Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Trollminator wrote:

Runningart2004 wrote:

Do you think Erdogan let that pastor go because he likes Trump or fears him? Here’s another deal about to blow up in Trump’s hands. Turkey wants some Saudi head to roll, so now Trump needs to deliver that head. Since we all know he won’t, he’s going to prove yet again that the US can’t be trusted and doesn’t honor its agreements or respect its allies. You are a gullible fool if you think somehow Trump is winning here.

Nearly all of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi. We didn’t flip on them then and we aren’t flipping now over a journalist who’s AGAINST a progressive Saudi Arabia and FOR the Muslim Brotherhood.

I see maybe some finger waiving.

Alan

Astounding you have bought the Saudi fiction about what this journalist stood for. In the real world, his record is quite different.

Not so fast bro wrote:

Just another day on the Trump hypocrisy train.

"A man or woman, must always be presumed innocent unless, and until proven guilty," Trump said at Kavanaugh's swearing-in ceremony on Monday night. "And with that, I must state that you, sir, under historic scrutiny, were proven innocent."

https://gemstatepatriot.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/lock-her-up.jpg

Shocker!

Simon Armitrage wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

Nearly all of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi. We didn’t flip on them then and we aren’t flipping now over a journalist who’s AGAINST a progressive Saudi Arabia and FOR the Muslim Brotherhood.

I see maybe some finger waiving.

Alan

Astounding you have bought the Saudi fiction about what this journalist stood for. In the real world, his record is quite different.

What is his record in the real world? Please provide your credible sources.

Game Changer wrote:

Confederates wrote:

Meanwhile, Trump is out there praising Robert E Lee.

He's just catering to his base of white supremicists.

Trump is the kind of guy who puts his thumb in the air to gauge the weather instead of checking it online. He thinks as long as his rallies kick a$$ he’s got it under control. As long as the fat fvck bikers, knuckle draggers, white trash and other degenerates keep showing and chanting lock her up he thinks he’s good to go for 2020. He forgets those numbers are limited and he hit the vote ceiling in 2016. That base isn’t growing.

Not your choice wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Ha ha ha! You are incorrect on all of that in every possible way. $40 an hour for 40 hours a week with what most people might bill of 50 weeks a year would be $80,000. Ha ha ha! I would NEVER work 50 weeks a year for only $80,000. I wouldn't work 30 hour a week for only 45 weeks a year for only $80,000...though to be fair, I don't need an income of anything anymore. Maybe I will cut this down to just three more years and then quit altogether.

You aren’t making more than $80K for what you described. No way, no how.

Why does it bother you If he makes more?

Flagpole wrote:

Not your choice wrote:

Now's time on Sprockets vhen ve dance!

You aren’t making more than $80K for what you described. No way, no how.

Now's time on Sprockets vhen ve dance!

You forgot to post the link for max effect

Trollminator wrote:

Simon Armitrage wrote:

Astounding you have bought the Saudi fiction about what this journalist stood for. In the real world, his record is quite different.

What is his record in the real world? Please provide your credible sources.

Well he wrote in an obscure publication called the Washington Post extensively about restoring Saudi Arabia to pre-1979 conditions with regard to human rights, and advancing the kingdom toward European standards with regard to women's rights. He was in favor of publications that allowed multiple voices--people who disagreed with one another. You probably do not have enough background to understand the significance of this in the context of the repressive Saudi regime. All you see is "muslim brotherhood" and assume he wants to cut off people's heads. I recommend reading his Washington Post articles.

agip the dip wrote:

agip wrote:

first off, the Clintons did get rich on speaking and books.

Second of all, your defense of tax cheats is 'someone else did it so it's ok if Trump does it.'

third of all, you are either a troll or a paranoid freak.

Or, you're just stupid, eh? Yeah, that's it.

The Clintons stole millions from many sources. You are one IGNORANT piece of liberal lying crap.

We think you must be a paranoid freak over your Trump accusations. What a peabrain you are agip. STUPID!

https://nypost.com/2016/11/05/the-clinton-foundations-off-the-books-20-million-mystery/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmMe-2qaSss

You’re on a Clinton conspiracy binge brother - Iran getting to your head. Shall we start looking at all the shady ways Bush and family made their money? It’s 2018, do try to keep up.

2,000 pages - which means Brojos, please figure out how to truncate these pages numbers. The scrolling on my phone is killing me.

Simon Armitage wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

What is his record in the real world? Please provide your credible sources.

Well he wrote in an obscure publication called the Washington Post extensively about restoring Saudi Arabia to pre-1979 conditions with regard to human rights, and advancing the kingdom toward European standards with regard to women's rights. He was in favor of publications that allowed multiple voices--people who disagreed with one another. You probably do not have enough background to understand the significance of this in the context of the repressive Saudi regime. All you see is "muslim brotherhood" and assume he wants to cut off people's heads. I recommend reading his Washington Post articles.

Misunderstanding - I thought you were questioning his stance on progressivism. I’m well aware of the affront to the regime. The muslim brotherhood thing, hadn’t heard about that before.

Simon Armitage wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

What is his record in the real world? Please provide your credible sources.

Well he wrote in an obscure publication called the Washington Post extensively about restoring Saudi Arabia to pre-1979 conditions with regard to human rights, and advancing the kingdom toward European standards with regard to women's rights. He was in favor of publications that allowed multiple voices--people who disagreed with one another. You probably do not have enough background to understand the significance of this in the context of the repressive Saudi regime. All you see is "muslim brotherhood" and assume he wants to cut off people's heads. I recommend reading his Washington Post articles.

Makes no difference. Alan's point that the US did not flip when a bunch of Saudis flew airplanes into our buildings, killing 3,000+, so the US will not flip over one journalist torture/murder stands. Wouldn't make the slightest difference if he were the second coming.

STSBO wrote:

Simon Armitage wrote:

Well he wrote in an obscure publication called the Washington Post extensively about restoring Saudi Arabia to pre-1979 conditions with regard to human rights, and advancing the kingdom toward European standards with regard to women's rights. He was in favor of publications that allowed multiple voices--people who disagreed with one another. You probably do not have enough background to understand the significance of this in the context of the repressive Saudi regime. All you see is "muslim brotherhood" and assume he wants to cut off people's heads. I recommend reading his Washington Post articles.

Makes no difference. Alan's point that the US did not flip when a bunch of Saudis flew airplanes into our buildings, killing 3,000+, so the US will not flip over one journalist torture/murder stands. Wouldn't make the slightest difference if he were the second coming.

So, Sean Hannity could be murdered and it would be a nothing-burger.

STSBO wrote:

Makes no difference. Alan's point that the US did not flip when a bunch of Saudis flew airplanes into our buildings, killing 3,000+, so the US will not flip over one journalist torture/murder stands. Wouldn't make the slightest difference if he were the second coming.

I'm sick and tired of sucking up to the Saudis.

We have the technology to make Saudi oil obsolete. Let's do it!

Trollminator wrote:

agip the dip wrote:

Or, you're just stupid, eh? Yeah, that's it.

The Clintons stole millions from many sources. You are one IGNORANT piece of liberal lying crap.

We think you must be a paranoid freak over your Trump accusations. What a peabrain you are agip. STUPID!

https://nypost.com/2016/11/05/the-clinton-foundations-off-the-books-20-million-mystery/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmMe-2qaSss

You’re on a Clinton conspiracy binge brother - Iran getting to your head. Shall we start looking at all the shady ways Bush and family made their money? It’s 2018, do try to keep up.

Hi Idiot. Yes, things like this easily fly over your head.

*You voted for her.

*She and her husband stole millions.

*She was the least qualified to be President.

*She did very little to almost zero as a Senator, but co-sign whatever she could to pretend she was busy (you were here target group that she knew would fall for it...you did).

*You're on a Trump conspiracy binge ole' fella.

*You only believe anything negative written about Trump. Anything positive, it was Obummer's doing.

*The President of Haiti could knock on your door and explain what they did...you're such a slave to Hillary that you'd dismiss it (which is what Bill and Hillary would hope for).

*Flagpole is your hero as you have very little to contribute...just nod your head and agree.

*Your Cerebral Cortex never developed past age 5, and that's being kind.

*You would never know what the truth was from either side as you just can't think for yourself.

Fat hurts wrote:

STSBO wrote:

Makes no difference. Alan's point that the US did not flip when a bunch of Saudis flew airplanes into our buildings, killing 3,000+, so the US will not flip over one journalist torture/murder stands. Wouldn't make the slightest difference if he were the second coming.

I'm sick and tired of sucking up to the Saudis.

We have the technology to make Saudi oil obsolete. Let's do it!

You've got all the ideas, so why don't you run for Office Big Guy?

Yeah we actually get most of our oil from Canada. We are not remotely dependent on Saudi oil. I would even argue we are more dependent on Saudi buying our military goods and having a friendly military relationship.

According to Fox News and Don Jr Khashoggi joined the Muslim Brotherhood in the 70s and has taken hard line stances against the Saudi prince trying to modernize the country. But, that seems like a very convenient cover story to CYA.

His recent works do no support the idea that he was a “bad guy”.

Alan

Muderized wrote:

STSBO wrote:

Makes no difference. Alan's point that the US did not flip when a bunch of Saudis flew airplanes into our buildings, killing 3,000+, so the US will not flip over one journalist torture/murder stands. Wouldn't make the slightest difference if he were the second coming.

So, Sean Hannity could be murdered and it would be a nothing-burger.

CORRECT!

Especially if the murderer said something flattering about Trump. Then he would be obviously misunderstood and the victim of Clinton-inspired false allegations.

Fat hurts wrote:

STSBO wrote:

Makes no difference. Alan's point that the US did not flip when a bunch of Saudis flew airplanes into our buildings, killing 3,000+, so the US will not flip over one journalist torture/murder stands. Wouldn't make the slightest difference if he were the second coming.

I'm sick and tired of sucking up to the Saudis.

We have the technology to make Saudi oil obsolete. Let's do it!

Not disagreeing with you, dude. Just pointing out the way it is.

Runningart2004 wrote:

Yeah we actually get most of our oil from Canada. We are not remotely dependent on Saudi oil. I would even argue we are more dependent on Saudi buying our military goods and having a friendly military relationship.

According to Fox News and Don Jr Khashoggi joined the Muslim Brotherhood in the 70s and has taken hard line stances against the Saudi prince trying to modernize the country. But, that seems like a very convenient cover story to CYA.

His recent works do no support the idea that he was a “bad guy”.

Alan

Oil is fungible. It really makes no difference if we get most of our oil from Canada vs Saudi Arabia. What matters is the impact that the Saudis can have on world oil markets.