Analyze This wrote:
Said the guy from the party who MADE MOVIES when they lost, Recount and even one about Palin showing they can be both sore losers AND sore winners. So don't you whine about anyone being a sore loser. Nobody had ever been re elected with stats as bad as obummer.
Not my party.
My name is Lance wrote:
"Absolutely moronic. You cannot deny that Obama had a bucket of shit handed to him and that he has been successful at reducing the volume of excrement. Maybe he's not been able to do it as fast as your selfish little self would like, but he's undeniably turned things around. Make up some more "facts", dumbas$."
'zactly - thanks for proving my point. 1000 years from now, when historians puzzle over how the US could self destruct, maybe they'll come across your post.. If I was Darwinist, I could point to you as a fine example of how a nation implodes, one idiotic voter at a time
Thanks for proving me correct. You are indeed an absolute moron. Cripes, you don't even know what Darwinism is. That sound you hear every time you open your mouth is intelligent people laughing at your idiocy. Very entertaining. Please don't stop.
TexasStaredown wrote:
Remember the sequester was HIS idea and Bob Woodward pointed that out.
You say that as if its a bad thing.
Here's some more truth for you...enjoy!
"Measured in sheer legislative tonnage, what Obama got done in his first two years is stunning. Health care reform. The takeover and turnaround of the auto industry. The biggest economic stimulus in history. Sweeping new regulations of Wall Street. A tough new set of consumer protections on the credit card industry. A vast expansion of national service. Net neutrality. The greatest increase in wilderness protection in fifteen years. A revolutionary reform to student aid. Signing the New START treaty with Russia. The ending of “don’t ask, don’t tell.”
Even over the past year, when he was bogged down in budget fights with the Tea Party-controlled GOP House, Obama still managed to squeeze out a few domestic policy victories, including a $1.2 trillion deficit reduction deal and the most sweeping overhaul of food safety laws in more than seventy years. More impressively, on the foreign policy front he ended the war in Iraq, began the drawdown in Afghanistan, helped to oust Gaddafi in Libya and usher out Mubarak in Egypt, orchestrated new military and commercial alliances as a hedge against China, and tightened sanctions against Iran over its nukes.
Oh, and he shifted counterterrorism strategies to target Osama bin Laden and then ordered the risky raid that killed him.
That Obama has done all this while also steering the country out of what might have been a second Great Depression would seem to have made him already, just three years into his first term, a serious candidate for greatness."
You really are stupid.
Obama had the idea for the sequester. now that it has gone to that he is blaming (once again someone else) the mean ole Republicans for it getting to this stage. It was to happen on January 1 but the Republican house gave his two more months to avoid it! Hypocrisy.
You, under a different handle, badmouth Reagan but your Obama has likened himself to Reagan. Bad or good. Hypocrisy?
He didn't do jack his first two years and he even had both houses!
People like you are proof that liberalism is a mental disorder BUT the good news is, liberals are unhappy people with lifespans shorter than conservatives.
Inflation and taxation wrote:
[quote]TexasStaredown wrote:
For all you die hard liberals, why don't you figure out who repealed glass steagall and what that led to. Can you say financial crisis? Can you say banking casino? Can you say no risk (accept to the tax payer of course) unlimited leverage bank gambling with bailouts for a failed bet?
Learn some history:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass–Steagall_Act
I'm no liberal, but glass steagall was repealed by a gop congress as a bipartisan act. Don't try to imply that it was a Democrat idea. if that is your version of history, you can see why journalists, who deal with facts all day, are mostly democrats.
imagine if the races were reversed in this video... oh the uproar of white girls beating up a pregnant black girl, we'd hear about it for weeks.
of course when it's blacks beating up a white pregnant girl, the media yawns.
TexasStaredown wrote:
You really are stupid.
Obama had the idea for the sequester. now that it has gone to that he is blaming (once again someone else) the mean ole Republicans for it getting to this stage. It was to happen on January 1 but the Republican house gave his two more months to avoid it! Hypocrisy.
You, under a different handle, badmouth Reagan but your Obama has likened himself to Reagan. Bad or good. Hypocrisy?
He didn't do jack his first two years and he even had both houses!
People like you are proof that liberalism is a mental disorder BUT the good news is, liberals are unhappy people with lifespans shorter than conservatives.
A. There is no hypocrisy. Obama and the Repubs both are knee deep in this. They blame each other, but I blame them.
B. Different handle? You have me confused with someone else. I haven't posted about Reagan.
C. Didn't do Jack? Did you miss my previous post? The guy accomplished things at a historic rate. You don't have to like what he did, but you're delusional if you think he didn't do anything,
D. I'm not a liberal.
Here's a different opinion:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/02/david-gregory-obama-washington-media_n_2797311.html
fair enough wrote:
reality has a liberal bias.
The MSM, which votes for democrats about 90% of the time, shares this POV and reflects it in their reporting. For example, this story:
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/u-lurches-budget-crisis-spending-cuts-imminent-005547865--business.htmllol lol lol lol wrote:
fair enough wrote:reality has a liberal bias.
The MSM, which votes for democrats about 90% of the time, shares this POV and reflects it in their reporting. For example, this story:
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/u-lurches-budget-crisis-spending-cuts-imminent-005547865--business.html
And again, maybe it should tell you something when 90% of the people that examine politics for a living share a certain point of view.
And by the way, I see nothing particularly biased about the article you cite -- it is based primarily on polling data.
agip wrote:
Inflation and taxation wrote:[quote]TexasStaredown wrote:
For all you die hard liberals, why don't you figure out who repealed glass steagall and what that led to. Can you say financial crisis? Can you say banking casino? Can you say no risk (accept to the tax payer of course) unlimited leverage bank gambling with bailouts for a failed bet?
Learn some history:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass–Steagall_Act
I'm no liberal, but glass steagall was repealed by a gop congress as a bipartisan act. Don't try to imply that it was a Democrat idea. if that is your version of history, you can see why journalists, who deal with facts all day, are mostly democrats.
Billy Clinton
You say the media deals in facts? No one likes it when their side is proven wrong. This gives opportunity to slant/change the course of the truth.
Three percent of the national media say they attend ny form of worship/religious services. How would they know or agree with the 60% of America that does. they look down their noses at these hard working, God-fearing people. They are a joke to them. They don't report the news fairly and for years we have been given their slant. Problem was, too many people became uninformed.
This president has all the workings of a Hitler, Stalin and Mao.
Journalists don't deal in facts because "journalistic integrity" is dead.
Speaking of facts, can you provide some supporting evidence to your 3% and 60% claims? It will sure help us take you seriously. Thanks!
TexasStaredown wrote:
You say the media deals in facts? No one likes it when their side is proven wrong. This gives opportunity to slant/change the course of the truth.
Three percent of the national media say they attend ny form of worship/religious services. How would they know or agree with the 60% of America that does. they look down their noses at these hard working, God-fearing people. They are a joke to them. They don't report the news fairly and for years we have been given their slant. Problem was, too many people became uninformed.
This president has all the workings of a Hitler, Stalin and Mao.
Journalists don't deal in facts because "journalistic integrity" is dead.
TexasStaredown wrote:
This president has all the workings of a Hitler, Stalin and Mao.
You just revealed just how full of nonsense you are.
Nuytre wrote:
Speaking of facts, can you provide some supporting evidence to your 3% and 60% claims? It will sure help us take you seriously. Thanks!
bump