ACC Indoors Discussion 2023

semihaze wrote:

#accgonnabewild wrote:

No. It’s a hydraulic banked official track. Anyone else think it might be a slow track?

its a banked track??? doesnt look like it

#accgonnabewild wrote:

I mean the winning time was 36th in the nation. Something has to be wrong.

FastTuohy wrote:

#accgonnabewild wrote:

I mean the winning time was 36th in the nation. Something has to be wrong.

Chmiel and Seymour hung back till less than 2K to go and then just separated

#accgonnabewild wrote:

I mean the winning time was 36th in the nation. Something has to be wrong.

Blank231 wrote:

#accgonnabewild wrote:

I mean the winning time was 36th in the nation. Something has to be wrong.

It was slower than I expected. Credit to Vestri for getting out there and trying to push the pace.

#accgonnabewild wrote:

Or maybe NC State just getting slower.

FastTuohy wrote:

#accgonnabewild wrote:

Or maybe NC State just getting slower.

Chmiel does not have the great accelleration she runs fastest off a fast pace.

Blank231 wrote:

FastTuohy wrote:

Chmiel does not have the great accelleration she runs fastest off a fast pace.

She already has a solid qualifier, looked like she was just going for the win. But yeah all the times were slower. Vestri 16:05, she ran 15:42 at BU.

Blank231 wrote:

FastTuohy wrote:

Chmiel does not have the great accelleration she runs fastest off a fast pace.

She already has a solid qualifier, looked like she was just going for the win. But yeah all the times were slower. Vestri 16:05, she ran 15:42 at BU.

FastMcCabe wrote:

Blank231 wrote:

She already has a solid qualifier, looked like she was just going for the win. But yeah all the times were slower. Vestri 16:05, she ran 15:42 at BU.

I'm sure Chmiel could’ve run 15:25 or 17 flat, whatever it took to win. I hope Tuohy doesn’t do the same and instead makes it quick (but not too quick!) on Sat, pulling the lead pack to fast times. If so, we should have a better idea of how fast this track really is.

FastTuohy wrote:

M 5000 are going to have to fly to beat heat 1 winner

Blank231 wrote:

FastMcCabe wrote:

I'm sure Chmiel could’ve run 15:25 or 17 flat, whatever it took to win. I hope Tuohy doesn’t do the same and instead makes it quick (but not too quick!) on Sat, pulling the lead pack to fast times. If so, we should have a better idea of how fast this track really is.

Several teams need a fast DMR so we shall see momentarily!