Without resorting to campaign talking points, what is the argument for making Trump POTUS again? During his first term, he only managed to pass one major piece of legislation for tax cuts. Most of his executive orders were shot down by the courts and his border wall wasn’t completed. He does not appear to be a fiscal or social conservative that I can see. He seems to enjoy being the center of attention more than being an effective leader and statesman.
So what is the appeal? We need thoughtful and experienced people running the country. His business record and his public persona do not lend themselves to these criteria. I ask this as a serious question, not a troll. What logical reasons would cause me to cast my vote for Trump?
Ridding the country of 21million invaders to begin with. No more men in female sports. The bad guys out there like Putin get he's as crazy as they are, he is feared and we need that.
He'll bring prices down, will save social security. And he has a great second in command in Vance. And the guy doesn't take any BS ,we need that.
What has she done, yep......nothing! Pullling out of Afganistan like we did, that was so wrong. Allowing this invasion is just as wrong. Blame her, We can't take 4 more years of this, so Trump to the rescue.
This post was edited 2 minutes after it was posted.
Have you looked at how the US is doing comped to other G7 nations?
yes my city is safe in 2019 and is safe now.
trump talked to Republicans to torpedo bipartisan border bill that Republicans thought while not perfect would have been effective.
we have historically abnormally low j employment and the inflation rate has dropped to 2.4 percent in September
what Trump policies do you think will lower inflation?
If Trump was president he would be talking up that the stock market is at record highs.
Other G7 nations locked down harder than we did, and are paying for it now. You can thank the Rs for fighting back against lockdown and giving us an edge over the rest of the "civilized world". You can also thank TRUMP for being the first to bring a safe, effective vaccine to bear with Operation Warp Speed.
The "bipartisan border bill" meant to save face for the current election cycle was too little, too late. Clearly, Trump's stay-in-place policies were working until Biden reversed them when he took office, sending a clear signal for the floodgates to open. Ds are weak as all gitout on the border, and everyone (and their brother) knows it.
Inflation rate dropping is of little consolation when the prices of everything have gone up 20% over the last few years. My household makes double the average household income and we're feeling it. If we are feeling it, then I can't imagine what it's doing to households that make significantly less than ours. Although we are not hurting, we are much more careful about how and where we spend our money.
Low unemployment is good, I'll hand you that -- people are finally getting off their rumps after a prolonged "covid break", probably because they can't afford to sit around any more. That's one positive aspect of the desperation so many must be feeling in this economy.
Encouraging domestic oil and natural gas production will go a long way toward lowering inflation. Energy is the base cost of everything we consume. We're not doing the environment any favors by buying oil from our enemies, we're simply having someone else do our dirty work so that we can pretend we're "environmentally enlightened". Produce the energy here, save ourselves some money, and don't put money in the pockets of our enemies.
Stock market is at (or near) record highs, but much of that is due to inflation. We're paying more for things than we ever have, which makes companies' assets more valuable and their stock price higher. Apparently it has outperformed inflation, which is better than not, but I would have preferred lower inflation and more modest gains in the stock market because that stock market money is not in my pocket at the moment, but I'm paying the high cost of inflation right now.
Coincidentally, I'm paying significantly more in property taxes than I ever have, as my home value has risen overnight. It may be "great" for me, but it's not great for anyone buying a house, and I'd prefer that if we're going to have a party, that I not be the only one dancing.
One of the reasons I am voting for Trump is because I will not reward the Democratic Party that has sidestepped all norms to literally foist one of their weakest leaders, Kamala Harris, upon our nation. They must think that we don't want Trump to be in office so badly that we'll vote anyone they choose into office. No, forget that. They deserve the L for their brazen attempt to subvert democratic norms in plain side, aided and abetted directly by the mainstream media. You know, the same folks who protected us from knowing that Biden was not cogent.
Also, Trump strengthened NATO by embarrassing other nations to pay their fair share. He was given full credit for this by the sitting president of NATO, despite our "journalists" claiming that Trump somehow undermined NATO.
There was not a peep out of the Middle East when Trump was in office. In fact, Trump played a big role in orchestrating the Abraham Accords between Israel and arab nations.
Iran hates Trump for good reason. Unlike Biden, who early on tried to send them more pallets of cash and then embarrassingly had to withdraw the funds almost immediately, Trump killed Soleimani. That sent a clear message to Tehran.
The embarrassing withdrawal from Afghanistan would have never happened. If Trump would have been in charge, and if things were going as poorly as they did under Biden's direction, he would have went back in and smoked the Taliban. He would not tolerate the United States being disgraced in that way.
Russia amassing its war machine on Ukraine's borders with Trump at the helm? Not a chance. That was like a slow moving train wreck with Biden pussyfooting around and doing nothing. He finally grew some balls after it was too late, but then it was too late.
No, we need a strong leader who is not in cahoots with the media and whoever is running the country right now. Make no mistake, if Kamala is elected, it will not be she who is running the country. It will be whomever has been pulling Biden's strings.
Wow, you wrote all that in support of a dementing malignant narcissist felon and grifter.
Funding wars in Ukraine, Lebanon, Yemen, Syria, and likely Iran
Massive censorship.
Lockdowns.
Jab mandates.
Russiagate
Lawfare against Trump and other targets.
Criminalizing dissent (Jan 6th and protests against genocide).
Assassination attempts against Trump (????)
That's why
this is a good list so start. There are other reasons why trump is the better option.
There is not a single thing on that list that explains why Trump is a better option. It's just a list of mostly distorted, vague, or flat-out untrue events that, even if true, weren't within Harris' sphere of control.
Yeah Cuomo is definitely the Dems Presidential candidate.
He really does own the party 🙄
All right, how about Kamala Harris? Certainly a grifter -- were those funds in the war chest really meant for her greedy hands? Narcissist? Certainly, she think more highly of herself than others do. Yes, I think she qualifies. Felon? Technically not convicted of anything, but certainly of low moral character based on her personal choices...I call it a wash.
3. **Polarizing Leadership Style**: - Many view Trump’s leadership style as authoritarian, with a tendency to undermine democratic institutions, such as the press and the judiciary. - His handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and response to civil unrest has been widely criticized as inadequate and divisive.
You offer a lot of reasons, but you miss the boat on the issue with Trump’s polarizing style, probably because you come at it from a Liberal viewpoint.
Trump’s character, style, and general leadership abilities are a liability for the country generally and for the Republican party and conservative values/policies more specifically.
There are a couple of things nearly all of his supporters call major achievements of his presidency: Tax cuts and conservative judges. But the truth is that any — quite literally any — Republican president was likely to get that, especially considering the legislative majority Trump had for half his term.
But his style appeals very, very strongly to a lot of people, but they’re a relatively small part of the electorate. They want someone who looks like he’s fighting for them. And he’s naturally pugnacious, so it always looks like he’s fighting.
But he’s a showman. It’s the pro wrestling candidate. He talks tough and tries to act tough (and in the awful assassination attempt, actually acted pretty tough), and says he’ll make it better.
But he’s not actually invested in governing, he doesn’t know policy, he’s not engaged in any of the work, and so he can’t get stuff done. He is even a liability in these areas.
Just as there are rabid fans of Trump, there are also rabid Lefties who can’t be convinced and who have bad ideas. How do you get legislative majorities, enact good laws, and get things done? Have better ideas and do a better job of communicating them to the public.
Trump’s base things he tells the truth (or don’t care that he’s lying), but they’re always going to be with him anyway. But an enormous percentage of Americans don’t trust him.
And his style and character? Take an issue like the border. You can find reasonable criticisms suggesting that Trump’s actual border actions were not significantly more inhumane than Obama’s or Biden’s. Why does he get tagged with that? He says enough things that are actually at least dog-whistle-level racist, cruel, or false that a significant percentage of the population associates that perspective with him, and it colors their perception of his policy (sometimes fairly, sometimes not). What? You think it’s just the news media smearing him? They don’t need to; it comes out of his own mouth. And even if/when they did or do, he’s giving them ample fodder every day to make it plausible. And so it’s easy for many in the population to be receptive to bad ideas from the other side, just as long as they’re not Trump.
On the pandemic? If you had a President who communicated an effective plan rather than saying stupid things like “it will just go away” (and yes, of course it will, technically — a point that underscores how stupid a comment it is rather than redeems it) and vacuously spitballing in briefings, the the effective President could show a steady hand that inspires confidence in the populace. If you inspire confidence, then it’s easier to minimize things like lockdowns, etc. Blame any number of Democrats if you want, especially the most hypocritical ones. But I’m not even a DeSantis fan, and the country would’ve been much better off if DeSantis had been president instead of Trump.
And any success for Trump just makes it more and more likely that dumb, disengaged, lower character candidates will be more and more common (and they’ve been far too common from both major parties for far too long; Trump is just the worst of them and brings out the worst in his lackeys and his opponents).
I’m really astonished that more Republicans aren’t strongly anti-Trump. He’s an enormous barrier to the sucess of the Republican party and the fostering of conservative values and policies in the US.
Funding wars in Ukraine, Lebanon, Yemen, Syria, and likely Iran
Massive censorship.
Lockdowns.
Jab mandates.
Russiagate
Lawfare against Trump and other targets.
Criminalizing dissent (Jan 6th and protests against genocide).
Assassination attempts against Trump (????)
That's why
Move to Russia you pro Putin wacko. Lets review your points.
Inflation is high because of recovery from the covid pandemic.
I would note you call it funding genocide in Gaza and the West Bank however it is just funding war in Ukraine rather than self defense.
What censorship are you referring to here. If you mean Trump threatening witnesses not being allowed and it has been established as illegal.
Lockdowns were to protect the American people from a virus. I would note that many people that feel the same way as you about the lockdowns believe the earth is flat and that the pandemic never happened.
Lawfare against Trump. Trump being charged with tax fraud and sexual assault is not politically motivated. The classified documents case was clearly illegal. The difference in the documents case between Trump and Biden is Biden turned them over before the government requested them. Trump lied about having them and needed to be raided to get them back.
Criminalizing dissent? That was a violent attack. Those people waved confederate flags on one of the pillars of our democracy. It was a blatantly illegal attempt to override and delay the peaceful transfer of power. Please prove it was peaceful and I will retract this statement.
Assassination attempts against Trump. There is no proof this is being caused by the Biden Administration however it is weird that it has happened twice.
Name some of the other politicians who are dementing malignant narcissist felons and grifters.
How about Andrew Cuomo, darling of the left?
You next!
You said "most politicians," yet you could only come up with one name — and he doesn't even fit the criteria. Cuomo ain't dementing, he might be a narcissist (but he's surely ain't a malignant narcissist), I don't believe he has been convicted of any felons, and he hasn't tried to sell me crypto, NFTs, crap sneakers and a fraudulent university education.
Without resorting to campaign talking points, what is the argument for making Trump POTUS again? During his first term, he only managed to pass one major piece of legislation for tax cuts. Most of his executive orders were shot down by the courts and his border wall wasn’t completed. He does not appear to be a fiscal or social conservative that I can see. He seems to enjoy being the center of attention more than being an effective leader and statesman.
So what is the appeal? We need thoughtful and experienced people running the country. His business record and his public persona do not lend themselves to these criteria. I ask this as a serious question, not a troll. What logical reasons would cause me to cast my vote for Trump?
Ridding the country of 21million invaders to begin with. No more men in female sports. The bad guys out there like Putin get he's as crazy as they are, he is feared and we need that.
He'll bring prices down, will save social security. And he has a great second in command in Vance. And the guy doesn't take any BS ,we need that.
What has she done, yep......nothing! Pullling out of Afganistan like we did, that was so wrong. Allowing this invasion is just as wrong. Blame her, We can't take 4 more years of this, so Trump to the rescue.
Republicans have proposed removing social security.
3. **Polarizing Leadership Style**: - Many view Trump’s leadership style as authoritarian, with a tendency to undermine democratic institutions, such as the press and the judiciary. - His handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and response to civil unrest has been widely criticized as inadequate and divisive.
You offer a lot of reasons, but you miss the boat on the issue with Trump’s polarizing style, probably because you come at it from a Liberal viewpoint.
Trump’s character, style, and general leadership abilities are a liability for the country generally and for the Republican party and conservative values/policies more specifically.
There are a couple of things nearly all of his supporters call major achievements of his presidency: Tax cuts and conservative judges. But the truth is that any — quite literally any — Republican president was likely to get that, especially considering the legislative majority Trump had for half his term.
But his style appeals very, very strongly to a lot of people, but they’re a relatively small part of the electorate. They want someone who looks like he’s fighting for them. And he’s naturally pugnacious, so it always looks like he’s fighting.
But he’s a showman. It’s the pro wrestling candidate. He talks tough and tries to act tough (and in the awful assassination attempt, actually acted pretty tough), and says he’ll make it better.
But he’s not actually invested in governing, he doesn’t know policy, he’s not engaged in any of the work, and so he can’t get stuff done. He is even a liability in these areas.
Just as there are rabid fans of Trump, there are also rabid Lefties who can’t be convinced and who have bad ideas. How do you get legislative majorities, enact good laws, and get things done? Have better ideas and do a better job of communicating them to the public.
Trump’s base things he tells the truth (or don’t care that he’s lying), but they’re always going to be with him anyway. But an enormous percentage of Americans don’t trust him.
And his style and character? Take an issue like the border. You can find reasonable criticisms suggesting that Trump’s actual border actions were not significantly more inhumane than Obama’s or Biden’s. Why does he get tagged with that? He says enough things that are actually at least dog-whistle-level racist, cruel, or false that a significant percentage of the population associates that perspective with him, and it colors their perception of his policy (sometimes fairly, sometimes not). What? You think it’s just the news media smearing him? They don’t need to; it comes out of his own mouth. And even if/when they did or do, he’s giving them ample fodder every day to make it plausible. And so it’s easy for many in the population to be receptive to bad ideas from the other side, just as long as they’re not Trump.
On the pandemic? If you had a President who communicated an effective plan rather than saying stupid things like “it will just go away” (and yes, of course it will, technically — a point that underscores how stupid a comment it is rather than redeems it) and vacuously spitballing in briefings, the the effective President could show a steady hand that inspires confidence in the populace. If you inspire confidence, then it’s easier to minimize things like lockdowns, etc. Blame any number of Democrats if you want, especially the most hypocritical ones. But I’m not even a DeSantis fan, and the country would’ve been much better off if DeSantis had been president instead of Trump.
And any success for Trump just makes it more and more likely that dumb, disengaged, lower character candidates will be more and more common (and they’ve been far too common from both major parties for far too long; Trump is just the worst of them and brings out the worst in his lackeys and his opponents).
I’m really astonished that more Republicans aren’t strongly anti-Trump. He’s an enormous barrier to the sucess of the Republican party and the fostering of conservative values and policies in the US.
Slowly but surely it is happening. The Cheney's, Kinzinger, Romney and others have gone on the record hard against Trump.
You said "most politicians," yet you could only come up with one name — and he doesn't even fit the criteria. Cuomo ain't dementing, he might be a narcissist (but he's surely ain't a malignant narcissist), I don't believe he has been convicted of any felons, and he hasn't tried to sell me ----, ---- crap sneakers and a fraudulent university education.
Sorry, I was going to add Gavin Newsom, but I didn't want to make you cry. In any case, I'm not going to do all the work.
When Trump wins the presidency, you may find that some of your heroes will be tried an convicted of various crimes. Will you accept the verdicts? If not, then I ask you why I should pay any heed to the various cases against Trump that could not be more clearly politically motivated.
Anyway, do you have anything productive to add to this conversation? So far you've added a few epithets and nothing of substance. I have a yard to mow. Not only that, you got me banned for the use of certain spam related words when I quoted your trash.
Yeah Cuomo is definitely the Dems Presidential candidate.
He really does own the party 🙄
All right, how about Kamala Harris? Certainly a grifter -- were those funds in the war chest really meant for her greedy hands? Narcissist? Certainly, she think more highly of herself than others do. Yes, I think she qualifies. Felon? Technically not convicted of anything, but certainly of low moral character based on her personal choices...I call it a wash.
Call it a wash? You're hilarious, and not a very good troll. A very weak effort on your part.
For your edification, I've helpfully included the DSM-5 guide for narcissist personality disorder.
Five out of nine of the criteria need to be present to meet the diagnosis of NPD. One of the candidates for president of the United States clicks all nine:
The nine criteria are:
DSM 1: Grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievement and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements);
DSM 2: Fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love;
DSM 3: Belief in being “special” and unique and can only be understood by, or should be associated with, other special or high-status people (or institutions);
DSM 4: Requires excessive admiration;
DSM 5: Sense of entitlement, i.e., unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her expectations;
DSM 6: Interpersonally exploitive, i.e., takes advantage of others to achieve his/her own ends;
DSM 7: Lacks empathy; is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others;
DSM 8: Envious of others or believes that others are envious of him/her;
I resent being deemed problematic and I don't like where progressive society is headed since it diminishes my role. A Trump victory may not help in the long run, but it will be disruptive short term and give me some satisfaction watching those with TDS lose their minds.
Cool, we found one of those "own the libs" guys that people talk about.
Ridding the country of 21million invaders to begin with. No more men in female sports. The bad guys out there like Putin get he's as crazy as they are, he is feared and we need that.
He'll bring prices down, will save social security. And he has a great second in command in Vance. And the guy doesn't take any BS ,we need that.
What has she done, yep......nothing! Pullling out of Afganistan like we did, that was so wrong. Allowing this invasion is just as wrong. Blame her, We can't take 4 more years of this, so Trump to the rescue.
I know you're old and basically giving up at this point, but you should really consider talking to a therapist. No need to be an closeted, angry, bigoted old man
You said "most politicians," yet you could only come up with one name — and he doesn't even fit the criteria. Cuomo ain't dementing, he might be a narcissist (but he's surely ain't a malignant narcissist), I don't believe he has been convicted of any felons, and he hasn't tried to sell me ----, ---- crap sneakers and a fraudulent university education.
Sorry, I was going to add Gavin Newsom, but I didn't want to make you cry. In any case, I'm not going to do all the work.
When Trump wins the presidency, you may find that some of your heroes will be tried an convicted of various crimes. Will you accept the verdicts? If not, then I ask you why I should pay any heed to the various cases against Trump that could not be more clearly politically motivated.
Anyway, do you have anything productive to add to this conversation? So far you've added a few epithets and nothing of substance. I have a yard to mow. Not only that, you got me banned for the use of certain spam related words when I quoted your trash.
Heroes? I never said any politician was my hero. In fact, I find that the profession tends to attract seriously broken and flawed individuals and I would never associate with most of them.
Will I accept the convictions of individuals who have gone through the grand-jury and court process? Of course I will. Again, they ain't my heroes (I actually could give a shyt about them), and I would love to see them convicted if they committed crimes. Isn't that how it's supposed to work?
3. **Polarizing Leadership Style**: - Many view Trump’s leadership style as authoritarian, with a tendency to undermine democratic institutions, such as the press and the judiciary. - His handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and response to civil unrest has been widely criticized as inadequate and divisive.
You offer a lot of reasons, but you miss the boat on the issue with Trump’s polarizing style, probably because you come at it from a Liberal viewpoint.
Trump’s character, style, and general leadership abilities are a liability for the country generally and for the Republican party and conservative values/policies more specifically.
There are a couple of things nearly all of his supporters call major achievements of his presidency: Tax cuts and conservative judges. But the truth is that any — quite literally any — Republican president was likely to get that, especially considering the legislative majority Trump had for half his term.
But his style appeals very, very strongly to a lot of people, but they’re a relatively small part of the electorate. They want someone who looks like he’s fighting for them. And he’s naturally pugnacious, so it always looks like he’s fighting.
But he’s a showman. It’s the pro wrestling candidate. He talks tough and tries to act tough (and in the awful assassination attempt, actually acted pretty tough), and says he’ll make it better.
But he’s not actually invested in governing, he doesn’t know policy, he’s not engaged in any of the work, and so he can’t get stuff done. He is even a liability in these areas.
Just as there are rabid fans of Trump, there are also rabid Lefties who can’t be convinced and who have bad ideas. How do you get legislative majorities, enact good laws, and get things done? Have better ideas and do a better job of communicating them to the public.
Trump’s base things he tells the truth (or don’t care that he’s lying), but they’re always going to be with him anyway. But an enormous percentage of Americans don’t trust him.
And his style and character? Take an issue like the border. You can find reasonable criticisms suggesting that Trump’s actual border actions were not significantly more inhumane than Obama’s or Biden’s. Why does he get tagged with that? He says enough things that are actually at least dog-whistle-level racist, cruel, or false that a significant percentage of the population associates that perspective with him, and it colors their perception of his policy (sometimes fairly, sometimes not). What? You think it’s just the news media smearing him? They don’t need to; it comes out of his own mouth. And even if/when they did or do, he’s giving them ample fodder every day to make it plausible. And so it’s easy for many in the population to be receptive to bad ideas from the other side, just as long as they’re not Trump.
On the pandemic? If you had a President who communicated an effective plan rather than saying stupid things like “it will just go away” (and yes, of course it will, technically — a point that underscores how stupid a comment it is rather than redeems it) and vacuously spitballing in briefings, the the effective President could show a steady hand that inspires confidence in the populace. If you inspire confidence, then it’s easier to minimize things like lockdowns, etc. Blame any number of Democrats if you want, especially the most hypocritical ones. But I’m not even a DeSantis fan, and the country would’ve been much better off if DeSantis had been president instead of Trump.
And any success for Trump just makes it more and more likely that dumb, disengaged, lower character candidates will be more and more common (and they’ve been far too common from both major parties for far too long; Trump is just the worst of them and brings out the worst in his lackeys and his opponents).
I’m really astonished that more Republicans aren’t strongly anti-Trump. He’s an enormous barrier to the sucess of the Republican party and the fostering of conservative values and policies in the US.
Clearly what we need are better politicians. We need a more centrist style of leadership by both parties. Currently we have two parties that are extreme left and extreme right. That doesn't work very well. It doesn't represent a majority of Americans who are neither far left or right. The politicians of 60 years ago would probably be aghast at what their parties have become.
this is a good list so start. There are other reasons why trump is the better option.
There is not a single thing on that list that explains why Trump is a better option. It's just a list of mostly distorted, vague, or flat-out untrue events that, even if true, weren't within Harris' sphere of control.
sorry to have to spell it out for you, but as per usual, dems are dim wits who ostensibly appear intelligent but in reality are dull sheep.
1.) Raging inflation
Biden and Harris created inflation by printing money, giving everyone more cash and thus driving prices higher because people have more money to buy the same consumer goods.
The solution is the opposite of raging inflation: Trump's proposed policy on eliminating superfluous government employees will massively help reduce government spending. Trump aims to NOT print more money and reduce inflation, and make it easier for people to buy homes. Trump has proposed a policy to cut energy bills across the nation by adding new, domestic sources of energy, namely ANWR.
2.) Funding genocide in Gaza and West Bank.
Biden and Harris have not attended enough meetings in-person in the middle east with both sides of the conflict to come to a peaceful resolution. They simply have not put in the work. They both support war, which is a far cry from what democrats of the 1970s and 1980s used to believe in. If you support the current wars and want to continue funding them, you are morally evil.
The solution is to do the opposite of funding foreign wars. Yes Trump does claim to stand with Israel and Ukraine, but his policies will move towards a "deal" that will bring both conflicts to peace. Again, less spending on foreign wars will equate to less wasted money, less suffering and less death.
3.) Funding wars in Ukraine, Lebanon, Yemen, Syria, and likely Iran.
Biden and Harris want to continue to send our money for foreigners. This is disgusting. Not to mention, what happens when all the ukrainians die? That's a lot of blood spilled because of an ego trip.
The solution is to do the opposite of funding wars in ukraine, lebanon, yemen, syria and iran. Trump will STOP sending our money to foreigners, especially foreigners who play piano with their penis.
4.) Massive censorship
Biden and harris created committees to police free speech. They do not like it when people say the truth about things that you can see with your eyes. Like Lia Thomas winning the NCAA D1 swimming championship, despite being a dude.
The solution is to do the opposite: Trump aims to go after corrupt social media companies and ethically biased companies like Alphabet that skew information for normal search queries. For example, the free press is starting to expose just how graphic, bloody and gruesome it is to undergo genital mutilation as a minor. Transgender surgery operations on minors are banned in the UK and they should be banned in the US. Trump supports a ban on transgender surgeries for minors. Any normal person supports a ban on transgender surgeries on minors under the age of 18.
5.) Lockdowns. This is redundant, but biden and harris caused a lot of good people to lose their jobs because of faulty science and pharmaceutical company pressure. People aren't stupid. They will not forget what Biden did to kids, forcing 2 year olds to wear masks, while celebrities, and government officials like Alexandria Ocazio Ortez did not wear masks.
The solution is to do the opposite: Trump will not force someone to get the jab. Instead he will create options and give people the freedom to choose. He has not, to my knowledge stated what his policy is on punishing the pharmaceutical companies who produced the vaccine for causing vaccine injuries, but it appears that they may face severe consequences for their diabolical actions.
6.) Jab mandates. See #5.
7.) Russiagate. Biden and Harris and their little beta male minions LIED about Trump and Russia. It was proven that there was no russia collusion. And it wasted tax payer funds just to prove it.
The solution is to do the opposite: tell the truth about hunter biden feeding daddy Joe money for access to Foreigners. Trump aims to expose democrat deception with respect to foreign bribery. It's ironic that what the dems accused trump of doing, they did themselves. It's like a couple arguing over infidelity. Most times, the person accusing the other of cheating are cheating themselves. See Eric Adams as a perfect example.
8.) Lawfare against Trump. Biden and Harris and Soros and handful of bad actor attorneys have tried to imprison trump over charges that don't matter.
The solution is to do the opposite. Trump actions do not jail political opponents. yes there were chants of lock her up towards Hillary, but it never went anywhere. Trump would be in the right if he got elected and went after the nasty folks who tried to jail him, but he is focused on more unifying things such as reducing people's taxes, reducing interest rates, and stopping unnecessary foreign wars. Oh and deporting people who break the law.
9.) Criminalizing dissent. There's been a lot of information hidden about January 6th.
The solution is to do the opposite: take the high road and not persecute political rivals. We have inflation, illegal immigration, unfairly high taxes, and these things are Trump's top priorities. Not wasting tax payer money on going after your own countrymen.
10.) Assassination attempts. Wow. This is wrong. To try and murder the former president and nominee? Yes, biden did say that political violence should not be tolerated, but Harris was silent.
The solution is to do the opposite: don't attempt to assassinate your opponent. How many assassination attempts have there been towards the democratic nominee? zero. Trump doesn't look like the kind of person that would try to assassinate Harris. In fact, he WANTS to debate her on Fox News but she refused.
TLDR: Trumps policies of firing unnecessary government employees, reducing or eliminating frivolous governmental agencies, reducing inflation, increasing domestic energy production, will help reduce everyone's tax burden, thus giving people breathing room in their monthly and yearly budgets. By reducing inflation, interest rates will come down and make it more accessible for people to buy homes. And more houses will trade hands because people will not be afraid of high interest rates on the buying side. Trump aims to bring a fast solution to foreign conflicts which will not only help trade routes and international trade, but also help more people stay alive.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.