is there? i never watched the trial and maybe Casey is guilty but it made me so pissed how much attention this trial was getting and how much anger people had that she was definitely guilty that i was actually happy she was found not guilty.
The fact she was found not guilty sort of teaches a lesson to all of you who were duped by the media.
I agree with this. Except the part that maybe she was
guilty. She was found to be innocent, so she's innocent.
Her parents should of not been allowed in the courtroom day after day as they had "wishy washy" testimony that I think hurt the prosecutions case. Especially with her Dad apparently lying about his affair...But, the mother and brother were not too much better. I'm sure she and OJ will team up to find the real killers....
So the producers of the new show offered Nancy G the chance for an interview and she turned them down, but is willing to spout off against the show to other outlets? Just take your decade-old L with dignity, lady. You are far from the only person who got this case “wrong” in the sense that your opinion on what happened differed from the final verdict. Let it go, or if you can’t, make your case to the people who made the show, not some friendly outlet you like better.
A jury acquits OJ Simpson in 1994 because they are too stupid to understand DNA evidence. 17 years and 47,000 CSI episodes later, a jury acquits Casey Anthony because the are too stupid to understand the case without DNA evidence.
Remmeber kids, juries are made up of the people who are too stupid to get out of jury duty.
I have thought about this a lot in life... I have known and talked with countless people at this point who were too dumb to do or think through almost literally anything. That someone like that could end up being responsible for whether a killer receives justice or not is terrifying. Should be some sort of minimal intelligence test required to serve on jury duty.
And yes, Casey Anthony was CLEARLY involved in the death of her daughter. I think sometimes "reasonable doubt" is taken a little too far.
Also, OJ got off because of race. That's literally the only reason.
I have watched almost half of the first episode and Casey is clearly a sociopath but also really tries to squelch her anger but one can see how full of hostility she is.
A jury acquits OJ Simpson in 1994 because they are too stupid to understand DNA evidence. 17 years and 47,000 CSI episodes later, a jury acquits Casey Anthony because the are too stupid to understand the case without DNA evidence.
Remmeber kids, juries are made up of the people who are too stupid to get out of jury duty.
I have thought about this a lot in life... I have known and talked with countless people at this point who were too dumb to do or think through almost literally anything. That someone like that could end up being responsible for whether a killer receives justice or not is terrifying. Should be some sort of minimal intelligence test required to serve on jury duty.
And yes, Casey Anthony was CLEARLY involved in the death of her daughter. I think sometimes "reasonable doubt" is taken a little too far.
Also, OJ got off because of race. That's literally the only reason.
O.J. was found NOT GUILTY at his 1995 trial because prosecutors/law enforcement failed to prove their case. Challenge me and I will review errors by prosecutors and law enforcement. Prosecutors and law enforcement get used to daily defeating overly worked and poorly funded public defenders. O.J's attorneys did an excellent job, even the ones who's only job was keeping O.J.'s mood inline.
