Experience out of blocks is huge, Mondo would have some experience but nothing compared to Warholm. In saying that, I think both will be a bit slower than expected. I'll go with Warholm 10.4x, Mondo 10.7x
not saying you're wrong, but how do you know the 10.57 was heavily wind-aided when there is no record of a wind reading with that result?
his 10.74 shows it was wind-aided with a 3.9 reading, so you could certainly be right about that 10.57 i'm just curious how you know that.
the day he ran 10.74 (Louisiana state meet may 1, 2018, 8th place) he also vaulted 5.95 which was a PR for him
i'll be super impressed if he can break Flojo's best 100m time
Cause everyone else in the race PRd by like 0.4seconds. Then a week later mondo ran 10.74 with +3.8 wind. I'm thinking momdo was a 10.8-10.9 guy in HS.
I was at the state meet that year. Mondo was clearly gassed from his PR in the PV, which was over before he ran the 100. I'm assuming he also had to vault before running 10.57 at regionals, but he only vaulted 15 feet at that meet. Yes, I know there was a tailwind, but I think he would have been at least a wind-legal 10.5 guy on fresh legs in HS. And he should be faster now. I still think Warholm beats him, probably 10.3 low for Warholm and 10.4 low for Mondo.
1
1
We have enough Youth, What we need is a Fountain of Smart.
I think it's definitely Advantage Warholm. He has been working on blocks and acceleration from his work on the 400H. And while Duplantis has a very solid HS time, if he hasn't been working on top-end speed, I just don't see him putting it all together in this one-off race. So my guess, which is all it really is, is that Warholm will run 10.28 and Duplantis will run 10.46 and might even pull a hamstring.
If no drug testing, Warholm 10.2. Some people just don’t understand track and field around here; you are hobby joggers and simpletons. This man runs a 20.4 200 and he can hit 10.2 with a good start.