OFFICIAL LRC President Donald Trump SECOND TERM Thread

Charlie has a point (of impact) wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

I did not see a single Democrat stand for the young man. Which ones did?

Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Deborah Dingell to start.

Noyankee wrote:

Charlie has a point (of impact) wrote:

Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Deborah Dingell to start.

Are you kidding me?! why would anyone stand for that fkn scumbag, going around thinking he can talk to people?

I’m starting to understand liberal point of view. the only issue remaining is that I’m not a coward, so this part of the indoctrination is still a bit of a hurdle, but fk these people going around talking. MLK too, by the same logic. Fk him. No bullet too soon.

Noyankee wrote:

Noyankee wrote:

Are you kidding me?! why would anyone stand for that fkn scumbag, going around thinking he can talk to people?

I’m starting to understand liberal point of view. the only issue remaining is that I’m not a coward, so this part of the indoctrination is still a bit of a hurdle, but fk these people going around talking. MLK too, by the same logic. Fk him. No bullet too soon.

Liberals only need to overcome their cowardice. I ask them who else needs to die for speaking and they clam up like the little cowardly weasels they are…when everybody clearly knows they have more on their list. Why wait to cheer afterwards?

holy moly> wrote:

Noyankee wrote:

Liberals only need to overcome their cowardice. I ask them who else needs to die for speaking and they clam up like the little cowardly weasels they are…when everybody clearly knows they have more on their list. Why wait to cheer afterwards?

what is wrong with you?

Noyankee wrote:

holy moly> wrote:

what is wrong with you?

Me? it’s liberals cheering the death of a man for speaking. I’m pointing it out. it might suck but them the facts

Noyankee wrote:

Noyankee wrote:

Are you kidding me?! why would anyone stand for that fkn scumbag, going around thinking he can talk to people?

I’m starting to understand liberal point of view. the only issue remaining is that I’m not a coward, so this part of the indoctrination is still a bit of a hurdle, but fk these people going around talking. MLK too, by the same logic. Fk him. No bullet too soon.

Liberals only need to overcome their cowardice. I ask them who else needs to die for speaking and they clam up like the little cowardly weasels they are…when everybody clearly knows they have more on their list. Why wait to cheer afterwards?

El Runkin wrote:

Noyankee wrote:

Liberals only need to overcome their cowardice. I ask them who else needs to die for speaking and they clam up like the little cowardly weasels they are…when everybody clearly knows they have more on their list. Why wait to cheer afterwards?

They do have more. They are not going to stop. Why would they? Your ilk did absolutely nothing after they sniped a guy that even you believe was the next leader of your movement. The liberals would be crazy to not take out more of you, while you're sitting on your tuffets debating like the goddam People's Front of Judea (PFJ).

tex mex wrote:

Message read loud and clear. If you are a black mayor Trump is gonna send tanks to your city to knock you down a few pegs.

holy moly> wrote:

Noyankee wrote:

Me? it’s liberals cheering the death of a man for speaking. I’m pointing it out. it might suck but them the facts

Yes, you.

I'm a liberal cheering for all of you to stop. You and everyone trying to justify their beliefs/political positions due to the death of someone should just stop. And stop now. And that most assuredly applies to you.

Sally Vix wrote:

Charlie has a point (of impact) wrote:

Many Democrats did stand and applaud for DJ. Of course, if you or Trump actually cared about kids dying of brain tumors you wouldn't have cut funding for cancer research. So, no, DJ was not a disgusting piece of filth. The disgusting piece of filth using him as a prop on the other hand...

I did not see a single Democrat stand for the young man. Which ones did?

Noyankee wrote:

El Runkin wrote:

They do have more. They are not going to stop. Why would they? Your ilk did absolutely nothing after they sniped a guy that even you believe was the next leader of your movement. The liberals would be crazy to not take out more of you, while you're sitting on your tuffets debating like the goddam People's Front of Judea (PFJ).

I think, philosophically, that Charlie Kirk was clearly next up to carry the torch for MAGA. He most clearly defined what it means and he spoke openly and debated with others without a single word of violence.

This is why they celebrate his death. His mission will get stronger now, just need the right person to carry the torch. Megyn Kelly perhaps. Vivek. Don Jr.

Monster shoes to fill. But, fk em, we ain’t losing.

BillionairesForHire wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

I did not see a single Democrat stand for the young man. Which ones did?

Every single one of them stood up and voted to keep cancer research funding and other funding that helps vulnerable, underprivileged kids. Republicans voted to gut it. The vote is what matters. The rest is bluster.

building 7 wrote:

quatremortesdansohio wrote:

None of that means anything to me. I know that Trillions in investment are coming to America because Trump challenged their bluffs and they all caved. The future is bright and this is no more than a bump in the road to greatness reborn. Sorry for Charlie. He was going to be President someday, but an ANTIFA with a rifle ended that destiny.

Please elaborate challenged what bluffs?

building 7 wrote:

Noyankee wrote:

I’m just curious, all you liberals on here that are in favor of assassinating people for speaking, who else would you all like to have assassinated?

The negotiators invited by Trump to Qatar were there to speak and there was an assassination attempt. You were vehemently against this right?

*trump2028 wrote:

President Trump Announces Bold Action to Crush Violent Crime in Memphis

This morning, President Donald J. Trump announced plans to deploy federal resources to Memphis, Tennessee, as part of the Trump Administration’s aggressive push to dismantle the rampant violent crime fueled by failed Democrat governance in major cities. ...