20 lbs will crush actual elite runners pace per mile, so I am thinking some sport where cardio is huge but strength is equally important. Probably ice hockey, crossfit (yes, don't laugh), or boxing. Or Military.
Hilly rooty rocky trails with 100 ft/mile elevation accrual. 20 pound bag of rice must be carried during the race.
rowers or nordic skiers and i don't think its close
rowers are too heavy for that duration vs an actual runner or...
...i think soccer players would be the best bet, if not the nordic skiers good bet
This post was edited 38 seconds after it was posted.
Reason provided:
added skiers
The answer would be distance running, if the runner is strong enough. If the weight was considered heavy to an average man (that would have to be a bit heavier than a measly 20 pounds though, I'd go with the top Spartan racers in the world to be the best.
20 lbs will crush actual elite runners pace per mile, so I am thinking some sport where cardio is huge but strength is equally important. Probably ice hockey, crossfit (yes, don't laugh), or boxing. Or Military.
Hilly rooty rocky trails with 100 ft/mile elevation accrual. 20 pound bag of rice must be carried during the race.
Probably CrossFit - is that a sport? They do stuff like this over short distances. Only problem would be that they’d call it ten miles then measure the course is some weird measurement that cuts about 2 miles off the actual distance then brag about how fast the winner is.
I think 40lbs is where the "muscle" part would become to play a bigger role. But I agree with some others that we would probably need to get to 50lbs before a non runner athlete would start get a real advantage.
Perhaps a rangy middle weight wrestler, sorta like Matthew Modine in Vision Quest? Or even a male ballet dancer who's into running? However, I can definitely see some Special Forces/Navy Seal/Delta types.
Hilly rooty rocky trails with 100 ft/mile elevation accrual. 20 pound bag of rice must be carried during the race.
This thread has too much empahsis on the 20# bag of rice and not enough on the hilly, rooty trails and elevation change.
As a triathlete/duathlete that competes at a high level, I would love to just declare my guys as the obvious winners. We would field some studs, because top triathletes are bigger than you would think, and the cycling results in some very strong, sturdy legs that would be suited to adding a fair amount of weight. Most importantly, when you do a lot of running after cycling you develop a stride that is efficient in a way that I would help here; low to the ground and quick turnover.
HOWEVER, we almost all spend our time running on flat to only moderately hilly roads and tracks. We don't do a lot (or any) running around tree roots and rocks, or up and down jarring elevation changes.
20 lbs will crush actual elite runners pace per mile, so I am thinking some sport where cardio is huge but strength is equally important. Probably ice hockey, crossfit (yes, don't laugh), or boxing. Or Military.
Hilly rooty rocky trails with 100 ft/mile elevation accrual. 20 pound bag of rice must be carried during the race.
We all know that Chris Solinsky wins this competition. So..distance running.
20 lbs will crush actual elite runners pace per mile, so I am thinking some sport where cardio is huge but strength is equally important. Probably ice hockey, crossfit (yes, don't laugh), or boxing. Or Military.
Hilly rooty rocky trails with 100 ft/mile elevation accrual. 20 pound bag of rice must be carried during the race.
We all know that Chris Solinsky wins this competition. So..distance running.
Definitely nordic skiers. Same aerobic fitness as distance runners, but a lot of focus on upper body, core strength and balance (which is the key to carrying a heavy load over rough terrain). Plus, nordic skiers do trail running all summer and fall to train.
Its runners and its not even close. When I was in the army, I went on special forces selection which in the endurance phase in my country is precisely what the OP is putting up as the challenge. The rucks were between 10 and 40 miles over mountain trails. The bergin had to weigh 55lbs not including water or food and your rifle too. The record on the most prominent ruck was held by an ex-international runner.
This is The Answer, I did Cross Country Wrestling and Track for Cal State Bakersfield in the 1980's I ran local 10k's in 32 and Half Marathons in 70 Minutes during Wrestling Season, Just Running 7- 9 Miles in the Morning then Wrestling in the Afternoon and a longer run of 12-15 on days we did not have Wrestling Practice. As part of Wamups for practice we had races with another wrestler on the back, which became very easy, even when the person on your back was 30-40 pounds heavier than you. Wrestling is great overall conditioning
Mid-d. Do you really think a boxer is going to beat someone like Isaiah Harris in a 10 mile race just because he’s carrying some extra weight? Hell, I’d take Isaiah Harris carrying 20 lbs over a boxer carrying no extra weight over 10 miles.
hilarious you bring up boxing as an example of people who can't run (??) when running has always been a pretty integral part of boxing training (for cardio duh). an undefeated pro boxer ran a 14:26 5k not too long ago which would have LEFT YOUR COWARD ASS IN THE DUST. enjoy the next message board you find.
trail/mounrain runners would absolutely destroy crossfit bros, hockey players, rugby players, and 800 meter runners, and pretty much anyone else, ifit's really 20 pounds over 10 miles of very technical terrain.
trail running is its own sport. have you watched the way pikes peak winners run downhill? or mt. marathon winners? killian jornet summited everest (carrying skiis and a pack) TWICE in a week. these people would absolutely destroy "normal" runners of any distance in this sort of event, and the best athletes from any other sport would lost by 20 to 30 minutes at a minimum.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.