As far as track records go, I'm surprised nobody's mentioned the 3000. Definitely more guys who can run 4:12 or 14:06 than can run 8:06
It's the 1:02:53 half, and it isn't that close. That time for the half would be the 104 fastest American man of all time, while more than 200 NCAA runners broke 8:06 last year indoors. Gidey's time would have been a men's WR up until 1977.
It's the 1:02:53 half, and it isn't that close. That time for the half would be the 104 fastest American man of all time, while more than 200 NCAA runners broke 8:06 last year indoors. Gidey's time would have been a men's WR up until 1977.
Nah, these stats are skewed by the advent of super shoes. Not to mention the fact that the half marathon has much less prestige than the full ‘thon.
It's the 1:02:53 half, and it isn't that close. That time for the half would be the 104 fastest American man of all time, while more than 200 NCAA runners broke 8:06 last year indoors. Gidey's time would have been a men's WR up until 1977.
Nah, these stats are skewed by the advent of super shoes. Not to mention the fact that the half marathon has much less prestige than the full ‘thon.
Versus JJK, Wang, and Koch who were clearly competing without any unfair advantages...
You are going to have to provide at least some evidence to back this up. I have a really hard time believing 5-8 HS kids a year have the aerobic base to string together 21 straight 2:58 KMs. Do you really think half a dozen kids each year can run 47:00 10 millers or 28:30 10Ks?
Does anyone know how many Japanese* HS boys run the Half each year? I think that if they can do it, it isn't the "hardest of all events" for a male. It doesn't say "American men" anywhere, does it? And it certainly doesn't say "HS boys" in the OP, so why are we worrying about that. It just says, "for a guy."
* These guys aren't even pros, they are just college age runners:
The question is basically what are the strongest women's world records
Not necessarily, Kratochvílová's 800 WR is usually considered to be one of the strongest in the sport but many very good HS boys could easily go under that. Meanwhile no HS kid is capable of sniffing Gidey's half marathon WR.
It's not about high school boys, it's about men in general. High school boys don't have the mileage built up for a half marathon and there's no reason for them to ever race one in high school. But I've seen men that never came close to breaking 15 in college end up running 1:01 in the half, and that's decades before super shoes.
Heather Anderson's 2015 SoBo record was an overall record at the time but Joey Campanelli went more than 5 days faster a couple years later. Unless something happened recently that I didn't hear about.
In general, records for these huge distance endurance events suffer from the low number of people who actually do them.
Anderson also had the unsupported FKT for the Pacific Crest Trail that she set in 2013, which record stood until last summer, when a Josh Perry set the new record. But I do actually agree with BW that Amish’s performances in these super-long endurance events suggest that women can compete head to head with men. Of course, as you say, sample sizes are pretty small.
You might want to edit the wikipedia then which still lists her with the Appalachian record, on the page about the trail.
"But I've seen men that never came close to breaking 15 in college end up running 1:01 in the half, and that's decades before super shoes."
Ridiculous. So you claim these runners went on to run 30 seconds faster than their college 5K PB more than 8 times over? Were they doing 30 mpw in college or what?
The question should be, "what's the hardest women's WR for a high school boy to beat?"
Every women's track and field/road running world record has been bettered by a high school-aged (14-18) boy.
Few high schools have a good enough vaults coach (if one at all) to get them over 5 meters. Even elite decathletes don't beat that by much. So maybe that's the hardest one.
Ironic, since it needs so much upper body strength.
Going on the premise that you mean male athletes who do the same event, and not just "guys" at large.
I don't have any hard data to support this, and it's mostly just a gut feeling backed by some hands on experience, but I'm saying the women's discus record.
If a good male discus thrower went at the way lighter, way smaller women's disc the same way they did the men's weight disc, they'd overpower it and the physics of it's flight would be a mess. They'd have to adjust a lot of things to adapt to the lighter weight & size and make it fly right, whereas a top male sprinter or miler or jumper would just have to do their normal, and not even as well as they normally do.
If you did mean "guys at large", nevermind I guess.
I think male discus throwers could quickly adjust to the smaller disc; do you have evidence to the contrary?
It has to be the marathon. If you were an American man running 2:14 in 2022, you would be a top-25 guy in the nation. I don't think any other equivalent result would net you such a high placing.
Or we could think of the question this way, if you were the coach of an average DI college track team, do you think you would beat all of the women's track records over 20 years of coaching? Yes, of course. But which ones would your athletes rarely beat?
I went to a small DIII school and we had guys who were faster in about half the events. I know alumni who went on to break all these times except the 400H.
That said, I think it would be hardest to find dudes who can run 50.68 in the 400H. That sounds so insane. Sydney is amazing.
I would love to know who that runner was. That seems impossible. A male runner who can't run sub-15 could never run 1:01 in the half.
There have only been about 30 US born men who have run under 1:02 and most of them were faster than 15:30 before they even got to college. Plus, there are only about 5 who you could classify as decades before super shoes. Prior to 1980, that time would have been a world record.
I'm quoting the OP because I wanted to see if it specified track and field or road racing. It does not, nor does the thread title.
So, I would say that a women's world record for running a trail race of 100 miles is something that not so many men could do, and even less would want to try.
Other than that, I thought the argument for the Heptathlon was pretty sound.
Finally, wouldn't the toughest track record be the one (whatever it is) that is beaten by the fewest men, worldwide, on a yearly basis? Perhaps that would be hard to track because most women's records are beaten by a lot of guys (no offense, just true) every year. For example, the 800 world record is routinely beaten at many high school regionals and most state meets, and that's just U.S. high schoolers.
Something like the half marathon, that is run by fewer men and requires years of development would also be a solid bet.
There's no such thing as a women's world record for running a trail race of 100 miles, so that's out.
There are course records, sure - but ultra trail running is such a niche sport, with such small participation in even the most well known races (e.g. Western States is capped at 400 runners) that any course record would lack the depth and legacy to drive those times down to the standards of track and road races.
I don't know of many elite male discus throwers that post their 1k efforts. But I do know John Powell, who threw the 2k over 70m, threw the 1k over 90m.
I was wondering what womens wr would be hardest for a guy to beat.
probably gideys half marathon
or maybe Sydney’s 400 hurdles
For the average poster, I would say FloJo's 10.49, 21.34 and Koch's 47.60 are pretty beyond difficult. An underrated mention might be Yulimar Rojas' triple jump. People truly do not understand how absurd a 51 foot triple jump is. One of the greatest athletes I have ever known is a 16m+ triple jumper. He is 6' 2 and absolutely shredded, D1 athlete with multiple school records. Rojas could easily be his training partner and potentially snag a win against him on a given day.