One hit wonder Molly Seidel lacks class

1000% more hits than you’ll ever have and she still got your attention, probably lives in your head rent free 24/7/365.

When you're side is sending around activists to target the one Cristian conservative web designer or the one Christian conservative cake maker in the state to file lawsuits against them you know you're definitely on the right side of history.

Fun fact, in the cake make case the cake maker who was sued didn't even deny service to gay couple. He was willing to make them a cake just not the specific cake they wanted. Good times in Colorado. I think this whole pride hysteria has about six months left to finish running its course before the woke brigade completely finished off the job of passing off the majority of Americans.

Everyone is entitled to their freedom of speech. Molly is entitled to hers just as the cake designer and web designer are entitled to theirs. Fortunately, their free speech only affects their business. So any harm from their behavior will be felt by them alone. In general, as a business owner, it is a bad idea to take a strong stand on a divisive political issue one way or the other, as you are likely to alienate half of your customer base in doing so (or more in the case of Bud Light). This really won’t impact the lives of members of the LGBTQIA+ community in the least because most creative businesses seek to appeal to anyone with money or cater to niche markets.

The truth is that those on the left encourage people to make discriminatory purchasing decisions each and every day. There is no prohibition by the court on advertising if a business is black owned, woman owned or gay owned. In fact, in government contracting, this form of discrimination is often rewarded.

Giving the double bird is way over the top. It’s one thing to have a long social media rant, but to include that picture is distasteful and shows her immaturity. She will not be relevant in the pro running scene moving forward.

She doesn't understand the law at all. What trash academic school did she go to?

Exactly it was about the type of service being created. They were denying creating a certain type of product, not denying the person

Yeah, like chanting "Lock her up," or "Let's go Brandon" (or what they REALLY were chanting on live television).

Or claiming that you definitely didn't rape someone because "she's not my type."

Or constantly suggesting that someone has dementia.

How come when I created this thread with Molly's middle fingers photo last night it got deleted but this exact same thread is now featured as hot?

Molly is just going more and more woke to try to stay in the spotlight since she has not been able to run competitive times for a long time and likely never will.

I know it's beyond obvious but most of the posters on here are middle-aged runners who never had the career Molly is enjoying. And so you are envious and want to troll her. Yep, I'm also middle-aged but I am not an idiot. I admit to the slight bias that I was captain of ND track and cross country - years ago - but I still know people who know what a wonderful person Molly is. She is entitled to her opinion and these days with social media, it is EXPECTED that you express yourself. Hell, this is mild compared to what someone like Trump says every day on his failed Twitter site. And yes... this ruling - completely based on a hypothetical, there was no "standing" - opens the doors to any business denying service to someone who is gay.. and believe me, next year it will be denying service to interracial couples, or Muslims because they are infidels... and then some religion will say I think red-haired people are the devil so I don't want to serve them. This is NOT a 1st Amendment case, but the extreme Supreme Court used the 1st amendment to allow discrimination. For the last several years this Court, and politicians on the right, have mainly been concerned with taking away rights we have had for 50 years because equal rights for everyone scares their political base. This ruling was another example, and Molly has a 1st amendment right to complain. I mean, so many of these posts sound like they are coming from aggrieved 5-year-olds. Grow up.

She also grew up rich and full of privilege -- this is her "reparations."

How coddled are you? Middle finger is raw hatred??? You must be the softest person on the planet. People are out here dealing with real issues like violence and poverty and this guy is crying himself to sleep over a middle finger, what a joke.

Everyone does not agree with that. In fact, in a moral society, nobody agrees with that.

Person A should NEVER feel entitled to the efforts of Person B, and Person B should feel free to provide their labor to whomever they want or don't want, for whatever reason they want or don't want (so long as everyone involved has the ability to consent, i.e. is an adult).

Forced labor is immoral. Thinking otherwise is just supporting slavery.

Yes, if you go to the first page and click on the link, you'll be brought to an instagram post where Huddle argues that a person should be forced against their will to provide their labor to someone else (that is, slavery)

She sure has the right to speak her mind. But she’s coming off like a brat doing so. There’s a classy way of doing things, there’s the not so classy way

She is NOT one of the most talented American marathoners ever, BS.

The poster is right, the stars did indeed align for her while others simply had bad days at the trials. I don't care what she says on Instagram or any other source as I'm smart enough to know she's an opportunist who is cashing in. Flip the bird then sit on your computer and watch the view count. She's a very good runner and things went well for her, but she's not good enough to sniff Sisson's shoelaces.

But objectively one of the best? The medal kinda counts?

This thread is baffling.

Young ladies shouldn’t curse and use nasty hand gestures. She is not a good representative for Notre Dame.

You don’t even know what runner we are talking about. Typical.

I'm trying to understand the position that says website designers can discriminate against LGBTQ customers but Harvard and UNC can't discriminate against Asians.

I'm also trying to understand the position that says website designers can't discriminate against LGBTQ customers but Harvard and UNC can discriminate against Asians.

Please help me out.