That's another answer to a "question" that *trump2028 asked a few days ago about why Trump's lawyers can't draft their Complaint in the style that Trump speaks (rambling, ungrammatical, disconnected, vague, jumbled, redundant, raging). It doesn't meet Rule 8 pleading requirements (which have been around since at least the 1950s).
Here's the Order, which is interesting and funny ("A complaint is not a megaphone for public relations or a podium for a passionate oration at a political rally or the functional equivalent of the Hyde Park Speakers’ Corner.")
Back to the drawing board for Paltzik, Brito and Epstein ("leave to amend within twenty-eight days"). They probably knew this was coming, but were too scared to push back on whoever at the White House (Bondi? Blanche?) is handling this ridiculous lawsuit for Trump.
He was told to trim it down to 40 pages.
Yes, told to get down to 40 pages. Also told to refrain from superfluous allegations like "The Apprentice’ represented the cultural magnitude of President Trump’s singular brilliance, which captured the [Z]eitgeist of our time” which even a DEI law school student would know does not belong in a federal Complaint. That will be the hard part in revising this because Trump will spazz out and scream "lawfare!" when his lawyers tell him that he can't include MAGA marketing material in a Complaint.
If they see a post they dont agree with they will report it.
And yet reporting a post is not the same as getting its author banned, is it?
I'm willing to stipulate that some lib regulars may have reported posts of yours. (I haven't had to; I just use the Block function.) But the management of this board cannot reasonably be characterized as lib. I only know some of them personally, but those are people who carry a lot of weight on how the board is managed, and not people who'd be likely to ban a poster simply because some lib clutched his pearls over the author's post(s). With this management team, there has to be more to a banning than that.
To repeat: Readers may report posts. It's a long, long step from that to LRC management's banning the author of those posts.
I am pleased to host President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, of Turkey, at the White House on September 25th. We are working on many Trade and Military Deals with the President, including the large scale purchase of Boeing aircraft, a major F-16 Deal, and a continuation of the F-35 talks, which we expect to conclude positively. President Erdoğan and I have always had a very good relationship. I look forward to seeing him on the 25th!
Maybe Trump could sell him that Boeing plane he got for free.
The Trump parade of dictator visitors continues. Of course Trump has a great relationship with Erdogan. He has undermined democracy in his country, arrested opposition party officials on made up charges, suppressed free speech and had government take control of media outlets, and undermined judicial independence. All the things Trump is trying to do. This will be more of a "how to" meeting than anything else.
Yes, told to get down to 40 pages. Also told to refrain from superfluous allegations like "The Apprentice’ represented the cultural magnitude of President Trump’s singular brilliance, which captured the [Z]eitgeist of our time” which even a DEI law school student would know does not belong in a federal Complaint. That will be the hard part in revising this because Trump will spazz out and scream "lawfare!" when his lawyers tell him that he can't include MAGA marketing material in a Complaint.
...Except that they already did include "MAGA marketing material" in the initial version of the complaint--the version that people are most likely to remember. "Lawfare," indeed, but not in the direction that President Trump might think.
If they see a post they dont agree with they will report it.
And yet reporting a post is not the same as getting its author banned, is it?
I'm willing to stipulate that some lib regulars may have reported posts of yours. (I haven't had to; I just use the Block function.) But the management of this board cannot reasonably be characterized as lib. I only know some of them personally, but those are people who carry a lot of weight on how the board is managed, and not people who'd be likely to ban a poster simply because some lib clutched his pearls over the author's post(s). With this management team, there has to be more to a banning than that.
To repeat: Readers may report posts. It's a long, long step from that to LRC management's banning the author of those posts.
Liberal logic... lol.
If you mass report posts purely because you don't like the opinions expressed you are actively trying to get the poster banned.
If you block a poster because you dont like the opinions expressed you are a child.
You live in a silo of stupidity.
This post was edited 2 minutes after it was posted.
No rational human being could believe E Jean Carroll's story. Not one.
So Trump's expert legal team couldn't find a single non-leftist? Why does he surround himself with idiots? Is it because they were MAGA lawyers or because he's a idiot?
No rational human being believes that Trump is not a serial rapist. Not one.
In NYC? In an environment where leftists will actively attempt to destroy your life if they dont get their way?
LOL
Youre so DUMB.
Democrats are loathed by most Americans and you idiots are doubling down on being insufferable.
Those were Trump's documents. He had every right to possess them
Those are not Trump's documents. They are US classified documents belonging to the US. Trump had no right to possess them. There is no conceivable world in which documents that the US Intelligence Community (IC) and the Pentagon have labeled and classified as Top Secret belong to a civilian to keep in his bathroom.
Trump admitted they were Top Secret documents that he had no right to possess when he submitted a FALSE affidavit to federal law enforcement claiming he had returned all documents he was in illegal possession of.
Trump had no right to intentionally and willfully possess Top Secret classified documents after he left office, or to store said documents in his bathroom next to his toilet (commode).
Biden had similar boxes which he at no point was authorized to possess. He literally stole 100% of them. He then left many of them in the care of a literal crack addict whose sole source of income was selling Joe Biden. And you didn't give a damn. The TDS has destroyed your tiny mind.
I did give a damn. More importantly, the FBI and DOJ gave a damn. I watched as they investigated that matter and concluded that no criminal charges were warranted.
The differences between Trump's illegal retention of classified documents and the Biden matter (or Pence or anyone else) are enormous and include at least (1) the magnitude, both quantitative and qualitative, of the classified documents that Trump stole and illegally possessed, (2) Trump's willful intent to steal and illegally possess such a large cache/tranche of classified documents, (3) Trump's FALSE affidavits and lies to federal law enforcement about the classified documents, (4) Trump's efforts to destroy evidence of his FURTHER attempts to conceal and illegally retain classified documents under subpoena, and (5) Trump's attempts to conspire with his lawyers to lie about the scope of the documents and to conspire with the little sh!tster and hide the documents in his bathroom next to his personal toilet.
-----------------------------------
We've been over all this multiple times in many other threads. All your lies have been debunked, and your fake and bogus arguments addressed and highlighted for you. You never respond to any of that, rather you just disappear and then come back weeks/months later and repeat the debunked lies and failed arguments you started with. It's fvcking weirdo behavior. That said, I appreciate the opportunity to humiliate and b!tchslap you again. Keep posting, Russia boy.
Trump was the POTUS. The arbiter of what is or isnt classified.
Biden wasn't cleared of wrongdoing he was declared brain dead and prosecution wasn't recommended because he was a stupid old fool a jury would feel sorry for.
Stop lying.
This post was edited 3 minutes after it was posted.
Yes, told to get down to 40 pages. Also told to refrain from superfluous allegations like "The Apprentice’ represented the cultural magnitude of President Trump’s singular brilliance, which captured the [Z]eitgeist of our time” which even a DEI law school student would know does not belong in a federal Complaint. That will be the hard part in revising this because Trump will spazz out and scream "lawfare!" when his lawyers tell him that he can't include MAGA marketing material in a Complaint.
...Except that they already did include "MAGA marketing material" in the initial version of the complaint--the version that people are most likely to remember. "Lawfare," indeed, but not in the direction that President Trump might think.
I don’t know. Even though da Judge is taking fault with just about everything procedural in the legal filing, I think the merits of Trumps suit are rock solid and rest on long standing legal precedent for defamation.
The Merits..
I won biggly and I am a super cool guy, many people say the coolest ever, so nobody can write bad stuff about me.
I have never reported A-Dolt- or his alter ego Late night Eddy..(or anyone else)
I think many of his fellow Trumpers can’t stomach him and they report him.
I am proud of you, Oldrunningguy. I have never and WILL NEVER report anyone. Do you have a nickname we can call you because typing out Oldrunningguy takes a while. LOL.
I had a post removed for being “discriminatory” for referring to a trans athlete as a man pretending to be a woman.
Like Sally (your altered ego) you are a guy using a female name. Look in the mirror to see someone who is pretending to be a woman. If, you're in transition, the sooner you have it snipped off, the better for you.
Those are not Trump's documents. They are US classified documents belonging to the US. Trump had no right to possess them. There is no conceivable world in which documents that the US Intelligence Community (IC) and the Pentagon have labeled and classified as Top Secret belong to a civilian to keep in his bathroom.
Trump admitted they were Top Secret documents that he had no right to possess when he submitted a FALSE affidavit to federal law enforcement claiming he had returned all documents he was in illegal possession of.
Trump had no right to intentionally and willfully possess Top Secret classified documents after he left office, or to store said documents in his bathroom next to his toilet (commode).
I did give a damn. More importantly, the FBI and DOJ gave a damn. I watched as they investigated that matter and concluded that no criminal charges were warranted.
The differences between Trump's illegal retention of classified documents and the Biden matter (or Pence or anyone else) are enormous and include at least (1) the magnitude, both quantitative and qualitative, of the classified documents that Trump stole and illegally possessed, (2) Trump's willful intent to steal and illegally possess such a large cache/tranche of classified documents, (3) Trump's FALSE affidavits and lies to federal law enforcement about the classified documents, (4) Trump's efforts to destroy evidence of his FURTHER attempts to conceal and illegally retain classified documents under subpoena, and (5) Trump's attempts to conspire with his lawyers to lie about the scope of the documents and to conspire with the little sh!tster and hide the documents in his bathroom next to his personal toilet.
-----------------------------------
We've been over all this multiple times in many other threads. All your lies have been debunked, and your fake and bogus arguments addressed and highlighted for you. You never respond to any of that, rather you just disappear and then come back weeks/months later and repeat the debunked lies and failed arguments you started with. It's fvcking weirdo behavior. That said, I appreciate the opportunity to humiliate and b!tchslap you again. Keep posting, Russia boy.
Trump was the POTUS. The arbiter of what is or isnt classified.
Non-responsive. You're deflecting and going off on tangents from your original bogus arguments and lies. That's known as retreating and tacitly admitting defeat.
No one disputes that the President has ultimate authority on what is classified, on the rare (nonexistent?) occasions when the issue presents itself to a President. Similarly, no one disputes that a civilian hanging out in his bathroom has no right to possess, retain, or store classified documents, nor does the bathroom civilian have any right to lie about doing so or to destroy evidence of those illegal actions.
Biden wasn't cleared of wrongdoing he was declared brain dead and prosecution wasn't recommended because he was a stupid old fool a jury would feel sorry for.
Also, non-responsive.
Biden was not prosecuted for the reasons set forth in the "Hur Report" and summarized in pages 2-24. Those do NOT include that "he was a stupid old fool a jury would feel sorry for" which was only mentioned at page 218 of the Hur Report under a section titled "other reasons."
To correct you and debunk you, yet again: The differences between Trump's illegal retention of classified documents and the Biden matter (or Pence or anyone else) are enormous and include at least (1) the magnitude, both quantitative and qualitative, of the classified documents that Trump stole and illegally possessed, (2) Trump's willful intent to steal and illegally possess such a large cache/tranche of classified documents, (3) Trump's FALSE affidavits and lies to federal law enforcement about the classified documents, (4) Trump's efforts to destroy evidence of his FURTHER attempts to conceal and illegally retain classified documents under subpoena, and (5) Trump's attempts to conspire with his lawyers to lie about the scope of the documents and to conspire with the little sh!tster and hide the documents in his bathroom next to his personal toilet.
Whatabboudyou is never a good argument, and you've proven it's a terrible argument in this Trump Bathroom situation. Totally fvcking irrelevant under bedrock bathroom law. You suck at this under all ten of your thread names, Russia boy.
I have never reported A-Dolt- or his alter ego Late night Eddy..(or anyone else)
I think many of his fellow Trumpers can’t stomach him and they report him.
I am proud of you, Oldrunningguy. I have never and WILL NEVER report anyone. Do you have a nickname we can call you because typing out Oldrunningguy takes a while. LOL.
Serious qestion for Trump supporters. You seem to believe in free speech and I agree with that. How do you view Trump regularly calling freedom of press/speech "the enemy of the people", telling reporters they are nasty or other insults, and not only threatening prosecution, but actively filing lawsuits and pressuring media companies to fire individuals who question him?
“If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all.” Noam Chomsky
Trump was the POTUS. The arbiter of what is or isnt classified.
Non-responsive. You're deflecting and going off on tangents from your original bogus arguments and lies. That's known as retreating and tacitly admitting defeat.
No one disputes that the President has ultimate authority on what is classified, on the rare (nonexistent?) occasions when the issue presents itself to a President. Similarly, no one disputes that a civilian hanging out in his bathroom has no right to possess, retain, or store classified documents, nor does the bathroom civilian have any right to lie about doing so or to destroy evidence of those illegal actions.
Biden wasn't cleared of wrongdoing he was declared brain dead and prosecution wasn't recommended because he was a stupid old fool a jury would feel sorry for.
Also, non-responsive.
Biden was not prosecuted for the reasons set forth in the "Hur Report" and summarized in pages 2-24. Those do NOT include that "he was a stupid old fool a jury would feel sorry for" which was only mentioned at page 218 of the Hur Report under a section titled "other reasons."
To correct you and debunk you, yet again: The differences between Trump's illegal retention of classified documents and the Biden matter (or Pence or anyone else) are enormous and include at least (1) the magnitude, both quantitative and qualitative, of the classified documents that Trump stole and illegally possessed, (2) Trump's willful intent to steal and illegally possess such a large cache/tranche of classified documents, (3) Trump's FALSE affidavits and lies to federal law enforcement about the classified documents, (4) Trump's efforts to destroy evidence of his FURTHER attempts to conceal and illegally retain classified documents under subpoena, and (5) Trump's attempts to conspire with his lawyers to lie about the scope of the documents and to conspire with the little sh!tster and hide the documents in his bathroom next to his personal toilet.
Whatabboudyou is never a good argument, and you've proven it's a terrible argument in this Trump Bathroom situation. Totally fvcking irrelevant under bedrock bathroom law. You suck at this under all ten of your thread names, Russia boy.
Biden and Pence both stole documents they never at any point had authorization to possess.
Trump being POTUS had authorization to possess the documents he had.
Hur based his decision on the likelihood of winning the case. He knew a liberal jury would never convict a brain dead old fool they aligned with politically and felt sorry for. The notion that Biden didnt do anything meriting prosecution is idiotic. He is on tape admitting to his ghost wroter that he was relaying stolen classified material FOR PROFIT ffs...
The bathroom at Mar a lago is much more secure than the garage of a house you share with a literal crack addict whose sole source of income is selling Joe Biden.
I am proud of you, Oldrunningguy. I have never and WILL NEVER report anyone. Do you have a nickname we can call you because typing out Oldrunningguy takes a while. LOL.
Serious qestion for Trump supporters. You seem to believe in free speech and I agree with that. How do you view Trump regularly calling freedom of press/speech "the enemy of the people", telling reporters they are nasty or other insults, and not only threatening prosecution, but actively filing lawsuits and pressuring media companies to fire individuals who question him?
“If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all.” Noam Chomsky
A press that lies and works exclusively for one political while lying about being objective is literally the enemy of the people.
Propaganda isnt a free press its an arm of the government.
And Democrats actively tried to get Fox, OAN and other conservatives networks banned from the air for "misinformation" for saying things they didnt like.
Show me any issue the left is pretending to be outraged about and I'll show you an issue the left is being hypocritical about.
No Eddy , the courts found FOX guilty of Misinformation ! $780 million worth !!
No they didn't they settled to avoid trial.
If Dominion and the Biden administration had an actual case they would have went to trial and got the $1.6 billion they were suing for plus Fox to spend millions more in legal fees.
Like Sally (your altered ego) you are a guy using a female name. Look in the mirror to see someone who is pretending to be a woman. If, you're in transition, the sooner you have it snipped off, the better for you.
There was something about plagiarism so I picked the name of a DEI hire and plagiarist.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.