Ok, but as I have said many times in this thread. I'm not here to debate transgenderism. I don't care what your opinions on transgenderism are, I'm not interested.
I am here for one reason only: to understand why people believe that adults booing a kid is appropriate. So far, only one person has actually answered my question by invoking a moral hazard and implying that the good consequences will outweigh the bad.
The only act that would evince empathy from me in this situation for the boy is if he gave the first place medal to the girl he beat and gave an apology.
I also feel that the girls in this event should boycott the ceremony to embarrass the spineless adults who let them down. No need to boo, just expose the fraud for what it is.
Im pretty sure she would hate it. If DSD athletes,and trans athletes came out,and dominated, nikki would not be so supportive.
NIkki has stated publicly that they support Caster Semenya and they have no issue with DSD athletes competing. You are going to have to find a different made-up, bullsh!t idea to spread hate.
1) <sarc>Yeah, everybody who doesn't believe the transgender fantasy MUST BE A HATING HATEFUL HATER!</sarc>
2) If the idea that Nikki Hiltz would be upset by men competing in her race is a "made-up, bullsh!t idea," then what words describe the idea of transgenderism? Surely something more severe than "made-up, bullish!t."
Nothing would be more awesome than a transgender woman running in the women's 1500 at trials next week and nipping Nikki for that third Olympic spot.
Please think long and hard about exactly why you feel so strongly about this and why you would wish this upon someone you don’t know and whose life has absolutely no bearing on your own.
Hiltz pushes to allow male transgenders in women's sport as long as it doesn't affect her directly. But she'd almost certainly not be happy if (pretending World Athetlics rules didn't change) 3:40 male grew his hair out, declared himself female, and jogged a 3:55 dominating the field over the last lap and causing her to not make the team. It's yet another example of leftist hypocrisy.
Im pretty sure she would hate it. If DSD athletes,and trans athletes came out,and dominated, nikki would not be so supportive.
NIkki has stated publicly that they support Caster Semenya and they have no issue with DSD athletes competing. You are going to have to find a different made-up, bullsh!t idea to spread hate.
Please stop with the hate schtick - it's so overdone. Disbelievers in transgenderism aren't encouraging poisoning these terribly confused people with onslaughts of opposite sex hormones and barrages of same-sex hormone suppressors and cutting off healthy body parts. Your side does that. So just who are the haters?
The people who enable men with transexualism deserve far worse than boos.
The people suffering the disease deserve respect after they're cured, but until then no amount of force that would keep them away from real girls is too much.
It is not a disease. The main reason many Democrats refuse to support our stance is because people like you alienate them with blatant Transphobia and bigotry. Though I agree that this has undone decades of work to get women's sports as a separate division. Something I will note was supported by the left and viciously opposed by the right the whole time it was being fought for.
It is not a disease. The main reason many Democrats refuse to support our stance is because people like you alienate them with blatant Transphobia and bigotry. Though I agree that this has undone decades of work to get women's sports as a separate division. Something I will note was supported by the left and viciously opposed by the right the whole time it was being fought for.
a bipartisan view on LetsRun? your kind aren’t welcome here.
It is not a disease. The main reason many Democrats refuse to support our stance is because people like you alienate them with blatant Transphobia and bigotry. Though I agree that this has undone decades of work to get women's sports as a separate division. Something I will note was supported by the left and viciously opposed by the right the whole time it was being fought for.
What part of opposing the poisoning of terribly confused people with onslaughts of opposite sex hormones and barrages of same-sex hormone suppressors and cutting off their healthy body parts constitutes "Transphobia and bigotry?"
The people who enable men with transexualism deserve far worse than boos.
The people suffering the disease deserve respect after they're cured, but until then no amount of force that would keep them away from real girls is too much.
It is not a disease. The main reason many Democrats refuse to support our stance is because people like you alienate them with blatant Transphobia and bigotry. Though I agree that this has undone decades of work to get women's sports as a separate division. Something I will note was supported by the left and viciously opposed by the right the whole time it was being fought for.
"our" "transphobia" "bigotry"
1) There is no "our" or "we". There is a "you" and your kind, who have completely enabled this behavior. Your responsibility to own.
1) Absolutely nobody is afraid of men dressing up as girls. Repulsed maybe, but not in any way afraid.
2) Telling the truth is never "bigoted" (put this up there with "fascism" as words brought to prominence through Leftist repetition and social engineering). You can't on one hand say "reality is determined by subjective thoughts (i.e. transsexualism is real)" and on the other hand get mad when transgender men actually follow through on that premise and compete against real women, or serve time in real women's prisons, or get changed in real women's locker rooms. It's an either or issue-- either mentally ill people's thoughts on their sex determine their sex, or objective reality exists.
There are no such thing as "transgender people" any more then there are "cancer people" or "PTSD people". Transsexualism is a disease to be eradicated and it is completely harmful (and hateful) to not try and cure those suffering from their delusions,
Ok, but as I have said many times in this thread. I'm not here to debate transgenderism. I don't care what your opinions on transgenderism are, I'm not interested.
I am here for one reason only: to understand why people believe that adults booing a kid is appropriate. So far, only one person has actually answered my question by invoking a moral hazard and implying that the good consequences will outweigh the bad.
i see it more as 'booing' a policy they deem to be unfair... and if some teenage boy that is taking advantage of some stupid loophole rule made by unathletic people that absolutely didn't excel in sports or anything else in high school than so be it.
If transgenderism is not a disease, why is it treated with drugs and surgery? Why do transgendered people seek treatment from medical professionals if it is not a disease?
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.