44.2% Trump RCP approval now!
https://realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.html
44.2% Trump RCP approval now!
https://realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.html
load of trump wrote:
Racks on racks on racks wrote:
..... says the .....
..... Trumpers who swallowed the NO-Russian collusion narrative and the NO-obstruction of justice narrative Trump Loads hook, line, and sinker.
Clintonettes who swallowed the:
I've never lied to the American People narrative
I've never stolen money from foreign countries in need narrative
I've never taken money from HUGE donors and let it affect my decisions.
I never bused in HUGE numbers of minorities to steal the election. Please don't even ask me about the illegals I pushed to vote.
I deleted the emails because...I always do that to important documents so there's no trace and I can lie and play dumb. Wait, can I change my mind as I do that a lot anyways.
What dimwits could ever vote for me?
Wait, the "load of trump" poster is one for sure:)
load of trump wrote:
Racks on racks on racks wrote:
I'm talking about Russian collusion and obstruction of justice, you moran. Wow, you dumm.
Also NOT a trial. You are not smart enough to understand that simple fact.
RACIST LIBERAL ALERT!
So y’all do realize that the use of the special counsel is largely political right? All this talk about indictments doesn’t really mean much. Clinton was impeached, but not indicted.
Alan
BigTrumpBoss wrote:
44.2% Trump RCP approval now!
https://realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.html
Meh, you’re grasping at straws. Take the last 10 polls. Remove one each high and low outlier, then give me an average. While you’re at it look at the disapproval numbers and the gap. Not many undecideds.
Alan
Runningart2004 wrote:
BigTrumpBoss wrote:
44.2% Trump RCP approval now!
https://realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.htmlMeh, you’re grasping at straws. Take the last 10 polls. Remove one each high and low outlier, then give me an average. While you’re at it look at the disapproval numbers and the gap. Not many undecideds.
Alan
You seem to not know the meaning of a lot of what you say. "Grasping at straws," for instance. It refers to a position or statement that is based on weak evidence, or based on just a certain part of a larger pool of facts so as to sway the conclusion.
Simply citing the RCP poll of polls current value is not "grasping at straws." It is the poll of polls. It is all of the data available, which is used day in and day out. No grasping here at all.
You also don't understand what an outlier is. The highest and lowest numbers are not necessarily outliers. An outlier is an "extreme deviation from the mean." None of the polls in the RCP poll of polls fit that definition. Some may be regularly lower than the mean, and some are regularly higher than the mean, but they're all pretty tightly packed from a statistical standpoint (there aren't any "22%" or "68%" approval ratings popping up, which would be outliers).
You need to just stop, as you just keep digging your hole of being wrong deeper and deeper. This seems to be a pattern from the Left on this site- just keep doubling down over and over. Weird.
BigTrumpBoss wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:
Meh, you’re grasping at straws. Take the last 10 polls. Remove one each high and low outlier, then give me an average. While you’re at it look at the disapproval numbers and the gap. Not many undecideds.
Alan
You seem to not know the meaning of a lot of what you say. "Grasping at straws," for instance. It refers to a position or statement that is based on weak evidence, or based on just a certain part of a larger pool of facts so as to sway the conclusion.
Simply citing the RCP poll of polls current value is not "grasping at straws." It is the poll of polls. It is all of the data available, which is used day in and day out. No grasping here at all.
You also don't understand what an outlier is. The highest and lowest numbers are not necessarily outliers. An outlier is an "extreme deviation from the mean." None of the polls in the RCP poll of polls fit that definition. Some may be regularly lower than the mean, and some are regularly higher than the mean, but they're all pretty tightly packed from a statistical standpoint (there aren't any "22%" or "68%" approval ratings popping up, which would be outliers).
You need to just stop, as you just keep digging your hole of being wrong deeper and deeper. This seems to be a pattern from the Left on this site- just keep doubling down over and over. Weird.
You are incorrectly calling me a leftist.
Whatever you want to call his numbers, they are still historically low when taken as a whole. No other president has been elected with such a low popular vote, except when there was a serious 3rd party candidate.
Trump won’t win in 2020. He’s a very unpopular president.
Alan
Runningart2004 wrote:
BigTrumpBoss wrote:
You seem to not know the meaning of a lot of what you say. "Grasping at straws," for instance. It refers to a position or statement that is based on weak evidence, or based on just a certain part of a larger pool of facts so as to sway the conclusion.
Simply citing the RCP poll of polls current value is not "grasping at straws." It is the poll of polls. It is all of the data available, which is used day in and day out. No grasping here at all.
You also don't understand what an outlier is. The highest and lowest numbers are not necessarily outliers. An outlier is an "extreme deviation from the mean." None of the polls in the RCP poll of polls fit that definition. Some may be regularly lower than the mean, and some are regularly higher than the mean, but they're all pretty tightly packed from a statistical standpoint (there aren't any "22%" or "68%" approval ratings popping up, which would be outliers).
You need to just stop, as you just keep digging your hole of being wrong deeper and deeper. This seems to be a pattern from the Left on this site- just keep doubling down over and over. Weird.
You are incorrectly calling me a leftist.
Whatever you want to call his numbers, they are still historically low when taken as a whole. No other president has been elected with such a low popular vote, except when there was a serious 3rd party candidate.
Trump won’t win in 2020. He’s a very unpopular president.
Alan
Shut up, Hillary loving EKU drop out. Everyone, this clown was the joke of the campus.
L L wrote:
I like the idea of blanket primaries.
Maybe even more than one primary.
Have one prelim with any number of candidates and the top 4 go the next primary.
Then vote again and the top two, regardless of political party go to the November general election.
Then no one runs to their base and then to the middle.
Each step would be to campaign to appeal to the most people.
And everyone gets a say as to who the final two are, instead of two different groups of people choosing the final two.
Thanks for your comment. I guess other people are more interested in bashing one another.
EKU-grad wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:
You are incorrectly calling me a leftist.
Whatever you want to call his numbers, they are still historically low when taken as a whole. No other president has been elected with such a low popular vote, except when there was a serious 3rd party candidate.
Trump won’t win in 2020. He’s a very unpopular president.
Alan
Shut up, Hillary loving EKU drop out. Everyone, this clown was the joke of the campus.
Agree
Most recent polling has been a bit more favorable to the GOP. Democratic House likelihood dropped below 80% on 538 for the first time in weeks. Democratic senate chance dropped to 28.9% after opening at 34% several weeks ago. Trump approval up to 41.6% there after being as low as 39.9% a month or so ago.
I have been playing the Democratic "No" on senate control on Predictit steadily with the shares at 65 cents or less. I think that is a value wager. There were plenty of 63 and 64 cent blocks over the weekend and I swooped them up.
Democrats have advantage in 2018 but the real story, as I've emphasized countless times, is the very conservative Silent Generation born 1928-1945 dying out and being replaced on the voter rolls by much more liberal younger voters who will remain loyally blue for life.
Here is the latest evidence of what those registration drives are producing:
http://time.com/5411948/national-voter-registration-drive-record-midterm-elections/
EKU-grad wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:
You are incorrectly calling me a leftist.
Whatever you want to call his numbers, they are still historically low when taken as a whole. No other president has been elected with such a low popular vote, except when there was a serious 3rd party candidate.
Trump won’t win in 2020. He’s a very unpopular president.
Alan
Shut up, Hillary loving EKU drop out. Everyone, this clown was the joke of the campus.
Again getting it wrong....I never voted for Hillary. I didn’t support Bernie either.
Alan
I’m going to take a chance and say this is a safe letsrun space to type the word M.AGA ?
Yessssssssss.
Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine AM?
RCP has Trump approval rating up to 44.2% !!!
He's looking Presidential
XY wrote:
RCP has Trump approval rating up to 44.2% !!!
He's looking Presidential
538
Approve 41.8%
Disapprove 52.7%
Trump is losing by 10.9%
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
The left is terrified of other ideas. They quickly cut off a m.a.g.a. hat wearing Kanye West last night on SNL during his pro-Trump monologue. Free speech doesn't count on SNL if it slants conservative.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/30/arts/music/kanye-west-donald-trump-snl.html
This is the part where I point out to you that his name is Ye and that SNL always cuts off at that point and instead of you admitting you are wrong and retracting you instead take false pride in not knowing anything about SNL or West.
Oh, oh,. Disaster for Trump.
Trump Engaged in Suspect Tax Schemes as He Reaped Riches From His Father
The president has long sold himself as a self-made billionaire, but a Times investigation found that he received at least $413 million in today’s dollars from his father’s real estate empire, much of it through illegal tax dodges in the 1990s.
Trump Taxes Unleased wrote:
Oh, oh,. Disaster for Trump.
Trump Engaged in Suspect Tax Schemes as He Reaped Riches From His Father
The president has long sold himself as a self-made billionaire, but a Times investigation found that he received at least $413 million in today’s dollars from his father’s real estate empire, much of it through illegal tax dodges in the 1990s.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/10/02/us/politics/donald-trump-tax-schemes-fred-trump.html?mtrref=undefined
Will THIS be enough to put this criminal in an orange jumpsuit? How many crimes does he get to commit? When will the law control this animal?
"Much of this money came to Mr. Trump because he helped his parents dodge taxes. He and his siblings set up a sham corporation to disguise millions of dollars in gifts from their parents, records and interviews show. Records indicate that Mr. Trump helped his father take improper tax deductions worth millions more. He also helped formulate a strategy to undervalue his parents’ real estate holdings by hundreds of millions of dollars on tax returns, sharply reducing the tax bill when those properties were transferred to him and his siblings."