No, you're really not. What you are advocating for is to ignore every study that does not align with your feelings.
The studies have been done. The verdict is in.
///////////////
"Vaccines and Autism: A Summary of Research
... Conclusion:
Extensive research and reviews by organizations such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), World Health Organization (WHO), and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) consistently conclude that there is no scientific evidence supporting a link between vaccines and autism.
...
//////////
WAIT! WAIT! I don't like the conclusions of those studies. Let's study it again!
I'm sure you would defend the studies big tobacco funded to the death as well...
I truly admire how you are completely incapable of making a logical argument but you are infinitely capable of making up nonsense to project onto others.
Here is a helpful hint for you. Whenever it strikes you to type, "I'm sure you . . .", just stop and ask yourself if you really want to embarrass yourself again.
When one describes how a proper study should be done, he is advocating for a proper study. He was also quite clear about the faults in the study you cited. Work on reading the entire post and comprehending it before responding in a way that makes it clear you did not.
He assumes most of the children have never seen a doctor and just asserts the data is worthless.
Where did I say that no study should be done? I just said that that particular study that you cited is garbage and explained why. I even offered my suggestion for running a better study
On the other hand, you just wrote: "The vaccines are problematic. They need to be researched further and improved or replaced. Anyone who says this is a non-issue is an idiot, a liar, or profiting off of vaccines."
It looks like you have already decided that the issue that vaccines are dangerous is settled. Concerning you rant, could you elaborate on a few things:
Which vaccines? all, some? What does "problematic" mean? All vaccines have well-known side-effects, is that you are referring to? In a world with unlimited resources vaccines can be improved or replaced with better version, but if a better version cannot be found, what is your suggestion? Is your opinion that we should divert significant resources from research on cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, infectious diseases, etc.. to improve vaccine safety?
Problematic means there are concerns about the side effects.
One side has a financial interest in maintain the status quo.
One side has no financial interest.
I wonder which side is more likely to lie...
Making little progress. Who is concerned and about which side effects? For which vaccines? As Real Obvi pointed out, the relationship between vaccination status and autism has been beaten to death. Due to the fake Wakefield study, it is probably one of the most studied potential side-effects. The overwhelming consensus is that the probability that vaccines cause autism is extremely low (because it cannot be proven that it is 0). If you really believe that this is just because of "big pharma" you do not understand how science works (and BTW, big pharma makes pennies on the dollars on vaccines, as all patents have expired long ago). Showing that vaccines do not cause autism results in a paper is second-tier journal that nobody cares about, but if you can convincingly show that vaccines DO cause autism, then there is a number of top publications, tenure and a Nobel Prize waiting for you.
Problematic means there are concerns about the side effects.
One side has a financial interest in maintain the status quo.
One side has no financial interest.
I wonder which side is more likely to lie...
Making little progress. Who is concerned and about which side effects? For which vaccines? As Real Obvi pointed out, the relationship between vaccination status and autism has been beaten to death. Due to the fake Wakefield study, it is probably one of the most studied potential side-effects. The overwhelming consensus is that the probability that vaccines cause autism is extremely low (because it cannot be proven that it is 0). If you really believe that this is just because of "big pharma" you do not understand how science works (and BTW, big pharma makes pennies on the dollars on vaccines, as all patents have expired long ago). Showing that vaccines do not cause autism results in a paper is second-tier journal that nobody cares about, but if you can convincingly show that vaccines DO cause autism, then there is a number of top publications, tenure and a Nobel Prize waiting for you.
There are many other neurodevelopment disorders besides autism.
Or what, scream at the top of my lungs in the house "this is our house"? Yea I think I'll avoid low class behavior and give them a minute of silence. I don't like yelling it public. It's crass.
For one, doesn't that study define "right wing violence" include ANY instance of a white prison gang getting into a fight? That's not violence in the conventional sense – what most people think of violence as.
Secondly, the study excludes 9/11 which is HUGE - just under 3k killed then.
“Since 1990, far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists, including 227 events that took more than 520 lives,” the study said. “In this same period, far-left extremists committed 42 ideologically motivated attacks that took 78 lives.”
Any State that has built and relied on WINDMILLS and SOLAR for power are seeing RECORD BREAKING INCREASES IN ELECTRICITY AND ENERGY COSTS. THE SCAM OF THE CENTURY!
Any State that has built and relied on WINDMILLS and SOLAR for power are seeing RECORD BREAKING INCREASES IN ELECTRICITY AND ENERGY COSTS. THE SCAM OF THE CENTURY!
Any State that has built and relied on WINDMILLS and SOLAR for power are seeing RECORD BREAKING INCREASES IN ELECTRICITY AND ENERGY COSTS. THE SCAM OF THE CENTURY!
I am pleased to inform our many U.S.A. Patriots that I am designating ANTIFA, A SICK, DANGEROUS, RADICAL LEFT DISASTER, AS A MAJOR TERRORIST ORGANIZATION. I will also be strongly recommending that those funding ANTIFA be thoroughly investigated in accordance with the highest legal standards and practices. Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Trump is right. Aunt Tifa is a criminal organization.
Truly sinister.
i tried to visit the Aunt Tifa regional office for instructions and these shysters tried to tell me that they have no offices. They only operate in the brains of Red cap wearing slack jaw inbreeders.
Great news about those Losers antifa. In related news, better news, we're on the right track boys. Border secure. Catch and release terrible policy is Over. They have to go back.......
For one, doesn't that study define "right wing violence" include ANY instance of a white prison gang getting into a fight? That's not violence in the conventional sense – what most people think of violence as.
Secondly, the study excludes 9/11 which is HUGE - just under 3k killed then.
“Since 1990, far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists, including 227 events that took more than 520 lives,” the study said. “In this same period, far-left extremists committed 42 ideologically motivated attacks that took 78 lives.”
Hate to break it to you but Saudis and al-Qaeda are not US based.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.
