Son of HRE wrote:
HRE wrote:
Yes. Arthur said that "even a fifteen minute run can be very beneficial." Robbins was not a "Lydiard guy." His best years were before anyone knew of Arthur outside of his group in New Zealand. In the mid to late 70s, Runner's World ran an article that referenced a study done on female marathon runners in the UK trying to isolate the variable that was the best predictor of a fast time. It turned out not be mileage, that was predictor #2. The #1 predictor was the total number of runs taken.
This was not the point of the article and there was nothing more about that study. There are loads of questions one could ask about it so take it for what you want. But running doubles was also a big part of the Bowerman System and some of the doubles some, not all, his guys ran were pretty minimal, maybe 2-3 miles. And some of the "supplementary runs" that some of Lydiard's guys did were short. The guy who had our school record in the mile at the college where I ran almost never ran more than 12-15 minutes at a time. But he'd do that 4-5 times a day. Gordon Pirie once coached a guy I knew to his best mile time and had him doing four 20 minute runs a day.
It raises the question of endurance though, right? Can you build endurance for, say, a 5K or 10K by only running multiple 15 minute runs?
I think for 800m-5k runners it would work well. But probably won't develop the same type of muscular strength you get from long runs. That you need for 10k and above.