You don’t get to talk about role models. You don’t have a leg to stand on. You worship the most flawed human to ever run for office. Any one with sense will disagree your position.
By the way your last 10 posts say the exact same thing 10 different ways. why so repetitive? It’s boring. You have nothing to offer other than the same lame attacks.
I guess that’s why you like Trump. That’s all he ever does.
Get ready to lose. The rest of the country has grown tired of the act.
Hive mind liberal is bored by lack of variety.
That's rich.
Now it’s your turn? Let me guess - liberals are the real cult, we’re all idiots blah blah blah. Then you will ask what Trump’s crime was for the 300th time.
Good god I hope someone is paying you. Because if you are not being paid, you are a tragic human.
Tampon Tim not only lied about his military service, but looks like he lied about being a head football coach. He’s just a fraud. He served as an “assistant coach.”
I missed the days when I could have interesting conversations with Republican voters. Mitt Romney was easy to defend. There were a lot of good reasons to like Mitt Romney. Somebody who supported Mitt could make a lot of sound arguments, and we could have an adult discussion.
These days, as evidenced by this thread, forget about it. Nothing but attacks and/or trolling.
Liberal leaders and representatives are complicit with communism. The liberal voters are either desperate lower class/illegals, government paid workers or really dumb and gullible.
This post was edited 24 seconds after it was posted.
How did the Republican party go from party of General Dwight Eisenhower to party of Captain bone spurs Trump the draft Dodger? Make that make sense.
Terrible policies, scapegoating and blind hatred for libs. Oh and FOX.
Oh hatred is the wrong word for all libs. Absolute hatred for anyone who believes my kids should lay their lives on the line for foreign wars, when they themselves wouldn’t dream of taking up arms. That is a red line. Otherwise, they just peddle nonsense.
I was reading that libs were a hippie anti war peace movement in the 60’s. So, not sure where you believe you are a lib?
Tampon Tim not only lied about his military service, but looks like he lied about being a head football coach. He’s just a fraud. He served as an “assistant coach.”
No coincidence that she picked Walz. He let the cities burn while she got the people out of jail responsible for it. Imagine what they would let America turn into.
I missed the days when I could have interesting conversations with Republican voters. Mitt Romney was easy to defend. There were a lot of good reasons to like Mitt Romney. Somebody who supported Mitt could make a lot of sound arguments, and we could have an adult discussion.
These days, as evidenced by this thread, forget about it. Nothing but attacks and/or trolling.
I kinda feel bad for actual conservatives. Their party has been taken over by a group that stands for nothing. Own the libs isn’t an actual policy.
I can’t wait for Trump and Trumpism to be replaced by normalcy.
Terrible policies, scapegoating and blind hatred for libs. Oh and FOX.
Oh hatred is the wrong word for all libs. Absolute hatred for anyone who believes my kids should lay their lives on the line for foreign wars, when they themselves wouldn’t dream of taking up arms. That is a red line. Otherwise, they just peddle nonsense.
I was reading that libs were a hippie anti war peace movement in the 60’s. So, not sure where you believe you are a lib?
Please recycle the selective service rant, again. Play all your hits. why not
No coincidence that she picked Walz. He let the cities burn while she got the people out of jail responsible for it. Imagine what they would let America turn into.
All the trolls working the morning shift today. what no picture of a burning car to accompany your statement. You are slipping. I’m pretty sure the burning car was in there the other 75 times you posted this.
You guys need to ask your manager for new material. Tell them the libs are bored. 😴
I missed the days when I could have interesting conversations with Republican voters. Mitt Romney was easy to defend. There were a lot of good reasons to like Mitt Romney. Somebody who supported Mitt could make a lot of sound arguments, and we could have an adult discussion.
These days, as evidenced by this thread, forget about it. Nothing but attacks and/or trolling.
Funny how Dems painted Romney as the Devil when he was running against Obama. Now they love him.
I missed the days when I could have interesting conversations with Republican voters. Mitt Romney was easy to defend. There were a lot of good reasons to like Mitt Romney. Somebody who supported Mitt could make a lot of sound arguments, and we could have an adult discussion.
These days, as evidenced by this thread, forget about it. Nothing but attacks and/or trolling.
Funny how Dems painted Romney as the Devil when he was running against Obama. Now they love him.
Revisionist history. Nobody painted Romney as the devil. The name calling was ushered in with Trump.
Libs - question for you ... Do you respect the laws of the land or should you be able to ignore the ones you don't like? Because your VP cand. has talked enthusiastically about aiding and abetting criminals. You okay with that?
Would you be referring to the laws that Trump was found guilty of breaking? Should we be ignoring those?
Funny how Dems painted Romney as the Devil when he was running against Obama. Now they love him.
Revisionist history. Nobody painted Romney as the devil. The name calling was ushered in with Trump.
Pooch - you just lie and lie, take a breather, and then lie some more? The Dems in 2012 savagely went after Romney with lies.
From the LA Times - one of the most liberal news sources: The LA Times even said Romney is owed an apology but no way in hell Harry Reid is giving one.
“Romney didn’t win, did he?” That was former Senate Democratic majority leader Harry Reid’s response to whether he regretted lying about then-GOP presidential nominee — and now Utah senator — Mitt Romney. Reid accused Romney on the Senate floor in 2012, when he was running for president, of not having paid any taxes in four years. It was absolutely untrue and was discredited by Washington Post fact-checkers and others at the time. But that didn’t stop the onslaught of unfair and inaccurate accusations and innuendos.
The Mitt Romney who ran for president in 2012 went on to vote for conviction in President Trump’s impeachment trial. And that same Romney became the first known Republican senator to march with the George Floyd protesters over the weekend. You remember 2012, right? That was the year of the last presidential election before Donald Trump’s victory. And the way liberals attacked Romney’s presidential campaign on opinion pages of newspapers, news broadcasts and in the media echo chamber of blue check-mark Twitter, has a lot to do with how the next election went — and how this one will go. Their treatment of Romney was an inflection point for many on the right. A recent fundraising email from the Trump campaign begins: “President Trump isn’t running against Sleepy Joe Biden. He’s running against the Radical Left, the Deep State, the Do-Nothing Democrats, and their partner, the real opposition party, the Fake News media.” Trump didn’t invent the idea of the media as “the real opposition party.” In the modern era the tactic dates to Richard Nixon. It was Nixon’s VP Spiro Agnew — with the help of speechwriters Patrick Buchanan and William Safire — who launched a war against the media as a “tiny and closed fraternity of privileged men, elected by no one.” Advertisement In 1988, George H.W. Bush goosed his shot at the nomination by aggressively pushing back against CBS’ Dan Rather in an interview. In 1992 his campaign sold bumper stickers, “Annoy the Liberal Media, Reelect Bush.” Rather’s failed attempt to destroy his son’s reelection in September of 2004 by using forged documents only confirmed conservative hatred of the media in general and Rather in particular. You could see conservative hatred of media reaching critical mass when Newt Gingrich turned nearly every debate question into an attack on the media as an elitist, partisan, fifth column determined to do the Democrats work for them, and the base loved him for it. But it was the understandable perception of conservatives that the press treated Romney unfairly that caused many on the right to openly declare war on the media, because they believed that the press had already declared war on them. What you see is what you get with Romney, if you don’t have partisan blinders on. He’s a transparently decent man who is also a transparently conventional, if a bit stiff, Republican politician. He’s not immune to the charge of flip-flopping on issues like abortion or healthcare, but that hardly makes him unique. What he isn’t — and wasn’t in 2012 — is a racist, a sexist or a cold-hearted monster. And yet, that is how he was routinely depicted by his opponents, including commentators across the mainstream media, with precious little pushback from mainstream reporters. Advertisement Put aside for a moment that New York Times columnist Gail Collins mentioned a trivial incident with Romney’s dog in more than 70 columns to make him sound like an abuser of animals (ignoring the equally trivial fact that Barack Obama ate dog while living in Indonesia as a child). Recall instead the time when Romney explained how, when he was elected governor of Massachusetts, he bent over backward to work with women’s groups to get names of qualified women to staff his administration. He said he got so many recommendations — which he used! — that he needed binders to hold all the resumes. In other words, a Republican governor did exactly what feminist groups want elected officials to do, but the internet exploded with condemnation and liberal commentators reacted to his phrase “binders full of women” like he was a character from “A Handmaid’s Tale.” Then Daily Beast columnist Michael Tomasky called Romney a “race-mongering pyromaniac.” Why? Because he referred to Obamacare as — wait for it — “Obamacare” in a speech to the NAACP. The lesson many on the right took from all the Romney attacks was that a candidate can’t win by being decent. “At least he fights” became a kind of unofficial mantra of the Trump brigades. Now, Trump the Fighter vs. The Fake News is the defining issue for many on the right, as Reid’s once-damnable cynicism has become a Republican virtue. Now it is the right that attacks Romney’s character while the left has a strange new respect for it, not because his character has changed, but because it hasn’t.
Then Daily Beast columnist Michael Tomasky called Romney a “race-mongering pyromaniac.” Why? Because he referred to Obamacare as — wait for it — “Obamacare” in a speech to the NAACP.