Why are white women good runners and sprinters but white men aren't ?

Jeremy Wariner, Kevin Little?

And pay much of their wages to watch black men make millions running and playing and then use the white men's money to take their wives and daughters.I say the black men have the better part of the deal.

jjjjjjj wrote:

The depth in white male sprinting is poor because not enough try it out or get the sprinting practice from football from an early age and they don't believe they can do it. They're psyched out to start.

In a thread full of ridiculous statements, yours might be the most ridiculous of all (and the fact that others also subscribe to this theory makes it no less absurd).

"psyched out" ?? No football practice?? please. There are TONS of completely or almost completely white football teams in pee wee and jr high/high school around the country, where the white kids get to be running backs, and wide receivers, and run the sprints during track. And then there are other kids doing soccer, and sprinting up a storm on those fields. Kids know they have great speed, and other people know they see a kid with great speed, immediately. Those white kids that have it, try the sprints, and they find out how good they are when they go to States, or even Regional meets. If they are legit, and can complete with the black sprinters, then they keep at it. If they can't .....yeah, they move on to something else.

Black sprinting dominance has NOTHING to do with some sort of racism against whites, or whites being told they can't do it. No way. Nearly ALL kids sprint and race each other as kids. Nearly ALL kids play sports with sprinting involved. If some kid is legit fast, then he will go into sprinting at some point. Most whites don't because.... they simply are not fast enough. No.....other....reason.

..."Why do you think Oregon has had people like Gardner, Todd, and Prandini but no equivalent males?"

LMFAO...this is typical coach d nonsense. The equivalent males at Oregon are Devon Allen, Mike Berry, Marcus Chambers, Centrowitz, Rupp, Cheserek, etc. Oh yes, coach d conveniently forgot about all those guys and their national championships and world medals.

Plain and simple, it has to do with the status of women in the US and Europe and access to training. The status of women in Africa and a lot of other countries (especially in the developing world) is not near what it is in the US. Additionally, Title 9 has had a very positive impact on US women's sports overall.

Awa wrote:

Every meet,championships,Olympics,it's a recurring theme.White women hold their own but white men struggle mightily.Why ?

Basically this:

As for why white women can sometimes compete?

The effect of the genetic differences is more pronounced in men.

West African heritage female athletes still dominate sprinting overall, just that you see the odd white women competing probably due to strength, height, etc.

Whereas in men's sprinting, white men are almost non-existent, bar Lemaitre for like, a year.

A great explanation! And now please, explain why US whites (both males and females) don't produce virtually any world class athletes in disciplines like short sprints, the long jump and the triple jump! The 200-million white population of USA must be seriously degenerated, that's sure, because even tiny European nations can produce solid athletes in these disciplines, while US whites can't.

Sports Physiologist wrote:

A great explanation! And now please, explain why US whites (both males and females) don't produce virtually any world class athletes in disciplines like short sprints, the long jump and the triple jump! The 200-million white population of USA must be seriously degenerated, that's sure, because even tiny European nations can produce solid athletes in these disciplines, while US whites can't.

Because they do but you obviously not paying attention.

Devon Allen won the 110m Hurdles last year at both NCAA & National champs, then got injured during the football season, out for the year.

John Teeters ran 6"52/10"07 over 60m/100m during NCAA season, got injured before the trials. He is the second fastest White male in the World.

Jenna Prandini won the 100m at NCAA this year, finished 6th at US Trials (10"92), and won the 200m at those same trials (22"20). How many girls in Europe (800 M+ people) can go faster than that ? She didn't make it out of the semis at Worlds.

The depth in the short sprints in the USA is the little bit higher than in your typical "tiny European nation" (I challenge you to find an European country big or not where 10"07 & 10"92 would not make the team).

A couple of theories to throw into this amusing thread:

Theory 1: The 'white' male gene pool, more than any other gene pool, has been changed by a series of wars, where too many of the fastest and bravest white men were cut down on the battlefield as they charged the enemy.

Theory 2: Most nations with a large percentage of 'white' people went through industrialisation a long time ago and all the societal changes during and since then. These changes have seen women become more and more assertive, aggressive, self-deterministic and self-sufficient. Alongside this, the qualities many women in these societies now look for in a male (breeding) partner have changed - intelligence, warmth and sensitivity have increased in importance while physical power and prowess in combat have greatly reduced in importance. The net result is that more children are born to physically inferior males, as a portion of the 'white' population, compared to earlier centuries. Thus in turn there is a lower and lower percentage of the 'white' population, especially amongst males, that is at the elite end of physical ability (especially power/speed).

Awa wrote:

Excuses,excuses.White men have been doping just as much as their women,

even during the Eastern block doping program.White men just don't have the same athletic ability as white women.A white man hasn't made a 100 final in the Olympics since 1980,white women have and have won medals.When was the last time a white man produced a world leading performance in any track event ? Several white women have.The last time a white man broke or set a

world record in a track event was Seb Coe 34 years ago.Several white women

have since then.White women just are better athletes,period.

But, is it fair to lump everyone with dark skin together on the "black" side of the line? Yes, generally, you can say that track is largely dominated by "blacks" (there are exceptions of course). But, no America/Western African/Carribean blacks win distance races and no East and North Africans are winning sprints. So, a subset of "blacks" are just as futile at distance as whites, and a subset of blacks are just as futile at sprints as whites. Justin Gatlin and Haile Hebrselassie are both "non white" but that's basically where the similarity ends.

truth they cant fathom wrote:

Why are blacks so terrible at chess?

Oh that is right their average 80 IQs, They are basically retarded.

No more so than the whites who aren't good at chess. Which is most.

Try harder.

Typical runner or sockpuppet wrote:

Middle class whites put a far greater value on female athletics than other cultures. So middle class white women have far less competition.

This. True then when OP was made, true now.

Valerie Borzov 1972, it's rare.

I guess Wariner doesn't count as a sprinter in some peoples minds.

They are doped to the GILLS

Are there differences between the percentage of men in Kenya and Ethiopia who at have taken up running seriously compared to the percentage of young women?

Jakub the champ! wrote:

Masculine white men have very large penises which hinders their sprinting form. Powerfully built white women dont suffer from such a disadvantage.

Pics?

Boom!!

Wariner, so obvious,

Cram was only 31 years ago.

Roger Black got silver behind MJ in 1996.

What about the Greek guy winning the 200m in Sydney, when a white guy does as much drugs as the Jamaicans or Bob Kersee's crew they can win. Everyone here is forgetting that the birth rates in white countries has collapsed and the average age in these countries is like forty or something.

this is so dumb. like half the guys in the 200 semifinals were white. and im sure initially it was like 500 blacks entered in the competition vs 50 whites.

the black speed is imaginary. so many whites at 19.7-19.8. only 2-3 blacks faster, which means theyre all basically the same.