It is going to have to be more than a tweet and some guy’s sub stack before this is legitimate. Just because you write something on the internet doesn’t make it true.
Read the content of the tweet proving President Diversity (oh she with her H of 8) cheated.
Truth exists independent of who writes it or the form in which it is conveyed. Either the material in the tweet is the diversity hire's thesis, or it isn't.
This thread feels like the "Official Russia vs Ukraine war" thread a couple months back. The "Ukraine is winning" commenters were getting frantic, demanding censorship, and losing their minds because it was becoming obvious, even to them, that Russia was winning.
Fast forward to today, and the "Ukraine is winning" commenters have vanished since is obvious to all that Ukraine has lost and all that remains is how much Ukrainian territory Russia will annex.
Bet your house that Gay's thesis was indeed plagiarized and her "defense" will be very weak and probably include the word "racist." Open question: Will blatant plagiarism like this cause her resignation? Eh, maybe so, maybe no. Academic standards < equity.
A black woman who is president of the most prestigious university in America is all of a sudden accused of plagiarism.
The same thing happened to another black woman in Boston, Phillis Wheatley in 1772. A bunch of old wyt men claimed there was no way a young black slave woman could write a book of poetry, so we must investigate and have a hearing and badger this woman.
Centuries later, same ole racist s*** by racist wyt men.
A CRITIC AT LARGE about American poet & slave Phillis Wheatley... She had arrived in Boston on July 11, 1761, on board the Phillis, a slaver that was …
Open question: Will blatant plagiarism like this cause her resignation? Eh, maybe so, maybe no. Academic standards < equity.
You have yet to provide one shred of evidence of plagerism. All you have done is link to unverified claims on Twitter. Show us the goods and explain what, specifically, was plagerized or STFU.
You didn't attend Harvard or you would be able to read his statement. Of course there are smart blcak women, but he said that a smarter white male would not be seriously considered for the position. You do know that Harvard was discriminating for blacks in admissions?
Look at Nobel Prize winners in non-fluff (e.g. literature and peace) prizes. Most are white or Asian males. Asian or white males are systemically discriminated against so much that they have to be exceptional to get the same looks as a far less qualified black woman.
It is not plagiarism. It is at best editorial nit picking over whether quotation marks were necessary (very subjective in the context of directly speaking about another author's work) and a section where a reference to her dissertation advisor's work was further down in an appendix instead of being more prominent. Pretty much by definition there is no plagiarism when your dissertation advisors approves of how you have referenced his work.
All these clowns do is take plagiarism software and run it through someone's dissertation they do not like. There is absolutely nothing in here that is anywhere close to meeting the intent required for plagiarism.
EXCLUSIVE: @RealChrisBrunet and I have obtained documentation demonstrating that Harvard President Claudine Gay plagiarized multiple sections of her Ph.D. thesis, violating Harvard's policies on academic integrity.
Look at Nobel Prize winners in non-fluff (e.g. literature and peace) prizes. Most are white or Asian males. Asian or white males are systemically discriminated against so much that they have to be exceptional to get the same looks as a far less qualified black woman.
Hey, you plagiarized part of your comment from me! LOL.
You didn't attend Harvard or you would be able to read his statement. Of course there are smart blcak women, but he said that a smarter white male would not be seriously considered for the position. You do know that Harvard was discriminating for blacks in admissions?
Discriminating for Blacks? WTH?
Obviously you are not black, nor do you know the history of this country. So...tell me what happened to all these unqualified blacks who were admitted to the most prestigious university in America? If they were unqualified, surely according to racists, they would fail and flunk out. That has not been the case at all. They are million times more intelligent than you.
There are millions of black people alive that were denied admission to hundreds of universities in America because they banned blacks from attending. Now that the president of Harvard is a black woman, now racist claim she was qualified after the fact and after Rep Stefanik tried to call her out.
You didn't attend Harvard or you would be able to read his statement. Of course there are smart blcak women, but he said that a smarter white male would not be seriously considered for the position. You do know that Harvard was discriminating for blacks in admissions?
Discriminating for Blacks? WTH?
Obviously you are not black, nor do you know the history of this country. So...tell me what happened to all these unqualified blacks who were admitted to the most prestigious university in America? If they were unqualified, surely according to racists, they would fail and flunk out. That has not been the case at all. They are million times more intelligent than you.
There are millions of black people alive that were denied admission to hundreds of universities in America because they banned blacks from attending. Now that the president of Harvard is a black woman, now racist claim she was qualified after the fact and after Rep Stefanik tried to call her out.
Haven’t wokes complained about there being too many Africans at top colleges? Why doesn’t racism hold them back?