And he keeps replying to me. Amazing. Even when I am not talking to him.
You are writing about me. But then you don't write about anything else. You lot are obsessed with attacking me for my views about Ingebrigtsen, which don't match yours. If it didn't matter to you you would let it go and not respond. You can't.
You are writing about me. But then you don't write about anything else. You lot are obsessed with attacking me for my views about Ingebrigtsen, which don't match yours. If it didn't matter to you you would let it go and not respond. You can't.
Yes, he's superior in both the 5000 and 10000. He's not superior in the 5000 when he's run a total of 3 global finals since 2015, won one and finished 9th and 8th in the other two.
12:35 as against 12:48 says he's ahead. By the length of the straight.
A few days ago you said you were not coming back to this thread. And yet here you are, having your ignorance exposed again and again.
We own you.
No, you don’t own him -most of you are having so weak arguments that you have to go after the man and not the ball. And therefore again and again repeat this childish “dumb” thing, and also try to be mean. But the worse you are the better Arms comes out of it -I’m laughing my arse off..!
You can't taken seriously.
Weak arguments? He doesn't even accept pure facts like times, number of wins and so on.
Continue with your lengthy explanations - and ignore all of Arms terrible behaviour.
So they haven't raced in nearly 3 years. That obviously decides it. However in the same 3 years Ingebrigtsen remains 13 seconds slower than Cheptegei over 5k. That too could decide it. On Ingebrigtsen's record he won't make 12:35 any time soon. Maybe he needs another 3 years?
No, you don’t own him -most of you are having so weak arguments that you have to go after the man and not the ball. And therefore again and again repeat this childish “dumb” thing, and also try to be mean. But the worse you are the better Arms comes out of it -I’m laughing my arse off..!
You can't taken seriously.
Weak arguments? He doesn't even accept pure facts like times, number of wins and so on.
Continue with your lengthy explanations - and ignore all of Arms terrible behaviour.
There aren't any "pure" facts; only biased and self-serving arguments.
So they haven't raced in nearly 3 years. That obviously decides it. However in the same 3 years Ingebrigtsen remains 13 seconds slower than Cheptegei over 5k. That too could decide it. On Ingebrigtsen's record he won't make 12:35 any time soon. Maybe he needs another 3 years?
Cheptegei finished 6th and 9th in races won by Ingebrigtsen. It seems obvious that Cheptegei's dnc in both 2023 and 2024 has to do with Ingebrigtsen.
12:35? We can't know. In 3 years? Maybe. Maybe in the indoor season - we will see.
So they haven't raced in nearly 3 years. That obviously decides it. However in the same 3 years Ingebrigtsen remains 13 seconds slower than Cheptegei over 5k. That too could decide it. On Ingebrigtsen's record he won't make 12:35 any time soon. Maybe he needs another 3 years?
There's 24 people ahead of Farah who set their PB before 2012, more than the number of people separating Jakob from first, and increase that to 2016 when super shoes got introduced and the gap gets even larger. Your arguments don't even hold up even after you try to lie, move the goal posts and apply different sets of criteria to different runners.
And where on Earth did you get Farah running 12:50 from? His PB is 12:53, and no, there's more than 2 seconds separating 12:48 and 12:53. You should really seek professional help when you're struggling with dyscalculia this badly.
A couple of seconds - so f****** what. But the difference you never address and never can is the Farah has championship attainments that put him at the very top of the sport and Ingebrigtsen can never match. You're a baby.
I've acknowledged plenty of times that I don't think Jakob is better than Farah in long distance because I think championships are more important than fast times, but that I think he will be at the end of his career because Jakob has won 3 global golds at age 23 when Farah won his first at age 28.
You not only struggle with numbers but you also struggle with the fact that other people are actually consistent in the criteria they judge runners by and don't just cherry pick. You're getting angry when the criteria you yourself use to judge runners gets applied to others.
Yes, he's superior in both the 5000 and 10000. He's not superior in the 5000 when he's run a total of 3 global finals since 2015, won one and finished 9th and 8th in the other two.
12:35 as against 12:48 says he's ahead. By the length of the straight.
Why did he finish 9th when Jakob won in the last global final they both were in if Cheptegei is so much faster?
So they haven't raced in nearly 3 years. That obviously decides it. However in the same 3 years Ingebrigtsen remains 13 seconds slower than Cheptegei over 5k. That too could decide it. On Ingebrigtsen's record he won't make 12:35 any time soon. Maybe he needs another 3 years?
Thanks, I'll use this logic in the 1500. Sweet!
In Armys special little world it's a worse performance to finish fourth and second in the 1500 when you're not the world record holder compared to finishing 9th and 8th in the 5000 when you are the world record holder. He's not very good with numbers, you see.
A couple of seconds - so f****** what. But the difference you never address and never can is the Farah has championship attainments that put him at the very top of the sport and Ingebrigtsen can never match. You're a baby.
I've acknowledged plenty of times that I don't think Jakob is better than Farah in long distance because I think championships are more important than fast times, but that I think he will be at the end of his career because Jakob has won 3 global golds at age 23 when Farah won his first at age 28.
You not only struggle with numbers but you also struggle with the fact that other people are actually consistent in the criteria they judge runners by and don't just cherry pick. You're getting angry when the criteria you yourself use to judge runners gets applied to others.
What dipsticks like you don't get is that threads like this, about how good a runner is or who is better, is mostly just a matter of opinion. But you take yourselves so seriously and can't cope with views that aren't yours. The thread began with Kerr throwing shade at Ingebrigtsen. It sure has got you fans all hot and bothered. It certainly is entertaining to see you all get so worked up.
I've acknowledged plenty of times that I don't think Jakob is better than Farah in long distance because I think championships are more important than fast times, but that I think he will be at the end of his career because Jakob has won 3 global golds at age 23 when Farah won his first at age 28.
You not only struggle with numbers but you also struggle with the fact that other people are actually consistent in the criteria they judge runners by and don't just cherry pick. You're getting angry when the criteria you yourself use to judge runners gets applied to others.
What dipsticks like you don't get is that threads like this, about how good a runner is or who is better, is mostly just a matter of opinion. But you take yourselves so seriously and can't cope with views that aren't yours. The thread began with Kerr throwing shade at Ingebrigtsen. It sure has got you fans all hot and bothered. It certainly is entertaining to see you all get so worked up.
You can't even get basic facts right about runners, like what their personal bests are, which means your opinions on who the best is holds little to no weight whatsoever.