Speculating that this is it. I have a Garmin 35 and 645 music and the wrist HR is so damn inaccurate for any activity.
Seppo Kaitenenn wrote:
3). He's using a wrist-based HR monitor which is inaccurate.
Speculating that this is it. I have a Garmin 35 and 645 music and the wrist HR is so damn inaccurate for any activity.
Seppo Kaitenenn wrote:
3). He's using a wrist-based HR monitor which is inaccurate.
My HR is around 120 for my easy runs. I'm 40. RHR is in the high 30s. HR of 160 is race pace for me - definitely no conversation happening. So, not quite 110. But I'm sure I could jog a bit slower and hit 110.
This is it. I run about 75-76 min for a half these days and 2:38 for the full.
My easy running HR is like 135 +/- 10bpm (4:30ish per km)
If I run with my wife at 5:40/km my HR is about 110 +/- 10bmp
I use a polar OH1 because its far better than the wrist POS which may give me 160-180 for the same easy run.
Yeah my resting HR is 35-40. Same age.
Ghrelin wrote:
For the 1,000,000th time, wrist-based HR is not that accurate. Especially if you're looking at someone else's run. You don't know if he bothered to let it lock on, if it was tight enough, etc.
But he's running slowly enough that ~120 (within the range of error) is believable.
Yes. Also, being that it is winter, is there any chance the watch was worn OVER a long sleeve shirt? That would for sure mess up the reading even more.
I am 38 years old. A stent in my LAD and my resting heart rate is in the 30's. The ability to drop a very low heart rate has to do with solid fitness but mainly genetics.
High 30’s kinda low you might need to be checked if it keeps dropping unless ok with dying. People thinks that super low is better but is not true. Human hearts don’t do well at very low HR.
Stent at 38? and now HR 30’s?
Can you exert ?
CAD that young obviously is not good.
No details about yourself but doubt ok to be running.
coachmandy wrote:
he was pacing True Love
I've been dying to know for ages...is that his wife's actual name or a nickname he has for her?
Well it’s all mostly fake for the camera. They don’t really care for each other much.
Did you really just ask if her real name is true love??
My Mom is the exact same way. Ridiculously low RHR. Doctors ask her if she's sure she's alive.
My sister has a CHD, and I had my heart pretty thoroughly checked out about ten years ago to make sure I didn't have the same issue. The cardiologist didn't say anything about my low RHR.
dr no wrote:
How does a good runner even run a 9 min pace ? So slow he must not attain any type of conditioning from it . Maybe on a cool down after a race 9 min mile runs are justified but man come on . Keep it around 730
This is Letsrun.
They think that mileage should be done at super slow jogging pace and that's beneficial.
mr progression here wrote:
I honestly think you’d be hard pressed to find others who train that slow at that level. Seth appears to follow Lydiard like a cultist. Most guys his level train around 100-110 at 7:30ish if I had to guess
From what i'v seen his training is nothing at all like Lydiard.
His watch is wrong, and you have no idea what his max is, try and find a hard 5k from his Strava and extrapolate it from that. I'd guess is 160 odd.
dr no wrote:
How does a good runner even run a 9 min pace ? So slow he must not attain any type of conditioning from it . Maybe on a cool down after a race 9 min mile runs are justified but man come on . Keep it around 730
Have you got any scientific reason for this cut-off? Or is purely based on not wanting to post 'slow' runs on Strava?
i know seth wrote:
Well it’s all mostly fake for the camera. They don’t really care for each other much.
It doesn’t seem like he actually likes his kids either.
Kenaneeser Beckelay wrote:
i know seth wrote:
Well it’s all mostly fake for the camera. They don’t really care for each other much.
It doesn’t seem like he actually likes his kids either.
Lol, the few posts I've seen he's totally gushing on his kids and wife.
Over40 wrote:
dr no wrote:
How does a good runner even run a 9 min pace ? So slow he must not attain any type of conditioning from it . Maybe on a cool down after a race 9 min mile runs are justified but man come on . Keep it around 730
Have you got any scientific reason for this cut-off? Or is purely based on not wanting to post 'slow' runs on Strava?
The science suggests that there is almost no aerobic benefit to running much slower than around 90% of MP (or the pace where blood lactate creeps above baseline).
That doesn't necessarily mean that there aren't aerobic benefits or at least non-aerobic benefits that are relevant to performance. It just means that they aren't verified. Which is fine. If we only did things that were verified by science, our training would be terrible.
800 dude wrote:
The science suggests that there is almost no aerobic benefit to running much slower than around 90% of MP (or the pace where blood lactate creeps above baseline).
You referring to the "science" you just made up?
It is just a ton of evidence in seeing most other proffesional athletes besides running that train mostly at what hobbyjoggers would suggest is barely training-heartrate. For instance cross country skiers.