Ponderosa Pines wrote:
bend it like bedlam wrote:Man, that was a terrible meet. Maybe full results aren't available because everyone involved was ashamed that only 40-50 people entered the senior races. Thank goodness for the military teams to pad the fields.
I don't thin i've heard of more than 4-5 of those top 10 women. And the men's runner-up is a high-29 d2 guy?
0.4/10
Unless you were out there yourself you have no right busting on the athletes that ran in Bend this weekend. They put on a good meet.
Suver and Van Alstine are among the upper tier (31:54 and 15:22 Prs respectively). In the men's race Andy Wacker, XC All American and 2nd in world mtn running championships last summer didn't make the top 5.
The fields weren't as deep because A) there is another big race next week on the west coast (a little place called LA, a qualifier for a little event down in Brazil next summer), and B) no WCs in XC this year.
What is this, your mom's church bake sale? I'm not faulting the folks in Bend who put it on. But as a fan, I think it's embarrassing to all of us who love the sport for our national championship to be so weak. I can understand some of the top guys being absent in a non-World Cross year a week before the Trials. But for the fields to be so small should make us all ask what's wrong with this event (not the Bend version of it per se, but in general).
And why can't I be critical if I wasn't there? I wasn't at the Super Bowl tonight either. Can I not have an opinion on that either?
And while I'm sure Andy Wacker is a fine human being, I don't think you're scoring a lot of points by mentioning a guy who ran 28:52 3 years ago...
Congrats to all those who ran in Bend. But as a cross country fan, the results and turnout don't leave me with a warm fuzzy feeling about the future of the event.