The lame stream media are trying to bury this news guys.
Let’s make sure we don’t let them.
The lame stream media are trying to bury this news guys.
Let’s make sure we don’t let them.
donakd t wrote:
The lame stream media are trying to bury this news guys.
Let’s make sure we don’t let them.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10212817/Jeffrey-Epstein-Donald-Trumps-wingman-theyd-run-wild-beauty-pageant.html
The OP couldn’t have been more wrong. The MSM are loving this, wall to wall coverage because they think makes Trump and the conservative British establishment look bad.
Damn Libs.
Donald 'Grab the P' Trump does a great job of making himself look BAD 😔
Espionage: a family affair
CoJiT was started by Ian and Kevin Maxwell, sons of disgraced media tycoon Robert, former owner of The Daily Mirror newspaper. Ian is still a director of the think tank, although Kevin’s name is now nowhere to be found on its website. Apart from his publishing empire, Robert Maxwell is well-known to have been an Israeli intelligence asset before his mysterious death aboard his luxury yacht in 1991. First recruited by the intelligence services in the 1960s, he began buying up Israeli tech companies in the 1980s, some of which were official service providers for the Mossad, according to his biographers Gordon Thomas and Martin Dillon. The Israeli spying agency used these computer firms to provide cover to its agents worldwide, helping them carry out clandestine activities around the globe.
Maxwell is also suspected of providing a wide range of services to the national security state, so much so that when he died, his body was flown to Israel for a full state funeral fit for a “national hero,” as The Washington Post reported at the time. This surprised many casual onlookers, as Maxwell had no formal public connection whatsoever to the Jewish state until three years previously. He was honored with a funeral at the Mount of Olives in Jerusalem, one of the holiest sites in Judaism, the spot from which Jesus is said to have ascended to heaven. His interment was attended by many government and intelligence officials, including then-Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir, who eulogized him as a hero of Israel.
In the United Kingdom, however, he is undoubtedly remembered less fondly, known mostly for his gigantic financial embezzlement scandal that left his workforce’s retirement plans in tatters. As the newspaper The Scotsman remarked ten years later in 2001,
If [Maxwell] was despised in life, he was hated in death when it emerged he had stolen 440 million [pounds] from the pension fund of Mirror Group Newspapers. He was, officially, the biggest thief in British criminal history.
The government inquest into the scandal was damning for Maxwell’s son, too. “The extent of Mr. Robert Maxwell’s activity was known to Mr. Kevin Maxwell and some of those closely associated with Mr. Robert Maxwell,” it noted, adding that “[t]he primary responsibility rests with Mr. Robert Maxwell. In addition Mr. Kevin Maxwell bears a heavy responsibility in respect of many of the events.” Left with a business empire in tatters, his sons were unable to cope, with Kevin becoming the largest bankruptcy case in U.K. history.
Most accounts of the family present Ian and Kevin as relentlessly browbeaten and dominated by their father. Largely spurned in life, reports state that Kevin in particular is consumed by an overwhelming desire to be “his dad reincorporated,” of whom he is still in awe. Certainly, Ian and Kevin appear to have similar, eyebrow-raising business ties. At one point Ian was a director of 31 companies, Kevin 24, despite some of them hemorrhaging money.
If Ian and Kevin took over Robert’s business mantle, others have already gone into the other family business. Isabel, another of the nine Maxwell siblings, continued her father’s exploits in tech — and in Israel. Described by investigative journalist Whitney Webb as “Israel’s back door into Silicon Valley,” Isabel used Robert’s connections to strike deals with some of the tech world’s biggest players, including Microsoft co-founders Bill Gates and Paul Allen. She told Israeli newspaper Haaretz that she saw her work in tech as an opportunity to “continue her father’s commitment to the country. In 2001, Isabel vowed to “work only on things involving Israel.” In a more overtly political move, she also accepted a position as the governor of the Peres Centre for Peace.
Bump
She was found guilty.
* No sexual assault victims named names.
* Prosecution did not call witnesses they knew who would name names.
* Defense did not place any witnesses on stand who would name names including G. Maxwell.
I PERSONALLY WOULD LIKE TO KNOW HER POLITICAL LEANINGS BEFORE I CONDEMN HER ACTIONS
NotPC wrote:
Bump
She was found guilty.
Yep.
And nobody else even indicted
carmine9 wrote:
NotPC wrote:
Bump
She was found guilty.
Yep.
And nobody else even indicted
True and anyone with half a brain knows many protected individuals breathed a sigh of relief. Among them: bill Gates, bill and Hillary Clinton, Mark Zuckerberg, Prince Andrew, Donald Trump amongst a litany of others.
carmine9 wrote:
NotPC wrote:
Bump
She was found guilty.
Yep.
And nobody else even indicted
Well, nobody other than Epstein himself.
Who else should be indicted?
The Lily Hammer wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
Yep.
And nobody else even indicted
Well, nobody other than Epstein himself.
Who else should be indicted?
Donald Trump, Bill Gates, Bill Clinton to name a few.
that was a high regulated criminal trial wrote:
* No sexual assault victims named names.
* Prosecution did not call witnesses they knew who would name names.
* Defense did not place any witnesses on stand who would name names including G. Maxwell.
There's no evidence that Trump, Clinton or anyone else besudes Maxwell, shared in Epstein's criminal activity. Appearing with him in a photo or getting a ride on his plane is not proof of anything. You're assuming that although he knew he could spend the rest of his life in prison if caught, Epstein was offering sex with minors to several people with no concern about one of them reporting it to the authorities. Another assumption is that Trump and Clinton are sexual deviants that have no concern about the victims someday testifying against them or being blackmailed.
If you were hanging out with a rich guy that offered you sex with a minor would you go for it? I assume not so why do you believe people with a 100 times more to lose than you would partake.
There are no famous people for Maxwell name and why didn't she testify in her own trial?
SDSU Aztec wrote:
that was a high regulated criminal trial wrote:
* No sexual assault victims named names.
* Prosecution did not call witnesses they knew who would name names.
* Defense did not place any witnesses on stand who would name names including G. Maxwell.
There's no evidence that Trump, Clinton or anyone else besudes Maxwell, shared in Epstein's criminal activity. Appearing with him in a photo or getting a ride on his plane is not proof of anything. You're assuming that although he knew he could spend the rest of his life in prison if caught, Epstein was offering sex with minors to several people with no concern about one of them reporting it to the authorities. Another assumption is that Trump and Clinton are sexual deviants that have no concern about the victims someday testifying against them or being blackmailed.
If you were hanging out with a rich guy that offered you sex with a minor would you go for it? I assume not so why do you believe people with a 100 times more to lose than you would partake.
There are no famous people for Maxwell name and why didn't she testify in her own trial?
Prosecutor: "Ms Maxwell, isnt it true that you have first hand knowledge of Slick Willy having sexual relations with underage girls?"
Maxwell: "Ummmmm, ahhhhhhhh.......... I plead the fifth?"
Next morning shes found in her cell mysteriously dead....
SDSU Aztec wrote:
that was a high regulated criminal trial wrote:
* No sexual assault victims named names.
* Prosecution did not call witnesses they knew who would name names.
* Defense did not place any witnesses on stand who would name names including G. Maxwell.
There's no evidence that Trump, Clinton or anyone else besudes Maxwell, shared in Epstein's criminal activity. Appearing with him in a photo or getting a ride on his plane is not proof of anything. You're assuming that although he knew he could spend the rest of his life in prison if caught, Epstein was offering sex with minors to several people with no concern about one of them reporting it to the authorities. Another assumption is that Trump and Clinton are sexual deviants that have no concern about the victims someday testifying against them or being blackmailed.
If you were hanging out with a rich guy that offered you sex with a minor would you go for it? I assume not so why do you believe people with a 100 times more to lose than you would partake.
There are no famous people for Maxwell name and why didn't she testify in her own trial?
One or more than one of Epstein victims years ago DID name names to investigators, specifically Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz and others. That trial was highly regulated. Alan Dershowitz has bluffed very well. Alan Dershowitz has threatened to ruin people financially in civil court. Dershowitz, I am sure has opened a bottle of champagne.
Stating there were no famous people for G. Maxwell to name, I don't believe you really believe that. Naming names would be simply going Scorched Earth. Naming names would not have made G. Maxwell not guilty or even less guilty.
Hey the Clinton kill list is pretty extensive. I'm sure these people are aware of the capabilities.
Steve The Addict OFFICIAL -----^^^^^ wrote:
Hey the Clinton kill list is pretty extensive. I'm sure these people are aware of the capabilities.
How does it feel waking up in a conspiracy whackoland every single day of your life?
I hope you're life finds some meaning beyond chasing fantasies in an online forum.
RIrunnerz wrote:
The Lily Hammer wrote:
Well, nobody other than Epstein himself.
Who else should be indicted?
Donald Trump, Bill Gates, Bill Clinton to name a few.
What crime did they commit, and what evidence of this do you have?
The Lily Hammer wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
Yep.
And nobody else even indicted
Well, nobody other than Epstein himself.
Who else should be indicted?
Begin with all those who engaged in sex with underaged girls.
Then onto those who were blackmailing them.
that was a high regulated criminal trial wrote:
SDSU Aztec wrote:
There's no evidence that Trump, Clinton or anyone else besudes Maxwell, shared in Epstein's criminal activity. Appearing with him in a photo or getting a ride on his plane is not proof of anything. You're assuming that although he knew he could spend the rest of his life in prison if caught, Epstein was offering sex with minors to several people with no concern about one of them reporting it to the authorities. Another assumption is that Trump and Clinton are sexual deviants that have no concern about the victims someday testifying against them or being blackmailed.
If you were hanging out with a rich guy that offered you sex with a minor would you go for it? I assume not so why do you believe people with a 100 times more to lose than you would partake.
There are no famous people for Maxwell name and why didn't she testify in her own trial?
One or more than one of Epstein victims years ago DID name names to investigators, specifically Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz and others. That trial was highly regulated. Alan Dershowitz has bluffed very well. Alan Dershowitz has threatened to ruin people financially in civil court. Dershowitz, I am sure has opened a bottle of champagne.
Stating there were no famous people for G. Maxwell to name, I don't believe you really believe that. Naming names would be simply going Scorched Earth. Naming names would not have made G. Maxwell not guilty or even less guilty.
It's still guilt by association. If someone appeared in a photo with Ted Bundy, were they taking part in the murders? All his life, Trump has been with tall adult women with nice racks and you believe he's going to interested in sex with a minor? Clinton is smart and would assume there would be a video to later be used against him. And neither of them would be concerned about going to prison and having their reputations destroyed? Both of them are extremely wealthy and if they were into sex with minors, they could arrange for it to happen with far less chance of getting caught.
Even being offered the opportunity is not credible. "He offered me sex with a minor, but I said no and stopped hanging out with him" is not a good story.
Yeah, I'll wait until she talks before diving into conspiracy theories and gossip stuff, I was just glad to see that someone that rich and that connected could be convicted.
I was much more concerned with the law and order part of this than gossip column stuff.