MF Centro

torts r us wrote:

Bad Wigins wrote:

You've gotta be kidding, this is straight-up Orwell shit.

Anonymous internet posts are not taken seriously enough to harm anyone's reputation. Let alone whether anyone's reputation is worth millions of dollars. This is another example of frivolous tort out of control, lawyers out to destroy the web.

The lawyers brought suit on behalf of their clients. And a jury didn't think that the claims were frivolous. As usual, you've no idea what you're talking about.

So a greedy showboating lawyer with nothing to lose, and 12 average (aka stupid) Americans said it was right? Must be, then!

Bad Wigins wrote:

In the loop wrote:

This is a really great story. What a great precedent.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2134613/Couple-wins-14million-masking-anonymous-internet-trolls-labeled-sexual-deviants.html

You've gotta be kidding, this is straight-up Orwell shit.

Anonymous internet posts are not taken seriously enough to harm anyone's reputation. Let alone whether anyone's reputation is worth millions of dollars. This is another example of frivolous tort out of control, lawyers out to destroy the web.

The trolls should have used proxies. LOL

A Duck wrote:

The King Has Cheese wrote:

Daniel Winn is the other Oregon runner who went 3:57 at an Indoor meet in Seattle today. He broke Mac Fleet's Oregon school record, no small feat. Then just minutes later, he lost his record when both John Gregorek and King Cheserek broke Winn's record. It was a very big day for Oregon runners as they were setting records both in Seattle and NYC on the same day.

I spoke with Daniel shortly after his record setting run. He was upbeat and laughing about the fact that he'd probable hold an Oregon record for the shortest amount of time ever. He was totally laughing about it.

Are you sure he was laughing about it? Like totally laughing about it?

Your "civil" discussion revolves around unfounded doping claims anytime any of Salazar's athletes run fast?

Winner, winner...