Flagpole wrote:
Anyone want to tell me now that I'm wrong that Kavanaugh won't be confirmed?
Just to be clear, I said this as soon as Avanetti announced he had someone who would make accusations...this was back on Sunday, and I will say it again...Kavanaugh will NOT be confirmed.
I’m not convinced yet. I was hoping Avanetti’s client would do a big interview, but doesn’t look like it’s happening. I think the GOP will ram this through. Tomorrow’s testimony will have to bring a lot of bite for anything to change.
List of your president’s fvck ups in today’s press conference:
- claimed all the women are liars - he doesn’t need proof
- said he’ll be listening to all the women’s testimonies tomorrow - yet only one is going to be talking
- confirmed he is biased because a woman has wrongfully accused him before (that was never cleared)
- confirmed its all about his ego, because he “could choose others if he wanted to” but wants Kav
- kept bringing up President Obama, mentioned his name more than 10 times - Trump is still obsessed with him
- says 52% of women voted for him - it was 41%. 52% of WHITE WOMEN voted for him - curious blunder
- claimed the UN audience was not laughing at him, but with him... hmmm
Yep - Iggy’s Dear Leader
agip wrote:
Since yo' asked. wrote:
1) They were underage and parents pressured them. 100s stopped going to him. He was an adult figure.
2) They were kids. Parents were forcing them to go to Church. Priests are in a position of leadership.
Next question.
some gymnasts were minors, some were fully adults. That doesn't fly. easier to sweep under the rug than confront. same with this kav accuser. You want to be in the crowd, having fun. it wasn't 100% rapes all the time...you tell yourself it won't happen to you.
as for the church - the point is that it's always easier to sweep these things under the rug - to say 'aw i heard about what happned to Jimmy but it won't happen to my kid.' Same here. girls hearing what happned to other girls...they saying 'that would never happen to me" until it does.
we all do this. Hell runners are the worst - 'I'll go out way too fast every week, because everyone else does it - maybe this time I won't die in the last mile.'
Is there a point in there or were you just posting drunk?
Flagpole wrote:
Anyone want to tell me now that I'm wrong that Kavanaugh won't be confirmed?
Just to be clear, I said this as soon as Avanetti announced he had someone who would make accusations...this was back on Sunday, and I will say it again...Kavanaugh will NOT be confirmed.
You were waaaaaay late on that brother. Most of us had already said as much long before you.
Way to go out on a limb after a 3rd accuser comes forward. LOL
Better Late than Never wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Anyone want to tell me now that I'm wrong that Kavanaugh won't be confirmed?
Just to be clear, I said this as soon as Avanetti announced he had someone who would make accusations...this was back on Sunday, and I will say it again...Kavanaugh will NOT be confirmed.
You were waaaaaay late on that brother. Most of us had already said as much long before you.
Way to go out on a limb after a 3rd accuser comes forward. LOL
Some of you did, yes, and I gave those of you who did credit for doing so when I did it.
Better Late than Never wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Anyone want to tell me now that I'm wrong that Kavanaugh won't be confirmed?
Just to be clear, I said this as soon as Avanetti announced he had someone who would make accusations...this was back on Sunday, and I will say it again...Kavanaugh will NOT be confirmed.
You were waaaaaay late on that brother. Most of us had already said as much long before you.
Way to go out on a limb after a 3rd accuser comes forward. LOL
No kidding. It took the third accuser to finally convince you of this.
Brainiac, this one is.
No kidding wrote:
Better Late than Never wrote:
You were waaaaaay late on that brother. Most of us had already said as much long before you.
Way to go out on a limb after a 3rd accuser comes forward. LOL
No kidding. It took the third accuser to finally convince you of this.
Brainiac, this one is.
Never said it made me a brainiac. Many here think he will be confirmed.
Now the GOP is apparently intent to make it a circus by claiming two men have come forward separately saying they were with Mark Judge and assaulted Ford.
It wasn't Kavanaugh, it was me.
It wasn't you, it was me.
Meanwhile Mark Judge is cowering in that beach house
BTW, wasn't there someone here touting the USC/Los Angeles Times poll as the ultimate barometer?
Maybe not any more.
Trump approval 39% disapprove 57%
House preference
Democratic candidate 50% Republican candidate 36%
And so forth
https://drive.google.com/file/d/17a2G4FsTE53XDsZEi9EH4pHcKpCmOtvO/view
Flagpole wrote:
No kidding wrote:
No kidding. It took the third accuser to finally convince you of this.
Brainiac, this one is.
Never said it made me a brainiac. Many here think he will be confirmed.
Are you going to predict we land on the moon too?
Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?
Awsi Dooger wrote:
Now the GOP is apparently intent to make it a circus by claiming two men have come forward separately saying they were with Mark Judge and assaulted Ford.
It wasn't Kavanaugh, it was me.
It wasn't you, it was me.
Meanwhile Mark Judge is cowering in that beach house
Don't you think this information should be brought to light? What do these two men have to gain by coming forward?
Ringmaster wrote:
Awsi Dooger wrote:
Now the GOP is apparently intent to make it a circus by claiming two men have come forward separately saying they were with Mark Judge and assaulted Ford.
It wasn't Kavanaugh, it was me.
It wasn't you, it was me.
Meanwhile Mark Judge is cowering in that beach house
Don't you think this information should be brought to light? What do these two men have to gain by coming forward?
I don't know, but one thing is certain.
Republicans are afraid to let the FBI sort it all out.
Looks likes Avenetti's client is not credible.
It all hinges on accuser #1's testimony.
but hillary . . . wrote:
Hardloper wrote:
I'm not trying to make it about Hillary...
... did-clinton-laugh-at-a-rape-victim
The expect, "But Hillary . . . " defense. The usual Hardloper defensive when he has lost.
WHAT THE HEY?: Why have you suddenly crawled out of the woodwork (troll hole) and started posting in this thread using your real name? You have previously stated you "rarely, if ever" post here. Now you seem to have the need to post a lot...and post DURING you work day? You do have a full-time job. Your employer may be watching. Keep safe. Avoid posting while at work.
Yeah, Hillary Clinton had TONS of voters bussed in from all over the place and still lost.
If Trump had done that it would've been posted on here daily.
You're all just biased losers. I don't need to wait till 2020 to tell you that Flagpole will be proven wrong as I could care less. Him being defeated with his predictions based on fake news is too hilarious to not laugh at. He's a clown, take him with a grain of salt. The rest of you are suckers being dragged into his trailer park mentality. Now THAT'S FUNNY!!!!
Fat hurts wrote:
Ringmaster wrote:
Don't you think this information should be brought to light? What do these two men have to gain by coming forward?
I don't know, but one thing is certain.
Republicans are afraid to let the FBI sort it all out.
You keep telling yourself that fatty man! LOL!
:Sigh wrote:
Looks likes Avenetti's client is not credible.
It all hinges on accuser #1's testimony.
Why do you think she's not credible?
I haven't seen any information that strongly suggests she is or is not credible.
If Republicans really cared about credibility they would let the FBI investigate. And at the very least, they would force Mark Judge and his former girlfriend to testify.
Republicans are scared to death of the truth.