Well well well, wasn't LRC defending this clown a couple months ago? Telling us not to jump to conclusions & that the ban wasn't enough evidence for them? 0% shocked by any of this.
Well well well, wasn't LRC defending this clown a couple months ago? Telling us not to jump to conclusions & that the ban wasn't enough evidence for them? 0% shocked by any of this.
NERunner03533 wrote:
Well well well, wasn't LRC defending this clown a couple months ago? Telling us not to jump to conclusions & that the ban wasn't enough evidence for them? 0% shocked by any of this.
+1
Waiting for all the PR shills and trolls to start spinning this too.
What gender did the victim identify as?
casual obsever wrote:
NERunner03533 wrote:
Well well well, wasn't LRC defending this clown a couple months ago? Telling us not to jump to conclusions & that the ban wasn't enough evidence for them? 0% shocked by any of this.
+1
Waiting for all the PR shills and trolls to start spinning this too.
They are all allegations. Innocent until proven guilty.
NERunner03533 wrote:
Well well well, wasn't LRC defending this clown a couple months ago? Telling us not to jump to conclusions & that the ban wasn't enough evidence for them? 0% shocked by any of this.
The validity of the claim I have no idea on but if true why wasn't this info apparently passed to legal authorities for investigation?
Again, not that it is untrue but the entirety of the story doesn't add up.
Was the athlete ‘Ritz’?
izzystradlin wrote:
The Ghost of Randy Savage wrote:
Word to the wise...have a freakin' third party LMT work on your athletes!
His massage thing always seemed real weird
This. Access to the best massage therapists money can buy and you’re giving private, one on one massages to athletes. WTF.
birdbeard wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
NY Times.
Not trustworthy at all.
lol if NYT and NPR aren't trustworthy no journalism outfits are. those are about the only two good ones with reporting standards left.
Lol....NYT trustworthy? For 2 years they promoted the fake Trump/Russia narrative that was debunked by Mueller...
coachy wrote:
My money is on Mary Cain
My money is on Galen Rupp.
At the end of the article they tell us who the runner is and of course it is a woman.
serena wrote:
At the end of the article they tell us who the runner is and of course it is a woman.
They do? Can someone copy and paste? It’s behind a paywall
ruppgalen wrote:
casual obsever wrote:
+1
Waiting for all the PR shills and trolls to start spinning this too.
They are all allegations. Innocent until proven guilty.
Welp, dude is banned so to any rational observer that means the burden of proof as to his guilt has been met.
ruppgalen wrote:
They are all allegations. Innocent until proven guilty.
Ummmm, remember: lifetime ban for sexual misconduct, confirmed after appeal.
shelbo900 wrote:
serena wrote:
At the end of the article they tell us who the runner is and of course it is a woman.
They do? Can someone copy and paste? It’s behind a paywall
They reveal it without naming her. It is obvious.
shelbo900 wrote:
serena wrote:
At the end of the article they tell us who the runner is and of course it is a woman.
They do? Can someone copy and paste? It’s behind a paywall
The document summarizing the arbitrator’s reasoning, which was prepared for U.S.A. Track & Field and the United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee so they could impose the lifetime ban, does not name Salazar’s accuser. It does provide enough details to identify the person, by describing the athlete’s relationship to Salazar and giving details about the alleged incidents. The Times, which generally does not identify people who may be victims of sexual assault, is declining to publish those and other identifying details.
Salazar’s accuser did not respond to messages seeking comment for this article.
coachy wrote:
My money is on Mary Cain
Obviously Galen
carmine9 wrote:
So the NY Times did not properly investigate the lies that led us into war, but you are sure they thoroughly investigated the a sexual assault allegation?
What?
Again, they are reporting the content of the report, not investigating the allegation. Presumably that was done by Safesport (if at all).
3 posts were removed from this page.