The Brit wrote:
Of course its racist. It impacts on the events in which Kenya and Ethiopia are dominant. The 5000m and 10000m are classic track events with lengthy histories and lessening their importance is crazy. Unless you want less African dominance. No, Kenya hasn't been banned like Russia, but then its not dominant across all events and has clearly been dealt with in another way.
What has the 10000m got to do with it? That hasn't been part of the Diamond League or its precursor for many years. In what way is Coe/IAAF responsible for the decline of this distance?
The IAAF Committee, not Coe alone, has removed the 5000m from the Diamond League set up, with the caveat that there can and probably will be just as many 5000m races at the DL meets, they just won't be part of the DL televised concept. Perhaps if any of the Kenyans or Ethiopians ran in more than 2 of these DL 5000m races last year, then it wouldn't have been dropped!? The IAAF made it clear that most of the 5000m competitors would be more likely to run in several 3000m races over the course of a DL season than over the 5k. It comes down to supply and demand.
The Brit wrote:
Yes, the World Cross Country Championships became biennial in the time of Diack, but I suspect it had plenty to do with the new guard moving in. Its a ridiculous concept anyway. It should be annual. Its a very specific event.
The Worlds are every 2 years, the World Indoors are every 2 years, the Europeans are every 2 years! Why should X Country be any different?
The Brit wrote:
I also suspect the banning of Russia was racist. Yes, doping there is bad and state sponsored but theres plenty of other countries such as Spain, Greece and Turkey which have had similar regimes or continue to do so without being banned.
No. Spain, Greece and Turkey have never been proven to have a state sponsored regime of covering up doping positives and tampering with nationals' samples at a home Olympics! A very different proposition altogether.
The Brit wrote:
The Semenya case is a completely different issue. That is a man with a hormone disorder, and should not be running in women's events so as to reduce the opportunities of female athletes.
I'll give you that one. Whole-heartedly agree! The problem is that stating such is construed in some quarters as evidence of racism; which of course it is not to anyone who isn't driven by their own specific agenda.