Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Fat hurts wrote:

Ringmaster wrote:

Don't you think this information should be brought to light? What do these two men have to gain by coming forward?

I don't know, but one thing is certain.

Republicans are afraid to let the FBI sort it all out.

You don't know if information about two men coming forward and saying they were the ones, not BK, that groped Ford that night should come out?

How frickin' partisan are you?

Fat hurts wrote:

:Sigh wrote:

Looks likes Avenetti's client is not credible.

It all hinges on accuser #1's testimony.

Why do you think she's not credible?

I haven't seen any information that strongly suggests she is or is not credible.

If Democrats really cared about credibility, Hillary would let the FBI investigate. And at the very least, they would look into the death of Mary Mahoney and they other mysterious deaths...but Democrats don't care about the truth!

Democrats are scared to death of the truth.

I agree Fatty!

A very stabIe genius! wrote:

Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/07/12/trump-speaks-after-nato-summit-stable-genius-newday-vpx.cnn

Hi Flagpole! Still upset of HRC's devastating loss, eh?

Say What??!? wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

I don't know, but one thing is certain.

Republicans are afraid to let the FBI sort it all out.

You don't know if information about two men coming forward and saying they were the ones, not BK, that groped Ford that night should come out?

How frickin' partisan are you?

I was answering your second question. I don't know what these two men might have to gain by coming forward.

Again, Replubicans are afraid to let the FBI sort it all out.

Ringmaster wrote:

Awsi Dooger wrote:

Now the GOP is apparently intent to make it a circus by claiming two men have come forward separately saying they were with Mark Judge and assaulted Ford.

It wasn't Kavanaugh, it was me.

It wasn't you, it was me.

Meanwhile Mark Judge is cowering in that beach house

Don't you think this information should be brought to light? What do these two men have to gain by coming forward?

So, two men have admitted to sexually assaulting Ford and therefore it cannot be true that Ford was sexually assaulted by Kavanaugh? Okaaayyyyyyy . . .

You know, I ate pancakes for breakfast today. Therefore it cannot be true that I ate cereal for breakfast last week.

Say What??!? wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

I don't know, but one thing is certain.

Republicans are afraid to let the FBI sort it all out.

You don't know if information about two men coming forward and saying they were the ones, not BK, that groped Ford that night should come out?

How frickin' partisan are you?

Are you really that stupid? Or is this just an act that you put on for this forum?

Two men admit to sexually assaulting Ford one time. Therefore it cannot be true that Ford was assaulted by Kavanaugh one time. I just love your logic.

STSBO wrote:

Ringmaster wrote:

Don't you think this information should be brought to light? What do these two men have to gain by coming forward?

So, two men have admitted to sexually assaulting Ford and therefore it cannot be true that Ford was sexually assaulted by Kavanaugh? Okaaayyyyyyy . . .

You know, I ate pancakes for breakfast today. Therefore it cannot be true that I ate cereal for breakfast last week.

Their claim is that they were the ones at the party, moran. Go back to Waffle House.

Pancake Eater wrote:

STSBO wrote:

So, two men have admitted to sexually assaulting Ford and therefore it cannot be true that Ford was sexually assaulted by Kavanaugh? Okaaayyyyyyy . . .

You know, I ate pancakes for breakfast today. Therefore it cannot be true that I ate cereal for breakfast last week.

Their claim is that they were the ones at the party, moran. Go back to Waffle House.

Ummm . . . pretty sure that no specific date and place of the party have been established.

But they were the ones at that particular, completely undetermined party? Okkkaaaayyyyyyy . . .

My DOG! you are stupid!

“What kind of an amoral ideologue still supports a politician who has had FIVE campaign officials plead guilty to federal charges?”

Ringmaster wrote:

Awsi Dooger wrote:

Now the GOP is apparently intent to make it a circus by claiming two men have come forward separately saying they were with Mark Judge and assaulted Ford.

It wasn't Kavanaugh, it was me.

It wasn't you, it was me.

Meanwhile Mark Judge is cowering in that beach house

Don't you think this information should be brought to light? What do these two men have to gain by coming forward?

Unlike the three women who gave their real names, these fake men do not have names and the GOP took their statement. Unlike two of the women who gave their real names, the GOP refuses to hear from them. The GOP does not want to destroy the lives of these two men, and will respect their right to privacy, and will not turn them over to Maryland police. Conclusion, the two men do not exist.

:Sigh wrote:

Looks likes Avenetti's client is not credible.

It all hinges on accuser #1's testimony.

She is very credible. She is telling the truth.

It all hinges on watching Kavanaugh blatantly lie.

Trump tariffs are a bust in the Rust Belt.

Reuters/Ipsos poll (a poll that gives favor to Trump):

Support for tariffs among likely voters – people who have been identified as most likely to take part in the upcoming election – varied from 33 percent in Pennsylvania to 38 percent in Michigan. In all states, more were negative on tariffs, varying from 44 percent in Indiana to 50 percent in Wisconsin.

“Trade and tariffs aren’t this powerfully positive issue for the President and Republicans; if anything they are viewed as counterproductive to the people and places that elected Trump,” said John Austin, Michigan-based Nonresident Brookings Institute Senior Fellow, based on the survey and anecdotal evidence.

Reuters/Ipsos poll and Trump tariffs wrote:

Trump tariffs are a bust in the Rust Belt.

Reuters/Ipsos poll (a poll that gives favor to Trump):

Support for tariffs among likely voters – people who have been identified as most likely to take part in the upcoming election – varied from 33 percent in Pennsylvania to 38 percent in Michigan. In all states, more were negative on tariffs, varying from 44 percent in Indiana to 50 percent in Wisconsin.

“Trade and tariffs aren’t this powerfully positive issue for the President and Republicans; if anything they are viewed as counterproductive to the people and places that elected Trump,” said John Austin, Michigan-based Nonresident Brookings Institute Senior Fellow, based on the survey and anecdotal evidence.

Stick a fork in Kav. Ford came across as extremely credible. The details provided and level of transparency without much hesitation we’re pretty convincing. There should be a proper and official FBI investigation regarding this particular case. The reasons why it wasn’t done yet or whatever anyone thinks about her motives for finally speaking out is all irrelevant at the moment - she showed up and is telling her story and it’s credible.

Grassley is coming across as a total insensitive blowhard. This nomination is in peril.

I agree that Ford is extremely credible.

Flagpole wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

Stick a fork in Kav. Ford came across as extremely credible. The details provided and level of transparency without much hesitation we’re pretty convincing. There should be a proper and official FBI investigation regarding this particular case. The reasons why it wasn’t done yet or whatever anyone thinks about her motives for finally speaking out is all irrelevant at the moment - she showed up and is telling her story and it’s credible.

Grassley is coming across as a total insensitive blowhard. This nomination is in peril.

I agree that Ford is extremely credible.

Grassley is getting his $hit beat in, Graham tried to step in and help him out. Repubs coming across as not very accommodating in the earlier stages of the hearing. We already knew that was the case.

Flagpole wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

Stick a fork in Kav. Ford came across as extremely credible. The details provided and level of transparency without much hesitation we’re pretty convincing. There should be a proper and official FBI investigation regarding this particular case. The reasons why it wasn’t done yet or whatever anyone thinks about her motives for finally speaking out is all irrelevant at the moment - she showed up and is telling her story and it’s credible.

Grassley is coming across as a total insensitive blowhard. This nomination is in peril.

I agree that Ford is extremely credible.

The new topic for the next year is:

When will Trump resign the thankless job of president because as a lame duck he can't get anything done his way?

Lame Duck Trump wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

I agree that Ford is extremely credible.

The new topic for the next year is:

When will Trump resign the thankless job of president because as a lame duck he can't get anything done his way?

He will resign because he will be told that the Senate has the votes to convict him after the House has impeached him, though it is possible he will hang on and actually let the Senate remove him from office.

Flagpole wrote:

Lame Duck Trump wrote:

The new topic for the next year is:

When will Trump resign the thankless job of president because as a lame duck he can't get anything done his way?

He will resign because he will be told that the Senate has the votes to convict him after the House has impeached him, though it is possible he will hang on and actually let the Senate remove him from office.

One of the senators mentioned the decision to approve a thorough FBI investigation on this matter sits with Trump. I wasn’t aware of that - this hurts him directly.

Flagpole wrote:

Lame Duck Trump wrote:

The new topic for the next year is:

When will Trump resign the thankless job of president because as a lame duck he can't get anything done his way?

He will resign because he will be told that the Senate has the votes to convict him after the House has impeached him, though it is possible he will hang on and actually let the Senate remove him from office.

Is that your final answer.