In reality, it has a touch more class than the drivel you trot out on a daily basis under the guise of journalism.
In reality, it has a touch more class than the drivel you trot out on a daily basis under the guise of journalism.
Old Wrestler wrote:
Absolutely made my day. Great post. With all of the crap this board has produced lately, a good laugh is what I have missed. Thanks G-spotter.
G-Spotter wrote:Only if the bag contains a chloroform rag.
POY
fred wrote:
k but wrote:I wouldn't bother, she's a look at me show pony same as Genevieve LaCaze.
Here in Australia we've got thousands that look as good or better than those two, but without the narcissistic ego.
Are they as fast?
She's pretty slow
60m 7.78 0.0 Wollongong (AUS) 16.01.2016
100m 11.75 +1.9 Gold Coast (AUS) 21.06.2015
200m 25.41
Looks like you are a real T&F expert.
She is a hurdler 12.82 PR which is not too bad
You guys have been married too long. She's not that hot.
Yggygguggbubug wrote:
How do you get that?
She was ranked 26th last year. With the 3 per country rule, she's way higher than the 25th seed for Rio.
She would currently be about the 16th fastest American 100HHer in the Rio window if she were American.
Sorting by the 3 per country rule she's currently about the 25th seed for Rio as the second AUS behind Sally Pearson.
Please note the phrase "in the Rio window".
Wait. Does she have a reputation? If yes, sauce or stfu.
apparently you're all to late - big Ian Thorpe is already seeing her and been down under.
Don't waste your time. wrote:
american male age 21 wrote:Anyone on here got the guts to ask her out?
I wouldn't bother, she's a look at me show pony same as Genevieve LaCaze.
Here in Australia we've got thousands that look as good or better than those two, but without the narcissistic ego.
You must be a jogger then. Cos In my memory good looking ranked women of national team standard are hard ot find in any country.
And if you don't have an ego you won't run very fast.
JamesTheAmateur wrote:
Nah. Allison Stokke is my preference
Were you Ginger or mary Anne?
k but wrote:
fred wrote:She's pretty slow
60m 7.78 0.0 Wollongong (AUS) 16.01.2016
100m 11.75 +1.9 Gold Coast (AUS) 21.06.2015
200m 25.41
Keep jiggling
Says more about how shitty Australia is at track than how good looking Jenneke is, really.
She's a hurdler, you idiot. She has a 12.82 best in the 100m hurdles. That time would make it out of the first round at every Olympics in history and even make finals in the occasional slower Olympics.
Also, she is super hot.
Also, she's super conservative, so I wouldn't go near her.
Maybe pretty good for Jamin though. He should drive down next weekend.
Well, I did remove the b, so that's progress. But first of all it is just phonetic spelling of something in an entirely different script, so there is no one correct English spelling, and second the governing association spells it "nunchaku."
The wiki gives multiple English spellings, including the one I used.
you're all too late wrote:
apparently you're all to late - big Ian Thorpe is already seeing her and been down under.
Pretty sure Ian Thorpe is dating her brother.
12.82 indicates that she has relatively minor improvements in hurdling technique holding her back from future medal contention (e.g. within range of 12.5). She may never get there, but she may. Pearson's run sub 12.3, I think.
She is a beautiful women I would ask her out for sure but I won't be in Portland for this though I could it's only like a 4 and half hour drive for me. That warmup dance is sexy if you don't think it is you probably a g@y just saying.
Natural Born Hurdler wrote:
I can't decide which second of that vid I like best: 1:55, 1:56 or 1:57.
Dude, that woman has NO ass to speak of. You need to get out more and see what real women look like.
you're all too late wrote:
apparently you're all to late - big Ian Thorpe is already seeing her and been down under.
I highly doubt that unless Michelle has something special "down under" if you catch my drift
Yeah, I agree, no shortage of big flabby badonkadonk out there, as I'm sure you are into. A little higher and tighter works for the rest of us.
Cis Co wrote:
Natural Born Hurdler wrote:I can't decide which second of that vid I like best: 1:55, 1:56 or 1:57.
Dude, that woman has NO ass to speak of. You need to get out more and see what real women look like.
You can always count on it. Virgins on Letsrun sure are picky.
Yeah flat as a board, huh?https://www.instagram.com/p/_dXblMKuWi/?taken-by=mjenneke93&hl=en
Cis Co wrote:
Natural Born Hurdler wrote:I can't decide which second of that vid I like best: 1:55, 1:56 or 1:57.
Dude, that woman has NO ass to speak of. You need to get out more and see what real women look like.
Don't waste your time. wrote:
american male age 21 wrote:Anyone on here got the guts to ask her out?
I wouldn't bother, she's a look at me show pony same as Genevieve LaCaze.
Here in Australia we've got thousands that look as good or better than those two, but without the narcissistic ego.
Good, so I can ask out Gen?