Im always looking for creative ways to make money and game the markets
If Trump can indeed reduce drug prices by 1,000 percent, does that not present an investment opportunity where we would actually be paid handsomely to buy drugs?
My accountant and I are running the numbers and it looks good. Like I said, don’t spread this one.
Donald J. Trump’s legal mind vs a Judge Trump: “I am getting amazing feedback on my Lawsuit against The New York Times. The predominant feeling and sentiment is, "IT'S ABOUT TIME!" The case was filed in the Great State of Florida! The Radical Left Media is working hard to destroy the U.S.A. We are going to stop them at each and every level!!! President DJT
Federal Judge in Florida “The complaint is decidedly improper and impermissible.”
(Bloomberg) -- A federal judge in Florida has tossed out President Donald Trump’s $15 billion defamation lawsuit against the New York Times days after it was filed, finding the president’s lawyers failed to follow court rules requiring “short, plain, direct” claims.
That's another answer to a "question" that *trump2028 asked a few days ago about why Trump's lawyers can't draft their Complaint in the style that Trump speaks (rambling, ungrammatical, disconnected, vague, jumbled, redundant, raging). It doesn't meet Rule 8 pleading requirements (which have been around since at least the 1950s).
Here's the Order, which is interesting and funny ("A complaint is not a megaphone for public relations or a podium for a passionate oration at a political rally or the functional equivalent of the Hyde Park Speakers’ Corner.")
Back to the drawing board for Paltzik, Brito and Epstein ("leave to amend within twenty-eight days"). They probably knew this was coming, but were too scared to push back on whoever at the White House (Bondi? Blanche?) is handling this ridiculous lawsuit for Trump.
Donald J. Trump’s legal mind vs a Judge Trump: “I am getting amazing feedback on my Lawsuit against The New York Times. The predominant feeling and sentiment is, "IT'S ABOUT TIME!" The case was filed in the Great State of Florida! The Radical Left Media is working hard to destroy the U.S.A. We are going to stop them at each and every level!!! President DJT
Federal Judge in Florida “The complaint is decidedly improper and impermissible.”
U.S. District Judge Steven Merryday on Friday struck the complaint and gave the president's lawyers 28 days to refile their lawsuit.
This is something only the dumbest people in society deny.
By a room full of leftists.
No rational human being could believe E Jean Carroll's story. Not one.
So Trump's expert legal team couldn't find a single non-leftist? Why does he surround himself with idiots? Is it because they were MAGA lawyers or because he's a idiot?
No rational human being believes that Trump is not a serial rapist. Not one.
(Bloomberg) -- A federal judge in Florida has tossed out President Donald Trump’s $15 billion defamation lawsuit against the New York Times days after it was filed, finding the president’s lawyers failed to follow court rules requiring “short, plain, direct” claims.
That's another answer to a "question" that *trump2028 asked a few days ago about why Trump's lawyers can't draft their Complaint in the style that Trump speaks (rambling, ungrammatical, disconnected, vague, jumbled, redundant, raging). It doesn't meet Rule 8 pleading requirements (which have been around since at least the 1950s).
Here's the Order, which is interesting and funny ("A complaint is not a megaphone for public relations or a podium for a passionate oration at a political rally or the functional equivalent of the Hyde Park Speakers’ Corner.")
Back to the drawing board for Paltzik, Brito and Epstein ("leave to amend within twenty-eight days"). They probably knew this was coming, but were too scared to push back on whoever at the White House (Bondi? Blanche?) is handling this ridiculous lawsuit for Trump.
The crack legal eagles surrounding Trump don’t seem concerned about court sanctions like normal lawyers would.
Going forward I look for Trump to use his legal team and the courts as a new propaganda channel based on the principle of.. everyone remembers the lie (the lawsuit) that went viral and nobody cares about the correction (judicial rejection). .
Those were Trump's documents. He had every right to possess them
Those are not Trump's documents. They are US classified documents belonging to the US. Trump had no right to possess them. There is no conceivable world in which documents that the US Intelligence Community (IC) and the Pentagon have labeled and classified as Top Secret belong to a civilian to keep in his bathroom.
Trump admitted they were Top Secret documents that he had no right to possess when he submitted a FALSE affidavit to federal law enforcement claiming he had returned all documents he was in illegal possession of.
Trump had no right to intentionally and willfully possess Top Secret classified documents after he left office, or to store said documents in his bathroom next to his toilet (commode).
Biden had similar boxes which he at no point was authorized to possess. He literally stole 100% of them. He then left many of them in the care of a literal crack addict whose sole source of income was selling Joe Biden. And you didn't give a damn. The TDS has destroyed your tiny mind.
I did give a damn. More importantly, the FBI and DOJ gave a damn. I watched as they investigated that matter and concluded that no criminal charges were warranted.
The differences between Trump's illegal retention of classified documents and the Biden matter (or Pence or anyone else) are enormous and include at least (1) the magnitude, both quantitative and qualitative, of the classified documents that Trump stole and illegally possessed, (2) Trump's willful intent to steal and illegally possess such a large cache/tranche of classified documents, (3) Trump's FALSE affidavits and lies to federal law enforcement about the classified documents, (4) Trump's efforts to destroy evidence of his FURTHER attempts to conceal and illegally retain classified documents under subpoena, and (5) Trump's attempts to conspire with his lawyers to lie about the scope of the documents and to conspire with the little sh!tster and hide the documents in his bathroom next to his personal toilet.
-----------------------------------
We've been over all this multiple times in many other threads. All your lies have been debunked, and your fake and bogus arguments addressed and highlighted for you. You never respond to any of that, rather you just disappear and then come back weeks/months later and repeat the debunked lies and failed arguments you started with. It's fvcking weirdo behavior. That said, I appreciate the opportunity to humiliate and b!tchslap you again. Keep posting, Russia boy.
Those were Trump's documents. He had every right to possess them
Those are not Trump's documents. They are US classified documents belonging to the US. Trump had no right to possess them. There is no conceivable world in which documents that the US Intelligence Community (IC) and the Pentagon have labeled and classified as Top Secret belong to a civilian to keep in his bathroom.
Trump admitted they were Top Secret documents that he had no right to possess when he submitted a FALSE affidavit to federal law enforcement claiming he had returned all documents he was in illegal possession of.
Trump had no right to intentionally and willfully possess Top Secret classified documents after he left office, or to store said documents in his bathroom next to his toilet (commode).
Biden had similar boxes which he at no point was authorized to possess. He literally stole 100% of them. He then left many of them in the care of a literal crack addict whose sole source of income was selling Joe Biden. And you didn't give a damn. The TDS has destroyed your tiny mind.
I did give a damn. More importantly, the FBI and DOJ gave a damn. I watched as they investigated that matter and concluded that no criminal charges were warranted.
The differences between Trump's illegal retention of classified documents and the Biden matter (or Pence or anyone else) are enormous and include at least (1) the magnitude, both quantitative and qualitative, of the classified documents that Trump stole and illegally possessed, (2) Trump's willful intent to steal and illegally possess such a large cache/tranche of classified documents, (3) Trump's FALSE affidavits and lies to federal law enforcement about the classified documents, (4) Trump's efforts to destroy evidence of his FURTHER attempts to conceal and illegally retain classified documents under subpoena, and (5) Trump's attempts to conspire with his lawyers to lie about the scope of the documents and to conspire with the little sh!tster and hide the documents in his bathroom next to his personal toilet.
-----------------------------------
We've been over all this multiple times in many other threads. All your lies have been debunked, and your fake and bogus arguments addressed and highlighted for you. You never respond to any of that, rather you just disappear and then come back weeks/months later and repeat the debunked lies and failed arguments you started with. It's fvcking weirdo behavior. That said, I appreciate the opportunity to humiliate and b!tchslap you again. Keep posting, Russia boy.
But some dumb f*ck racist named Charlie Kirk told be that Trump declassified them just by thinking about it. Are you saying Charlie lied?
Those are not Trump's documents. They are US classified documents belonging to the US. Trump had no right to possess them. There is no conceivable world in which documents that the US Intelligence Community (IC) and the Pentagon have labeled and classified as Top Secret belong to a civilian to keep in his bathroom.
Trump admitted they were Top Secret documents that he had no right to possess when he submitted a FALSE affidavit to federal law enforcement claiming he had returned all documents he was in illegal possession of.
Trump had no right to intentionally and willfully possess Top Secret classified documents after he left office, or to store said documents in his bathroom next to his toilet (commode).
I did give a damn. More importantly, the FBI and DOJ gave a damn. I watched as they investigated that matter and concluded that no criminal charges were warranted.
The differences between Trump's illegal retention of classified documents and the Biden matter (or Pence or anyone else) are enormous and include at least (1) the magnitude, both quantitative and qualitative, of the classified documents that Trump stole and illegally possessed, (2) Trump's willful intent to steal and illegally possess such a large cache/tranche of classified documents, (3) Trump's FALSE affidavits and lies to federal law enforcement about the classified documents, (4) Trump's efforts to destroy evidence of his FURTHER attempts to conceal and illegally retain classified documents under subpoena, and (5) Trump's attempts to conspire with his lawyers to lie about the scope of the documents and to conspire with the little sh!tster and hide the documents in his bathroom next to his personal toilet.
-----------------------------------
We've been over all this multiple times in many other threads. All your lies have been debunked, and your fake and bogus arguments addressed and highlighted for you. You never respond to any of that, rather you just disappear and then come back weeks/months later and repeat the debunked lies and failed arguments you started with. It's fvcking weirdo behavior. That said, I appreciate the opportunity to humiliate and b!tchslap you again. Keep posting, Russia boy.
But some dumb f*ck racist named Charlie Kirk told be that Trump declassified them just by thinking about it. Are you saying Charlie lied?
I see what you did there. You're trying to get the FCC after me. Nice try, muffster.
AdultintheRoom was actually the dumbfvck that said Trump mentally declassified the Top Secret documents on his way out of the White House door, not Charles Kirk. And yes, AdultintheRoom was lying at the time, as there is no way, unless he's the Amazing goddam Kreskin, that he would know if Trump mentally and silently performed such a massively unlikely, idiotic, and IC sabotaging act. AdultintheRoom was lying, as he often does. As all Protestants here know, lying is a sin against Jesus Christ Himself.
then what was it? If your posts got reported, surely there was something in them that warranted getting banned or else you would not have been?
Do you live under a rock?
Liberals cannot tolerate being disagreed with.
If they see a post they dont agree with they will report it.
Theres a reason the left riots whenever conservative speakers show up on college campuses.
Theres a reason Democrat NGOs are doxxing high school students for forming TPUSA clubs.
Liberals are intolerant and mentally ill.
Hey adolt, that's a lot of meaningless words that I didn't read, but I just wanted to remind you that I'm a combat veteran, you're probably not even a veteran.
Now, I'll let you get back to this board and the world hating you more than just about anyone else they know.
(Bloomberg) -- A federal judge in Florida has tossed out President Donald Trump’s $15 billion defamation lawsuit against the New York Times days after it was filed, finding the president’s lawyers failed to follow court rules requiring “short, plain, direct” claims.
That's another answer to a "question" that *trump2028 asked a few days ago about why Trump's lawyers can't draft their Complaint in the style that Trump speaks (rambling, ungrammatical, disconnected, vague, jumbled, redundant, raging). It doesn't meet Rule 8 pleading requirements (which have been around since at least the 1950s).
Here's the Order, which is interesting and funny ("A complaint is not a megaphone for public relations or a podium for a passionate oration at a political rally or the functional equivalent of the Hyde Park Speakers’ Corner.")
Back to the drawing board for Paltzik, Brito and Epstein ("leave to amend within twenty-eight days"). They probably knew this was coming, but were too scared to push back on whoever at the White House (Bondi? Blanche?) is handling this ridiculous lawsuit for Trump.
At this point, bolded above is probably true about a huge proportion of things that this administration will do.
Reminding us that, "THANK GOD Trump is dumb and incompetent." (and in 2.0 will struggle to attract people who are much better than that)
That's another answer to a "question" that *trump2028 asked a few days ago about why Trump's lawyers can't draft their Complaint in the style that Trump speaks (rambling, ungrammatical, disconnected, vague, jumbled, redundant, raging). It doesn't meet Rule 8 pleading requirements (which have been around since at least the 1950s).
Here's the Order, which is interesting and funny ("A complaint is not a megaphone for public relations or a podium for a passionate oration at a political rally or the functional equivalent of the Hyde Park Speakers’ Corner.")
Back to the drawing board for Paltzik, Brito and Epstein ("leave to amend within twenty-eight days"). They probably knew this was coming, but were too scared to push back on whoever at the White House (Bondi? Blanche?) is handling this ridiculous lawsuit for Trump.
Those were Trump's documents. He had every right to possess them
Those are not Trump's documents. They are US classified documents belonging to the US. Trump had no right to possess them. There is no conceivable world in which documents that the US Intelligence Community (IC) and the Pentagon have labeled and classified as Top Secret belong to a civilian to keep in his bathroom.
Trump admitted they were Top Secret documents that he had no right to possess when he submitted a FALSE affidavit to federal law enforcement claiming he had returned all documents he was in illegal possession of.
Trump had no right to intentionally and willfully possess Top Secret classified documents after he left office, or to store said documents in his bathroom next to his toilet (commode).
Biden had similar boxes which he at no point was authorized to possess. He literally stole 100% of them. He then left many of them in the care of a literal crack addict whose sole source of income was selling Joe Biden. And you didn't give a damn. The TDS has destroyed your tiny mind.
I did give a damn. More importantly, the FBI and DOJ gave a damn. I watched as they investigated that matter and concluded that no criminal charges were warranted.
The differences between Trump's illegal retention of classified documents and the Biden matter (or Pence or anyone else) are enormous and include at least (1) the magnitude, both quantitative and qualitative, of the classified documents that Trump stole and illegally possessed, (2) Trump's willful intent to steal and illegally possess such a large cache/tranche of classified documents, (3) Trump's FALSE affidavits and lies to federal law enforcement about the classified documents, (4) Trump's efforts to destroy evidence of his FURTHER attempts to conceal and illegally retain classified documents under subpoena, and (5) Trump's attempts to conspire with his lawyers to lie about the scope of the documents and to conspire with the little sh!tster and hide the documents in his bathroom next to his personal toilet.
-----------------------------------
We've been over all this multiple times in many other threads. All your lies have been debunked, and your fake and bogus arguments addressed and highlighted for you. You never respond to any of that, rather you just disappear and then come back weeks/months later and repeat the debunked lies and failed arguments you started with. It's fvcking weirdo behavior. That said, I appreciate the opportunity to humiliate and b!tchslap you again. Keep posting, Russia boy.
Sorry, that's ALL 100% refuted by me saying, "Biden's garage," or "Hillary's server."
Those are not Trump's documents. They are US classified documents belonging to the US. Trump had no right to possess them. There is no conceivable world in which documents that the US Intelligence Community (IC) and the Pentagon have labeled and classified as Top Secret belong to a civilian to keep in his bathroom.
Trump admitted they were Top Secret documents that he had no right to possess when he submitted a FALSE affidavit to federal law enforcement claiming he had returned all documents he was in illegal possession of.
Trump had no right to intentionally and willfully possess Top Secret classified documents after he left office, or to store said documents in his bathroom next to his toilet (commode).
I did give a damn. More importantly, the FBI and DOJ gave a damn. I watched as they investigated that matter and concluded that no criminal charges were warranted.
The differences between Trump's illegal retention of classified documents and the Biden matter (or Pence or anyone else) are enormous and include at least (1) the magnitude, both quantitative and qualitative, of the classified documents that Trump stole and illegally possessed, (2) Trump's willful intent to steal and illegally possess such a large cache/tranche of classified documents, (3) Trump's FALSE affidavits and lies to federal law enforcement about the classified documents, (4) Trump's efforts to destroy evidence of his FURTHER attempts to conceal and illegally retain classified documents under subpoena, and (5) Trump's attempts to conspire with his lawyers to lie about the scope of the documents and to conspire with the little sh!tster and hide the documents in his bathroom next to his personal toilet.
-----------------------------------
We've been over all this multiple times in many other threads. All your lies have been debunked, and your fake and bogus arguments addressed and highlighted for you. You never respond to any of that, rather you just disappear and then come back weeks/months later and repeat the debunked lies and failed arguments you started with. It's fvcking weirdo behavior. That said, I appreciate the opportunity to humiliate and b!tchslap you again. Keep posting, Russia boy.
But some dumb f*ck racist named Charlie Kirk told be that Trump declassified them just by thinking about it. Are you saying Charlie lied?
Reminds me: Children and young people are our future.
And apparently, great numbers of them by the late dates of 2024 and 2025 thought that an ardent Trump supporter was worth listening to.
Perhaps the future ain't so bright.
.
Yeah, that was a dumb way to put it. OF COURSE the future ain't so bright.
That's another answer to a "question" that *trump2028 asked a few days ago about why Trump's lawyers can't draft their Complaint in the style that Trump speaks (rambling, ungrammatical, disconnected, vague, jumbled, redundant, raging). It doesn't meet Rule 8 pleading requirements (which have been around since at least the 1950s).
Here's the Order, which is interesting and funny ("A complaint is not a megaphone for public relations or a podium for a passionate oration at a political rally or the functional equivalent of the Hyde Park Speakers’ Corner.")
Back to the drawing board for Paltzik, Brito and Epstein ("leave to amend within twenty-eight days"). They probably knew this was coming, but were too scared to push back on whoever at the White House (Bondi? Blanche?) is handling this ridiculous lawsuit for Trump.
He was told to trim it down to 40 pages.
I've never read them (I just rely on the lib media), but are we to the point where Trump's lawyers suck up to him by illiterately misusing capitalization and all caps in their legal filings?
I am pleased to host President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, of Turkey, at the White House on September 25th. We are working on many Trade and Military Deals with the President, including the large scale purchase of Boeing aircraft, a major F-16 Deal, and a continuation of the F-35 talks, which we expect to conclude positively. President Erdoğan and I have always had a very good relationship. I look forward to seeing him on the 25th!
