100 if I had to just average 15 mph the whole time. 50 if I have to be going 15 mph or faster the entire time
100 if I had to just average 15 mph the whole time. 50 if I have to be going 15 mph or faster the entire time
the highlander wrote:
1:59.80 for 800, so I guess 805-810 meters?
Only if that was evenly paced. I interpreted the OP's question as an actual speed, not an average. I would bet most 1:59 guys aren't running sub 30 on either the final 200.
Once upon a time I could go 1200 - 1300 meters.
Today: 0 meters
But 0 has some sort of perfection to it so I will count that as progress.
cooptastic wrote:
the highlander wrote:
1:59.80 for 800, so I guess 805-810 meters?
Only if that was evenly paced. I interpreted the OP's question as an actual speed, not an average. I would bet most 1:59 guys aren't running sub 30 on either the final 200.
Is it with a running start? Otherwise, everyone would be 0m because of the required acceleration from 0mph to 15mph.
If it were a running start - how far and how long would it take most people to reach 15mph? That exertion will necessarily cut down on how far everyone could maintain once at 15mph.
I dont actually know, guessing around 150m
I can sneak a sub 15 100m rep lol [hey I'm 44]
but dont think I can get a sub 30 200m lol, and definitely cant break 60 in a 400m [72-ish would be current PR]
has been who never was wrote:
1200 meters - 1992 - Penn Relays DMR.
Now - maybe, just maybe 400 meters with a likely hospital visit immediately after.
That's impressive. I could do 1200m in 2000, did it in 1998. Last time I could do it for 400 was probably 2010 since I only do marathon training.
I pretty sure I could do it for 100m now. Might need a running start. I can regularly hit 33.x s for a 200m, but it feels the same as 27.x s did 20 years ago.
That's a 4:00 / mile pace, or basically a 60-second track lap.
Roughly:
800 m: 2:00
400 m: 1:00
200 m: 0:30
100 m: 0:15
Not easy.