Among other things, perhaps he could explain to all of us why we’re RACING towards being Hungary and Turkey, and yet the stock market is still saying, “EVERYTHING IS ABSOLUTELY FINE !!!”
If Rubio had won in 2016 (he also would have won in 2020, then, btw) . . . .
Have to disagree on this one. Covid was going to give whoever was elected POTUS in 2016 a one-term presidency.
Believe what you will.
It’s way easier to manage cross-party concerns and get more moderate people who were saying “trust the science” if the president manages messaging well and appears to have a steady hand at the rudder instead of spitballing nonsense ideas like an addled grade-schooler right after spending the first part of the press conference bragging about how much he knows. Do you actually think it’s not easier for people to question the need for the most restrictive type of guidance if their choice is between that and apparent competence as opposed to very restrictive versus chaotic BS?
Even with lockdowns, concerns about education, and job losses, that could be a moment for Trump and his administration even did some decent things, but his ego and incuriousness made him incapable of making that the issue instead of making sure he could be the ringmaster and head clown of the circus from time to time.
A different president also would not have told all his supporters that mail-in ballots were bad and that they should vote in person instead. That alone would have changed the percentages only a small amount, though.
The economy would have done at least as well prior to Covid as it did under Trump in that period.. The messaging on all policies and the way it would have been carried out would have been clearer and more palatable to moderates.
You also wouldn’t have had the substantial built-in anti-Trump contingent (larger than knee-jerk anti-Republican contingent was any time prior to 2018 and perhaps still).
Turnout among the most rabid of the base would have been lower overall, but in purple states, you’d have enough people pleased with demonstrated solid leadership to avoid voting for someone new when the candidates from the other party seemed largely uninspiring to voters.
Have to disagree on this one. Covid was going to give whoever was elected POTUS in 2016 a one-term presidency.
Believe what you will.
It’s way easier to manage cross-party concerns and get more moderate people who were saying “trust the science” if the president manages messaging well and appears to have a steady hand at the rudder instead of spitballing nonsense ideas like an addled grade-schooler right after spending the first part of the press conference bragging about how much he knows. Do you actually think it’s not easier for people to question the need for the most restrictive type of guidance if their choice is between that and apparent competence as opposed to very restrictive versus chaotic BS?
Even with lockdowns, concerns about education, and job losses, that could be a moment for Trump and his administration even did some decent things, but his ego and incuriousness made him incapable of making that the issue instead of making sure he could be the ringmaster and head clown of the circus from time to time.
A different president also would not have told all his supporters that mail-in ballots were bad and that they should vote in person instead. That alone would have changed the percentages only a small amount, though.
The economy would have done at least as well prior to Covid as it did under Trump in that period.. The messaging on all policies and the way it would have been carried out would have been clearer and more palatable to moderates.
You also wouldn’t have had the substantial built-in anti-Trump contingent (larger than knee-jerk anti-Republican contingent was any time prior to 2018 and perhaps still).
Turnout among the most rabid of the base would have been lower overall, but in purple states, you’d have enough people pleased with demonstrated solid leadership to avoid voting for someone new when the candidates from the other party seemed largely uninspiring to voters.
You could have paraphrased this with 3 words. Dems are finished.
If a mother takes Tylenol, there's a good chance her weirdo kids can't pronounce acetaminophen.
The bottom line is that autism is skyrocketing in blue areas. You can't swing a dead cat in your average American classroom without hitting a bunch of vaxxed out retards. Biden's vaxxing plunged us into this mental catastrophe. Trump will fight to get us out and protect Americans from 80 different blends of vaxx additives that are pumped into American kids.
I thought his whole shtick was to go fir a while posting things that are more subtle then lean hard into some really antagonizing and idiotic stuff to see what reaction he’ll get. Then rinse and repeat.
The best option is to not be corrupted by big pharma, start there. Enter Trump. Nobody knows better than MAGA how Democrats will sell their souls to poison our children for money and control.
Then, if you talk back with a cogent argument, they will kill you.
If a mother takes Tylenol, there's a good chance her weirdo kids can't pronounce acetaminophen.
The bottom line is that autism is skyrocketing in blue areas. You can't swing a dead cat in your average American classroom without hitting a bunch of vaxxed out retards. Biden's vaxxing plunged us into this mental catastrophe. Trump will fight to get us out and protect Americans from 80 different blends of vaxx additives that are pumped into American kids.
If a mother takes Tylenol, there's a good chance her weirdo kids can't pronounce acetaminophen.
The bottom line is that autism is skyrocketing in blue areas. You can't swing a dead cat in your average American classroom without hitting a bunch of vaxxed out retards. Biden's vaxxing plunged us into this mental catastrophe. Trump will fight to get us out and protect Americans from 80 different blends of vaxx additives that are pumped into American kids.
What happened to "my body, my choice"?
I think you know goddam well what happened to "my body, my choice."
Does Trump really think he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize ?!?
"Several weeks after President Trump ordered a military strike on a small boat in the Caribbean Sea, killing 11 people supposedly suspected of drug smuggling, this saga has gotten much worse. Last Monday, Trump bombed another vessel, killing three. Again his administration released zero evidence supporting the decision, and the specifics in this case make this campaign look increasingly lawless. And we just learned that the White House is quietly circulating a draft bill that would vastly expand Trump’s authority for these bombings. Its details offer a damning glimpse into how unrestrained he aims to be going forward."
