bazap wrote:
Top Posters by Year
2007
1. Flagpole Willy (2717)
2. txRUNNERgirl (2049)
3. malmo (1927)
4. Runningart2004 (1696)
5. Skuj (1462)
Not surprisingly, this correlates with the year I was running the least due to injury.
bazap wrote:
Top Posters by Year
2007
1. Flagpole Willy (2717)
2. txRUNNERgirl (2049)
3. malmo (1927)
4. Runningart2004 (1696)
5. Skuj (1462)
Not surprisingly, this correlates with the year I was running the least due to injury.
more ideas wrote:
Count of "moran" and "discus" by year
"moran"
2002- 4
2003 - 17
2004 - 23
2005 - 26
2006 - 17
2007 - 36
2008 - 32
2009 - 35
2010 - 25
2011 - 43
2012 - 27
2013 - 175
2014 - 133
2015 - 225
2016 - 699
2017 - 999
2018 - 171
"discus"
2002 - 534
2003 - 1791
2004 - 2349
2005 - 3229
2006 - 3483
2007 - 4099
2008 - 3689
2009 - 3784
2010 - 3484
2011 - 4329
2012 - 4125
2013 - 4466
2014 - 4751
2015 - 5369
2016 - 6690
2017 - 5835
2018 - 1416
Number of threads, and total posts in threads, about Webb, Ritz, and Hall?
In this table:
bazap wrote:"discus"
2002 - 534
2003 - 1791
2004 - 2349
2005 - 3229
2006 - 3483
2007 - 4099
2008 - 3689
2009 - 3784
2010 - 3484
2011 - 4329
2012 - 4125
2013 - 4466
2014 - 4751
2015 - 5369
2016 - 6690
2017 - 5835
2018 - 1416
does your count include incidences of "discus" contained within the proper spelling "discuss"?
Average 5k time of members remains a steady 13:50 and the average income has no doubt risen to over $1m
deer me
Non prolific wrote:
That’s a sad list that I hope I never make.
My sentiments exactly.
If we generated the list by IP Address not poster name what would we see?
wineturtle wrote:
If we generated the list by IP Address not poster name what would we see?
People wonder why productivity is declining .
wineturtle brings up a valid point wrote:
wineturtle wrote:
If we generated the list by IP Address not poster name what would we see?
A lot more posts when Million Dollar Babe was regularly using the same computer.
Good stuff, B. Two requests, one probably a lot easier than the other:
-Can you identify the top 10 most posted images - either per year or ever? I'll guess the Rupp posing/pointing picture is up there. Maybe a Frerichs/Coburn celebration is high up on the list from last year
-Can you index all the posts and create a search engine for the forums that doesn't suck ass?
I thought Mr. Chest would have been up there in the early years, that cat was a hoot
runguru wrote:
I thought Mr. Chest would have been up there in the early years, that cat was a hoot
As was the guy who made the stilted-language posts praising Makhloufi as "The Algerian Lion" or somesuch.
i am not on any top 10 list wrote:
Good stuff, B. Two requests, one probably a lot easier than the other:
-Can you identify the top 10 most posted images - either per year or ever? I'll guess the Rupp posing/pointing picture is up there. Maybe a Frerichs/Coburn celebration is high up on the list from last year
-Can you index all the posts and create a search engine for the forums that doesn't suck ass?
Your first request would be similar to calculating the most commonly used words on this site and its difficult to do. Basically you have to index all of the images that have ever been linked to and then from there check from each post how many times any of those phrases / links / etc appear. I may consider going down this route eventually but its not simple
For indexing posts I couldn't support such a system as that would cost a good bit of money to host something like that and then to have the computational power to support quick searches
Lol...
that is awesome.
Thank you for making my dreams become reality.
hey, yeah? wrote:
In this table:
bazap wrote:"discus"
2002 - 534
2003 - 1791
2004 - 2349
2005 - 3229
2006 - 3483
2007 - 4099
2008 - 3689
2009 - 3784
2010 - 3484
2011 - 4329
2012 - 4125
2013 - 4466
2014 - 4751
2015 - 5369
2016 - 6690
2017 - 5835
2018 - 1416
does your count include incidences of "discus" contained within the proper spelling "discuss"?
Good question. And how many times was discus used because the discus throw was actually being discussed?
bazap wrote:
For indexing posts I couldn't support such a system as that would cost a good bit of money to host something like that and then to have the computational power to support quick searches
I hear there is a new startup called Google that recently created a way to index a web of pages. I think they are calling it a search engine or something like that. Give it a try, it may be the next big thing.
Or you can try Hadoop. The space to store all the text of LRC would be small compared to a single hard drive these days. You should be able to easily process it all. Heck, putting it in any traditional sql server should let you do the same thing.
What about deleted threads and posts? There have been a lot of deletings going on this year.
Info wrote:
Good question. And how many times was discus used because the discus throw was actually being discussed?
Don't you mean the dicuss throw?
If there was only a way to measure the comprehension on this site.
