Rupp 7:30.18!!!

BroPlease. wrote:

So Komen Runs 7:20 OUTSIDE and is widely accepted as a massive user of performance enhancers. Rupp runs ~9 seconds slower indoors, and we no one brings "it" up here? lolololol

Umm, Komens outdoor time is leagues ahead of the #2 time.

Rupp just ran the #7 fastest indoor of all time. Not a great slam Bro, but thanks for the libel.

BroPlease. wrote:

So Komen Runs 7:20 OUTSIDE and is widely accepted as a massive user of performance enhancers. Rupp runs ~9 seconds slower indoors, and we no one brings "it" up here? lolololol

for reference

and the win!!! Holy Shizz

rupp-certified saladbar wrote:

It's called "TUEing."

Hyperthyroidism has been shown to increase 2,3-bpg levels.

indeeders! wrote: Rupp just ran the #7 fastest indoor of all time. Not a great slam Bro, but thanks for the libel.

Epic failure on your part, understanding libel.

CoachJ wrote:

rupp-certified saladbar wrote:

It's called "TUEing."

Hyperthyroidism has been shown to increase 2,3-bpg levels.

Link?

J.R. wrote:

The free internet gives us the chance to come out of the dark ages and parochial corporate coverage. FT is trying to insure the crappy coverage continues forever.

A better solution would be to provide their coverage, but with no restrictions on anyone else doing the same. Service should be based on value, not exclusionary practices.

^^^THIS!

+1000

The old corporate fascist dictatorship coverage of sporting events needs to end! Let the players stream away! It is not like the old land-line phone days where telephone monopolies were somewhat 'justified'.

[quote]smallballinthatspopwarner wrote:

is itunes ruining music because they make you pay for songs?

Since when does iTunes have EXCLUSIONARY distribution rights for music?!?

End all EXCLUSIONARY distribution rights for sporting events, especially for college events in publically supported venues!!!

Flotrack = garbage

stats guy wrote:

BroPlease. wrote:

So Komen Runs 7:20 OUTSIDE and is widely accepted as a massive user of performance enhancers. Rupp runs ~9 seconds slower indoors, and we no one brings "it" up here? lolololol

for reference

Komen was big time gased up that summer. He was doing cray things!

anon amie wrote:

CoachJ wrote:

Hyperthyroidism has been shown to increase 2,3-bpg levels.

Link?

Here is a link:

González-Cinca N; Pérez de la Ossa P, Carreras J, Climent F (2004). ."Effects of thyroid hormone and hypoxia on 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate, bisphosphoglycerate synthase and phosphoglycerate mutase in rabbit erythroblasts and reticulocytes in vivo"..

Pre-race interview with Rupp:

http://www.tv4play.se/program/sporten?video_id=2282161

He mentions he hopes to beat Mo this year.

js1258 wrote:

anon amie wrote:

Link?

Here is a link:

González-Cinca N; Pérez de la Ossa P, Carreras J, Climent F (2004). ."Effects of thyroid hormone and hypoxia on 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate, bisphosphoglycerate synthase and phosphoglycerate mutase in rabbit erythroblasts and reticulocytes in vivo"..

uh. no it's not.

Anyone find a video of the race yet?

Are you saying the article doesn't say what he says it does or that you don't know how to find an article when the title and authors are given?http://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/80897

doo doo wrote:

js1258 wrote:

Here is a link:

González-Cinca N; Pérez de la Ossa P, Carreras J, Climent F (2004). ."Effects of thyroid hormone and hypoxia on 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate, bisphosphoglycerate synthase and phosphoglycerate mutase in rabbit erythroblasts and reticulocytes in vivo"..

uh. no it's not.

I think Galen was inspired b/c he thought the meet was named after HIM:

"2013 IAAF XL Galan Indoor Meeting Stockholm"

great job Galen

amazing time

The 1500 record is 3:26; if your approach was correct, the 3000 record would be 6:52, not 7:20. The doubling rather than adding 7.29% to the distance makes the error of simple extrapolation more apparent but the effect applies there to. The standard adjustment for the increase of 7.29% in distance is to add 8% (some use 7.9+%) in time. No one ever seems to think that the record time for the 2000 should be just 33.33% more than the record time for the 1500 but a surprising number of people seem to think it is ok if the differential 7+%. The exact same factors are involved. The larger the differential (in percent) the larger the difference in pace and thus the larger the slowdown. Think of it as a continuous function.

henrybish wrote:

Pre-race interview with Rupp:

http://www.tv4play.se/program/sporten?video_id=2282161

He mentions he hopes to beat Mo this year.

Good catch!