Are you a sub 40 min 10 K runner? Look here then!

Forgot age: 26 years (25 at time of race listed above)

173

70

38:15

36y

40-50km

Maybe I need to clarify once again that it was made on 44 recreational runners, most of them working full time. The times are set on road races (i.e. 10K and not 10 000 m). There are maybe only 3-4 sub elite runners (running low 32 min) in the Swedish material. The runners in the Swedish sample are also pretty old (see me first post).

I'm surprised to see how much people train her (in America?). So if you are a high mileage runner, the estimate might be way off.

27 female

Bmi 18.1

38:26

40 miles per week

If I did the math right your calculator has me at 35:01 (oh I wish!)

@Ehh?

Please enter your height and weight. There will be data missing otherwise. I can compute BMI myself from these values.

Your time is equivalent to approximately 34:26, if you were a guy.

6'0

178lb

70-80km a week

18

34:29

Forgot age, 20 years old.

Height, 6ft 2"

weight 11st 11lb

10K time (in min:sec) 39:43

average weekly volume (at the time you ran 10K sub 40 min): 44 mpw

I'm a 33 year old male

Read more:

http://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=6761787#ixzz3meIjniqt

Height: 6' 2"

Weight: 120 lb

Age: 23

10K Time: 30:19

Ave Weekly Mileage: 110 mpw

Height: 5' 11"

Weight: 210 lb

Age: 27

10K Time: 29:36

Ave Weekly Mileage: 50 mpw

I think this thread was asking about running...not biking times and mileage.

Just get data and fit a curve to it (ie. Fourier series or Taylor series)

I can't work that formula out at all, can someone explain it to me in idiot speak?

Higher BMI = slower

Older age = slower

More miles training = faster

5'11

165 pounds

33:42

Running 60 MPW

6'1

155lb

70 miles

24

31:16

6'1"

181 lbs

39:20

33 years old

~ 30k per week

6ft1

192

10k 37:50

Age 37

80km week

32 years old male

5'11

110 lbs

30:14 5K

50 miles a week