rojo wrote:
Johnson's job on the BBC is to analyze track and field. I don't understand how his businesss failure impacts his ability to do that. He's not really interviewing athletes. He can still easily analyze the races.
This is deliberately obtuse.
Michael Johnson is the CEO of a business that entered into financial agreements with many athletes. His business venture has failed to hold up its end of those agreements and now has millions of dollars in outstanding obligations to top athletes, many of who will be at Worlds. It's safe to assume Johnson is facing legal proceedings over those outstanding obligations.
In light of this, it makes perfect sense that the BBC does not want Johnson on its worlds coverage. No news agency wants an analyst who's being sued for nonpayment by the athletes he's supposed to be discussing. The optics of that are terrible, even before we get into how Grand Slam will obviously be brought up during the broadcast when discussing how athletes have performed this season.
If Johnson was smart he would've told everyone that he was stepping away from the BBC to continue working on repaying athletes. He was delusional if he thought he would be welcomed back to athletics as a top analyst like nothing had happened. Nobody's saying he's banned for life, but he has to make meaningful progress towards solving this before coming back as a talking head.