I’m amazed that Elizabeth Leachman, with gangly form, laid down a 5000m time that a decent collegiate runs.
Might be a little off topic but Im amazed at the power to weight ratio out there. You ever look at Sifan standing next to these other gals at the start? She has 2 tooth picks for legs that somehow generate amazing power and speed next these other girls with ripped quads.
I think I would start by restating the question. You should ask
"if you think running efficiency matters, who would say stands to benefit most?
Problem is that simple observations are very misleading. There have been countless runners who "look to be running ugly" when in fact they are running efficiently for their particular body construct.
i very specifically stated in my original post i was not talking about nor wanted to discuss "running efficiency", though i didn't say why admittedly
1. of course efficiency is going to be highest with whatever form the nervous system has been accustomed to; your average 90 year old walking hunched over is moving around at their peak efficiency as well because that's what their body has gotten used to, but that doesn't mean their form/posture is ideal right?
2. a prius may have greater efficiency than a porsche, but if the goal is to get from point A to point B as fast as possible you choose the porsche
The real head-scratcher for me is Quincy Wilson. With his eyes-in-the-skies, low floppy hands and bobbing form, he looks kind of like a caricature (maybe of Quincy Hall?). Yet he is already a high school GOAT.
If you were to be entrusted with him as a coach, do you work to change any of it? He is certainly young enough to adapt. Just look at Nico Young 2.0.
Quincy Wilson's form may work at 5'6", but about at 5'10"?
2025 will be a crucial year in the life of QW. Way more than 2024 was.
How say u?
Nijel Amos at 5'10", yeah QW's form will be just fine if he grows another 4"
Isaiah Harris is a great example of someone who just seems to muscle through their bad form. It's particularly impressive for the 800 because most guys around him are pretty smooth looking.
I think the one person I'd throw in for it being worth it to change/work on form is Natalie Cook. She's had wonky form and injury issues for a while and I can't imagine those two are unrelated. Nico Young has actually improved his form quite a bit this year and it's resulted in some great results so it would be cool for another phenom like Cook to follow him.
It is awkward, but he also is not done growing and maturing. 'Fixing' his form now adds the potential for disaster in the future.
Drew Bosely comes to mind simply because Mike Smith said his mechanics are essentially why he has been AWOL. If their form is detrimental to their running via injury, then a fix is needed.
At the professional level, I find a hard argument to 'fix' form. These aren't JV HSers- Cheserek looks like a duckfooted fool, but is undoubtedly the greatest NCAA athlete ever. Cheriyout's lean is otherwordly, but are you fixing that guy?
Which begs the question: did Ches' form put an early cap on his career performance, compared to someone like say Bernard Lagat? These are hypotheticals that are difficult to sort
Ches has a beautiful stride, other than that Paul Chelimo tic of wiping his nose
He ran a 3:49 mile at age 24, right in line with when we expect peak bone mass and corresponding peak speed of most international class runners, and he ran a 59:11! half marathon (American Record is 59:43) in September of 2023 so i'd say his "issue" is more likely to be some mixture of motivation/discipline/vision combined with the fact making global championship teams as a Kenyan citizen is exceptionally difficult
Could he improve his form? Maybe a little bit, sure, but he's definitely not one of the first that comes to mind and I really don't think it's high up on the list for him
If he had gotten American citizenship I'd guess his career arc would be wildly different
Which begs the question: did Ches' form put an early cap on his career performance, compared to someone like say Bernard Lagat? These are hypotheticals that are difficult to sort
Ches has a beautiful stride, other than that Paul Chelimo tic of wiping his nose
He ran a 3:49 mile at age 24, right in line with when we expect peak bone mass and corresponding peak speed of most international class runners, and he ran a 59:11! half marathon (American Record is 59:43) in September of 2023 so i'd say his "issue" is more likely to be some mixture of motivation/discipline/vision combined with the fact making global championship teams as a Kenyan citizen is exceptionally difficult
Could he improve his form? Maybe a little bit, sure, but he's definitely not one of the first that comes to mind and I really don't think it's high up on the list for him
If he had gotten American citizenship I'd guess his career arc would be wildly different
looked into the half times a little deeper
kinda crazy ryan hall's AR 59:43 barely cracks the top-500 performances of all time, the dividing line being those who have run 59:47 or faster
Ches' 59:11 is tied for 132nd best all-time, but there are prob at least 20 other Kenyans ahead of him
Kind of reminds me of the 800m guy from US. One of the "isaiahs" cant recall which one. Choppy stride looks like he is tying up all the time. Which is insane for 800, you would think perfect efficiency is needed. No accounting for what people get out of their bodies.
I mean has any Pro ever changed their form successfully? Or even Collegiate?
kipchoge was a heel striker in paris 2003 but now his running form is so smooth. It's not a huge change tho...
Cole Hocker. He gave loudmouthed Kerr a savage - and deserved - beating in Paris but imagine how much worse that whipping would have been if he tilt backward and have such awful arm carriage.
The amount of gold medalists that people swear have bad form is something I’ve long found amusing
There's a video of Michael Johnson criticizing Bolt's form
we've all been left in the dust by that guy who looks like he is working so hard but never slows down. they just have a higher vo2 max and their blood can get the oxygen to their muscles quicker. in 5ks and 10ks running economy is less important - vo2 max much more important. when you get to the marathon and up running economy is much more important and vo2 max less so.
i realize a lot, maybe even the majority of runners think you sort of just fall into your best form over time since efficiency (metabolic supply/demand) is best when not thinking about it
i'm not here to debate you if it is or is not relevant, only asking you if it is in fact significant what runner has the most upside based on their sub-par form?
I recently listened to an interview with Iain Hunter, a exercise science professor at BYU who does a lot of form analysis for the different track events. He told a story, which I have not verified elsewhere, about how Bill Rodgers had a weird lateral movement in his arm swing and worked with a few people to try and make it more "efficient". They later found out that one of his legs was significantly shorter than the other, so the arm swing was likely a natural compensation that he actually needed.
On the other hand, bad form can be a sign of a muscular weakness or even an adaptation to an old injury that was never properly addressed. In that case, training running form is also not the best solution because it doesn't solve the problems mentioned above.
For ages I thought it was a kind of "knee varus" thing going on, but it's actually his feet sharply turning in at the last moment before he strikes the ground. There's a lot of leverage available to him (through his feet) that he just isn't using.
His body has obviously found a way to make it work though, and work very well it does. Can't argue with his results.
There is natural running form and effective running form. A few are blessed with their natural running form being their effective running form. You have to find your effective running form. When you are clicking along, irregardless of fitness, you know you have found your effective running form.
You KNOW when it is working; you know when it is not.
On the other hand, bad form can be a sign of a muscular weakness or even an adaptation to an old injury that was never properly addressed. In that case, training running form is also not the best solution because it doesn't solve the problems mentioned above.
I think this is a good point because it's not something you can tell from just watching someone. I always thought German Fernandez had some of the best, most fluid running mechanics I've ever seen but his forefoot strike probably didn't help the Achilles issues he had throughout his career.
Also I think you address another good point which is the idea of "training running form" as a solution. So someone has "improper" mechanics that cause issues in races and don't let them train full without issue? Now what? Do a bunch of A and B skips until they become robotic? Usually the answer to addressing a "running form" issue is to just get stronger in particular area but this goal has nothing to do with trying to get someone to run like David Rudisha, it's just about general strengthening. That's my longwinded way of saying that training to have "good form" isn't really something you take time out of a training schedule for. You do drills and workouts to practice running fast and make that feel more comfortable but you don't do that with the idea of "I need to hit this split with a specifc stride angle, forefoot strike, and cadence."
The amount of gold medalists that people swear have bad form is something I’ve long found amusing
There's a video of Michael Johnson criticizing Bolt's form
which one are you referring to?
i found one about 6 minutes long on YT where him and his team are analysing Bolt's form and while they say "it's scary" how much faster he could be if they did what they thought he ought to, but they only pointed out one thing specifically, which naturally they were way off base on unsurprisingly (talking about his legs not aiming/driving forwards during first few steps, which is a misunderstanding on their part)
On the other hand, bad form can be a sign of a muscular weakness or even an adaptation to an old injury that was never properly addressed. In that case, training running form is also not the best solution because it doesn't solve the problems mentioned above.
I think this is a good point because it's not something you can tell from just watching someone. I always thought German Fernandez had some of the best, most fluid running mechanics I've ever seen but his forefoot strike probably didn't help the Achilles issues he had throughout his career.
have to remember one can have "ideal form" and still get injured of course
german probably would have been well served to use the seated calf machine 2x a week. the soleus routinely sees the highest peak muscular forces during the vast majority of running paces that distance runners train and race at. generally we only see well-trained sprinters achieving higher peak forces in other areas when at very high speed. anyway, the tissue where the soleus and achilles become one (it's sort of a continuum/spectrum turning from muscle into tendon) is under tremendous load so no surprise calf/soleus strains and achilles issues are so common
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.