ttc wrote:
Roland Barthes wrote:better..chance of winning by going with the pack and hoping that somebody gets boxed, somebody else goes too soon, etc.
I don't know about that. I'd rather Webb do what he did while believing in himself as the strongest competitor. For him to just wait on others to make a mistake or get into difficulty is pretty lax.
He went for it but didn't get it. I don't think the solution is to not go for it. Instead it's to get better like he's intending to do, and to use the experience.
BTW, if Prefontaine was present day and did the exact same thing, it'd add to his legend.
What my post tried to say is that the notion of "going for it" is not the way I saw his race. I think he had zero, nada, zip, chance of running away from the field, so I don't think it was "going for it" to make that move. I think it was merely foolish. His strategy was to take the field by the neck and throttle them into submission. Nothing in his background suggests he is ready to do this. And he wasn't.
And, yes, I agree, because Webb is not the best runner in the field, he almost certainly would have also "failed" to win by waiting for others to move first. Maybe you see that as "lax." But I see a patient strategy as "going for it" more than I do making the big doomed move. A more patient strategy wouldn't have necessarily been conceding defeat. I think he would have had a better chance of finding a finishing gear he didn't know was there than he wuold have had running away from everyone that far out.
Prefontaine in 72 was able to drop everybody but one, and two more came back on him. Webb dropped nobody. Big difference.