9/27 - 10/3 905 A 40
Harvard-Harris 9/29 - 9/30 1330 RV 45
Quinnipiac 9/27 - 9/30 1111 RV 41
YouGov: 10/13-15 — 39% Approve / 54% Disapprove
ADD
YouGov = B-rated poll
Rasmussen Reports = C-rated poll
RCP is a bogus polling aggregation source. YouGov is bumped up from 39% to 45% for Trump. But Rasmussen is left at 49% without adjustment. It is very obvious the RCP has a hard right-wing bent.
Racket wrote:
Actually..... wrote:
Not a single poll has him under 40%, yet Racket says it's at "39% right now". Typical.
RCP Average 9/27 - 10/16 -- 43.3
Economist/YouGov 10/14 - 10/16 1273 RV 45
Rasmussen Reports 10/14 - 10/16 1500 LV 49
Gallup 10/8 - 10/14 1500 A 44
ABC News/Wash Post 10/8 - 10/11 991 RV 43
Reuters/Ipsos 10/3 - 10/9 2012 LV 42
CNBC 10/4 - 10/7 800 A 41
CNN 10/4 - 10/7 920 RV 43
Emerson 10/1 - 10/4 1000 RV 43
NPR/PBS/Marist 10/1 - 10/1 996 RV 43
IBD/TIPP 9/27 - 10/3 905 A 40
Harvard-Harris 9/29 - 9/30 1330 RV 45
Quinnipiac 9/27 - 9/30 1111 RV 41
There's literally a Wikipedia page on it :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_approval_ratingOh were you unable to infer we were talking about average approval ratings and not current ones? Yeah lack of inference and inability to deduce is pretty common with you guys.
(Oh my god, what a moran...)
Oh I'm sorry, were YOU unable to infer that we aren't just using one polling source (Wikipedia only uses Gallup), as that would be quite dumb when it has been proven that a poll of polls is much more accurate? Hey, why not use the Rasmussen poll for the Wikipedia page?
Yeah, but you know, lack of applying basic logic to figure things out is pretty common with you guys.
Actually..... wrote:
(Oh my god, what a moran...)
Yes, you are a moran. Using RCP as your "honest" polling source proves as much.
If we can take anyone's word at face value, it's the word of a repressive Saudi tyrant, right Republicans!?
Believe Arab Terrorist Regimes! Believe Arab Terrorist Regimes! They are our friends! I won't believe they did anything bad until I see an hd video of them cutting the journalist to pieces! And even then, who cares about fake news?? MAGGA!!
As much as I wish Trump the worst of times, Elizabeth Warren is a complete moron for running through this exercise. Trump referring to her as Pocahantas may be one of the few funny jibes he's come up with during his campaign and early Presidency. She deserves it.
Trump's Sons wrote:
If we can take anyone's word at face value, it's the word of a repressive Saudi tyrant, right Republicans!?
Believe Arab Terrorist Regimes! Believe Arab Terrorist Regimes! They are our friends! I won't believe they did anything bad until I see an hd video of them cutting the journalist to pieces! And even then, who cares about fake news?? MAGGA!!
The Saudi interrogation featured 7-minutes with a bone saw. And still, Trump and Mr. Ivanka loves the $$$audis.
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/exclusive-khashoggi-829291552