Dejavu from Shelby threads.
Dejavu from Shelby threads.
OP wrote, "I can't believe we're actually going to pretend she's doing this clean." That's a clear doping accusation. It's not speculation, it's a doping accusation. And the Lets Run note on the post is hilarious....libel is encouraged because it leads to less cheating.
The OP documented a time progression which he/xhe is free to disbelieve, but summarizing it with a clear doping accusation is libelous.
She’s extremely suspicious. She just set an American record in the marathon at 37 years old and now ranks #22 on the WORLD all time list. She just ran the marathon just barely above the pace (literally only 6 seconds per mile) over her 5K and 10K PB. She’s been tested by USADA once each in 2020 and 2021. That’s it. I’m guessing she’s microdosing EPO.
Puddin head Joe wrote:
OP wrote, "I can't believe we're actually going to pretend she's doing this clean." That's a clear doping accusation. It's not speculation, it's a doping accusation. And the Lets Run note on the post is hilarious....libel is encouraged because it leads to less cheating.
The OP documented a time progression which he/xhe is free to disbelieve, but summarizing it with a clear doping accusation is libelous.
Accusations are, by their nature, speculative. Libel would be saying “Keira D’Amato is a convicted doper” which simply isn’t true.
Barry Badrinath wrote:
Puddin head Joe wrote:
OP wrote, "I can't believe we're actually going to pretend she's doing this clean." That's a clear doping accusation. It's not speculation, it's a doping accusation. And the Lets Run note on the post is hilarious....libel is encouraged because it leads to less cheating.
The OP documented a time progression which he/xhe is free to disbelieve, but summarizing it with a clear doping accusation is libelous.
Accusations are, by their nature, speculative. Libel would be saying “Keira D’Amato is a convicted doper” which simply isn’t true.
Or something like "I personally injected Keira with PEDs"
The OP was clearly offering an opinion.
Innocent till proven guilty.
Coach's note to self:
Make sure you keep improvement levels and race results slow and gradual as your prople progress. Otherwise the sages am armchair experts are gonna come after your runners for a boatload of infractions and breaches.
jamese1045@hotmail.comwrote:
Coach's note to self:
Make sure you keep improvement levels and race results slow and gradual as your prople progress. Otherwise the sages am armchair experts are gonna come after your runners for a boatload of infractions and breaches.
Hope she kept her burrito receipts.
Oppenheimer wrote:
Barry Badrinath wrote:
Accusations are, by their nature, speculative. Libel would be saying “Keira D’Amato is a convicted doper” which simply isn’t true.
Or something like "I personally injected Keira with PEDs"
The OP was clearly offering an opinion.
It's a false statement. She's doing it clean. It's published, false, and injurious.
Puddin head Joe wrote:
Oppenheimer wrote:
Or something like "I personally injected Keira with PEDs"
The OP was clearly offering an opinion.
It's a false statement. She's doing it clean. It's published, false, and injurious.
That's not how any of this works.
Nothing weird about a 37 year old mother of two to break a long-standing distance running record.
Just eats a lot of burritos, I guess.
slaaa wrote:
Sally Vixxxxxxxxens wrote:
If a 2;10 guy gets turned in to a 2:04 guy, why are all American 2:10 guys still 2:10 guys? Ain't no American guys running 2:04.
what american 210 guys? We have a bunch of 212 guys running 209 because of the shoes...
Yep, I was just going to say . . .
She has an AR and you have your mom's basement.
former democratt wrote:
Nothing weird about a 37 year old mother of two to break a long-standing distance running record.
Just eats a lot of burritos, I guess.
haha.
Nothing strange about a former 6th place finisher in NCAA XC having untapped potential in the marathon. It’s almost like humans have immense potential to run very far at moderately quick pace as long as they take care of their bodies and work hard.
FartKing69 wrote:
Puddin head Joe wrote:
It's a false statement. She's doing it clean. It's published, false, and injurious.
That's not how any of this works.
Sure, I'd like to see OP hide behind the public figure canard. On the legal advice of "FartKing69" lol.
Eyes are looking Goodr wrote:
Nothing strange about a former 6th place finisher in NCAA XC having untapped potential in the marathon. It’s almost like humans have immense potential to run very far at moderately quick pace as long as they take care of their bodies and work hard.
Oh God. Here were go. People waiting to peak until they're middle-aged.
All pro records in this sport are suspect. It is PEDs all the time.
Eyes are looking Goodr wrote:
Nothing strange about a former 6th place finisher in NCAA XC having untapped potential in the marathon. It’s almost like humans have immense potential to run very far at moderately quick pace as long as they take care of their bodies and work hard.
Yes, there’s nothing strange about a former 6th place NCAA finisher running a good marathon. The key word there is “good,” like 2:30 good. Also, “as long as they take care of their bodies.” What is it that you think PEDs do? It enables an athlete to recover and repair their body after an immense volume or intensity of training.
imsus wrote:
LetsRun note: it is LetsRun policy to let people speculate about drugs for all athletes as we believe it leads to a cleaner sport
Explain how, exactly, you think this contributes at all to having a "cleaner sport."