2:59:05, troll. Metro-Dade, 1994. Wrong again; you...don’t...know... what...you’re...talking...about...
2:59:05, troll. Metro-Dade, 1994. Wrong again; you...don’t...know... what...you’re...talking...about...
not past his prime- he's 33 wrote:
jesseriley wrote:
You don’t know what you’re talking about
He's right Jesse, you live on here. Obviously, this IS your life. Sad.
Hahaha! Spot on!
jesseriley wrote:
2:59:05, troll. Metro-Dade, 1994. Wrong again; you...don’t...know... what...you’re...talking...about...
He's right again J.R. This is your life and this site and the other posters own you.
I’m honored to be grouped with Sage.
jesseriley wrote:
2:59:05, troll. Metro-Dade, 1994. Wrong again; you...don’t...know... what...you’re...talking...about...
No, those results don't come up. try again Jesse the troll under the bridge.
I agree with the others, you live on here more than any other poster.
If your research is a little short, don’t blame me, babe.
jesseriley wrote:
If your research is a little short, don’t blame me, babe.
Triggered the little princess, eh?
There are no results, you lie.
3:45 at best, that's you.
Speaking of people getting paid to run, you may want to check the French Open, while you’re babbling...
Didn’t know “snowflake” had 3 F’s. Or maybe that’s your latest junior-high report card.
jesseriley wrote:
Didn’t know “snowflake” had 3 F’s. Or maybe that’s your latest junior-high report card.
Wow, you really told him princess Riley! LOL at your lame comeback. You're a tool with a sub 4 hour pr, if that. Go back and cuddle with your boyfriend princess.
26 minutes for that?
jesseriley wrote:
26 minutes for that?
36 minutes for that?
jesseriley wrote:
26 minutes for that?
I posted on the first page. Stopped while you're behind Jess as you're looking more and more like a fool. They are correct, this is your life, embrace what you are.
From reading his Strava post he had bad cramps from miles 37-39 and his splits slowed after that so definitely could’ve gone sub 6, which was his goal going in. Did good!
Less meat is better. wrote:
Top 10 while Camilla Herron won't make it.
You were right but she was defending champ from last up run. Why did you think she would drop?
Weak race from a weak man.
Pretty shocking that a man who purposefully avoids essential nutrients has never performed at the top level!
laurentm wrote:
Less meat is better. wrote:
Top 10 while Camilla Herron won't make it.
You were right but she was defending champ from last up run. Why did you think she would drop?
I follow her races and there is no rhyme or reason why she is racing the races she is racing. She want to do everything at the same time. From 50 mile trail races to 100 milers over 24 hours on track to Comrades. She does not have a proper build up and races too many races.
This was the second DNF for the year.
Next is Western States 100, Leadville 100 and the 24 hour World Championships. Chances are high that she won't finish any of those. (Everything under 130 miles is a DNF in my book at the 24 hour WC)
Recently I heard that Camille is the laughing stock at 100 mile campfires around the country. And it looks like this won't change anytime soon.
Sage goes from 15th in 2015 to 21st in 2019. Also can't break 2:20 anymore, getting injured ad sick all the time. But at least he "feels great" on a "near-vegan" diet!
Vegan Deterioration wrote:
Sage goes from 15th in 2015 to 21st in 2019. Also can't break 2:20 anymore, getting injured ad sick all the time. But at least he "feels great" on a "near-vegan" diet!
Almost none of this is true. His performance this year was on par with his previous performance. He rarely gets injured except when he falls in a trail race. The constant trolling on his diet is sad. I highly doubt he would be any better if he ate red meat.
Another mediocre race by Sage - he folded like a bad hand in the critical stretch of the race