Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

EPlC Flagpole wrote:

Welp, it's that time again. Time to add yet another month to Flagpole's Epic Flagpole streak. I noticed my post from yesterday was deleted out of pure butthurtness, but I suppose that's to be expected nowadays. It truly is unreal how the Left has accepted censorship of ideas as their position now. Unbelievable.

I'll have to be a bit more brief than yesterday, but here we go...

Initial Kavanaugh hearing was a joke, as Dems made it clear that stall, stall, stall was their strategy.

Anonymous Op-Ed from the NYT was supposedly from a senior admin official, though it's more likely from the NYT itself as Roger Stone believes.

The Woodward book has had little impact, though he does admit that he "saw no evidence of Russian collusion, despite looking hard for two solid years."

Manafort reached a plea deal, which was finally going to bring Trump down!!...until it was stated that everything in the deal related to activities well before Trump's campaign.

The Google All-Hands video... watch it... it is the most hilarious thing you'll see this month... actual adults talking to other adults about how to cope with the outcome of an election... it's truly remarkable... these are our "best and brightest." LOL

Since the official hearing didn't go their way, guess what strategy was pulled out from the Left on Judge Kavanaugh? Yep- the ollllld sexual assault/hate women strategy! Luckily, the accuser had huge gaps in her story, and none of the people she names at the site even remember the party took place.

Then, after being exposed for working against the POTUS45, Rosenstein tries to set a trap by saying "he's willing to resign, but not if asked to." There's more to come out regarding his complicit actions, which is why he's fighting back hard against Trump declassifying everything. The DOJ/FBI conspiracy against the Trump campaign and presidency is forcing all the rats into emergency mode. It's so fun to watch.

All the while, Trump's RCP approval rating has rebounded right back up to the 44% that is was prior to the manufactured dip (by including new, less frequent polls) a couple weeks ago.

But alas, it is just another crazy month in the era of butthurt Libs and establishment-types. And another month must be added to the Flagpole's Flagpole streak.

Mueller will not be coming (in addition to him stating as much, other honest folks on the Left are starting to see it).

The clown has been, currently is, and will always be Flagpole.

Current status of Flagpole's Flagpole Streak: 32+ months

EPlC Flagpole wrote:

Runningart2004 wrote:

And 43% approval is still historically low compared to other presidents at this point in their terms.

So assuming Mueller publishes a report....what do you think will be his findings? And how do you think those findings will affect 2020?

At a bare minimum I think he will find that those in Trump’s campaign attempted to conspire with Russian agents to affect the 2016 election. Anything specifically connected to Trump I believe will be hard to prove, except for maybe obstruction.

So how does all the kryponite laying around affect 2020? Trump won in 2016 with 46% of the popular vote and no real 3rd party threat and a very real anti-Clinton vote across both parties and not independents.

I just don’t see the math where Trump wins.

Alan

Just to keep things in perspective, you know Bill Clinton never even received 50% of the vote either, right?

His findings aren't going to include anything about Trump colluding with Russia, as is fairly obvious by now. Millions and millions of idiotic articles, social media posts, 24 hours of talking heads shows will all be for naught. A complete waste of time. But will anyone EVER admit they were duped into yet another US Intel community fabricated narrative? I bet NOT. No one will come out and admit how gullible they were, and how their TDS drove them to be so blind.

Like collusion, there will be no obstruction found, as he did not obstruct anything real. He wanted the establishment / Intel community to make public that there was no Russian collusion, and they just wouldn't do it. It would hurt them too bad to admit that most people in the country don't trust them and hate their guts. Their objective was and is to delegitimize his epic upset victory at every turn.

So question to you: Are you one of the resident TDS Lefties around here not acknowledging the DOJ/FBI conspiracy against the Trump campaign and presidency? The 15+ now LEADERS of the DOJ/FBI that have been fired or forced to resign because of wrongdoing, all relating to improper steps taken during the HRC investigation and subsequent Russia hoax?

DataFact wrote:

Runningart2004 wrote:

And 43% approval is still historically low compared to other presidents at this point in their terms.

So assuming Mueller publishes a report....what do you think will be his findings? And how do you think those findings will affect 2020?

At a bare minimum I think he will find that those in Trump’s campaign attempted to conspire with Russian agents to affect the 2016 election. Anything specifically connected to Trump I believe will be hard to prove, except for maybe obstruction.

So how does all the kryponite laying around affect 2020? Trump won in 2016 with 46% of the popular vote and no real 3rd party threat and a very real anti-Clinton vote across both parties and not independents.

I just don’t see the math where Trump wins.

Alan

Did you even care to look up your claim about approval ratings "this far into" a presidency? Obama's had already eroded to EXACTLY what Trump's is at the moment (44%). This despite the obvious MSM fawning over him treatment.

http://i.bnet.com/blogs/gallup-approval-ratings-for-obama.png

Runningart2004 wrote:

EPlC Flagpole wrote:

Just to keep things in perspective, you know Bill Clinton never even received 50% of the vote either, right?

His findings aren't going to include anything about Trump colluding with Russia, as is fairly obvious by now. Millions and millions of idiotic articles, social media posts, 24 hours of talking heads shows will all be for naught. A complete waste of time. But will anyone EVER admit they were duped into yet another US Intel community fabricated narrative? I bet NOT. No one will come out and admit how gullible they were, and how their TDS drove them to be so blind.

Like collusion, there will be no obstruction found, as he did not obstruct anything real. He wanted the establishment / Intel community to make public that there was no Russian collusion, and they just wouldn't do it. It would hurt them too bad to admit that most people in the country don't trust them and hate their guts. Their objective was and is to delegitimize his epic upset victory at every turn.

So question to you: Are you one of the resident TDS Lefties around here not acknowledging the DOJ/FBI conspiracy against the Trump campaign and presidency? The 15+ now LEADERS of the DOJ/FBI that have been fired or forced to resign because of wrongdoing, all relating to improper steps taken during the HRC investigation and subsequent Russia hoax?

You’re triggered and spouting off FOX News headlines and talking points. Calm down. Try to create your own thought.

Clinton never had over 50% because of Perot. He probably wouldn’t have won in 1992 much less re-elected in 1996 without Perot’s historically strong third party run.

I agree, Mueller probably won’t show DIRECT participation between Trump and Russian agents to conspire. He will most likely show those acting for Trump attempting to conspire. The obstruction is hard to prove but Trump surely tried to obstruct with the Comey firing. Hard to prove though.

Alan