Duane wrote:
what he lied about what a discussion with the Russians post election, pre inauguration which is entirely legal. He should not have lied about it though.
pre inauguration which is entirely ILLEGAL.
Duane wrote:
what he lied about what a discussion with the Russians post election, pre inauguration which is entirely legal. He should not have lied about it though.
pre inauguration which is entirely ILLEGAL.
'splain wrote:
what is the current Republican platform on race and gender?
Back to the 1950s for women, with a southern lynching twist for keep the wrong people under control, and an interment camp for non-whites add-on a la Germany in the 1940s.
L L wrote:
Duane wrote:
what he lied about what a discussion with the Russians post election, pre inauguration which is entirely legal. He should not have lied about it though.
If Trump was directing Flynn to make a deal with Russia as a representative of the US before he was inaugurated, that is not legal.
Here we go again.
How many times has Mueller postponed the sentencing? Your head is gonna roll in the coming months, and I have no obligation to tell you why.
Trump is coming.
The clown's ARE done.
Ah, The AZ Trump police. Racism in action.
The copy walks up on a traffic stop. Tells the woman she under arrest. She asks why. He then states she is resisting arrest. Then he punched the woman. Then he drags her along the pavement.
So much for the "You have the right to remain silent ...".
L L wrote:
Michael Flynn's sentencing will be in December.
Remember him?
Trump's first National Security Adviser.
He spoke to the Russians about US sanctions before Trump was inaugurated.
The he lied to the FBI and was fired and subsequently charged for the lying early in 2017.
He finally made a guilty plea last December and it's taking a year to sentence him.
He has been Cooperating with Mueller.
I wonder what the cooperation was to lead to this sentencing.
If Trump directed him to talk sanctions with Russia before the inauguration, it would be a violation of the Logan Act - an impeachable offense.
I remember him. After all this came out, Flynn retroactively registered as a foreign agent under the Foreign Agent Registration Act.
So we can add a second line to my meme:
Let that sink in. Trump's campaign chairman is GUILTY of CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE UNITED STATES.
Let that sink in. Trump hired a FOREIGN AGENT as NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR.
L L wrote:
Duane wrote:
what he lied about what a discussion with the Russians post election, pre inauguration which is entirely legal. He should not have lied about it though.
If Trump was directing Flynn to make a deal with Russia as a representative of the US before he was inaugurated, that is not legal.
Here we go again.
How many times have Mueller's lawyers forced a postponement of the sentencing? Your head is gonna roll in the coming months, and I have no obligation to tell you why.
Trump is DONE.
The clown's ARE the TRUMPERS.
I don't know that Mueller has ever postponed the Flynn sentencing.
They have been trying to arrive at the right plea deal for a while.
Now they have a sentencing time frame, so they have agreed to something. Flynn gave something to Mueller.
Michael Cohen has given info to Mueller.
Manafort is working on a shorter sentence than he otherwise would get.
Rick Gates gave something for his shortened sentence.
The public does not know what has been given to Mueller to date.
But Trump has a good idea.
A little resort in Cuba wrote:
L L wrote:
If Trump was directing Flynn to make a deal with Russia as a representative of the US before he was inaugurated, that is not legal.
Here we go again.
How many times has Mueller postponed the sentencing? Your head is gonna roll in the coming months, and I have no obligation to tell you why.
Trump is coming.
The clown's ARE done.
You guys been noticing the cracks in the confidence regarding Trump-Russia colllluuuuuusssion?
First it was Woodward saying he flat out didn't see any evidence of collusion, despite "looking hard for it for two years."
Then Page says during her testimony that at the time of the Special Counsel appointment, no evidence of collusion existed.
Schiff for Brains has gone from "I've seen more than enough evidence for collusion to be proven" (early 2017) to now skirting the question entirely.
Then, a couple nights ago, I watched an interview with Brennan where he says something like, "we need to be open to whether or not any collusion is proven.....but the investigation must be completed....."
So Brennan, who first said he saw no collusion (May 2017), then said there's no doubt there was collusion (spring 2018), now seems to be backpeddling to "I guess we'll see."
Despite a "Trump bump," these steelworkers are mad as hell and ready to revolt.
L L wrote:
I don't know that Mueller has ever postponed the Flynn sentencing.
They have been trying to arrive at the right plea deal for a while.
Now they have a sentencing time frame, so they have agreed to something. Flynn gave something to Mueller.
Michael Cohen has given info to Mueller.
Manafort is working on a shorter sentence than he otherwise would get.
Rick Gates gave something for his shortened sentence.
The public does not know what has been given to Mueller to date.
But Trump has a good idea.
Flagpole knows.
A little resort in Cuba wrote:
L L wrote:
If Trump was directing Flynn to make a deal with Russia as a representative of the US before he was inaugurated, that is not legal.
Here we go again.
How many times has Mueller postponed the sentencing? Your head is gonna roll in the coming months, and I have no obligation to tell you why.
Trump is coming.
The clown's ARE done.
You guys been noticing their are no cracks in the confidence regarding Trump-Russia colllluuuuuusssion?
First it was Trump saying he flat out didn't see any evidence of collusion, despite "looking hard for it for two years."
Then Trump says during he would provide testimony that at the time of the Special Counsel appointment, no evidence of collusion existed.
Fox and Breitbart have gone from "I've seen no evidence for collusion to be proven" (early 2017) to now skirting the question entirely.
Then, a couple nights ago, I watched an interview on Fox News where Trump says something like, "witch hunt"
So Trump, who first said he saw no collusion (May 2017), then said there's no doubt there never any collusion (spring 2018), now seems to be backpeddling to "witch hunt."
What about that collusion thing? wrote:
A little resort in Cuba wrote:
Here we go again.
How many times has Mueller postponed the sentencing? Your head is gonna roll in the coming months, and I have no obligation to tell you why.
Trump is coming.
The clown's ARE done.
You guys been noticing the cracks in the confidence regarding Trump-Russia colllluuuuuusssion?
First it was Woodward saying he flat out didn't see any evidence of collusion, despite "looking hard for it for two years."
Then Page says during her testimony that at the time of the Special Counsel appointment, no evidence of collusion existed.
Schiff for Brains has gone from "I've seen more than enough evidence for collusion to be proven" (early 2017) to now skirting the question entirely.
Then, a couple nights ago, I watched an interview with Brennan where he says something like, "we need to be open to whether or not any collusion is proven.....but the investigation must be completed....."
So Brennan, who first said he saw no collusion (May 2017), then said there's no doubt there was collusion (spring 2018), now seems to be backpeddling to "I guess we'll see."
Ummmmm. Ever heard of the Trump Tower Meeting.
Collusion.
Proven.
What about that collusion thing? wrote:
A little resort in Cuba wrote:
Here we go again.
How many times has Mueller postponed the sentencing? Your head is gonna roll in the coming months, and I have no obligation to tell you why.
Trump is coming.
The clown's ARE done.
You guys been noticing their are no cracks in the confidence regarding Trump-Russia colllluuuuuusssion?
First it was Trump saying he flat out didn't see any evidence of collusion, despite "looking hard for it for two years."
Then Trump says during he would provide testimony that at the time of the Special Counsel appointment, no evidence of collusion existed.
Fox and Breitbart have gone from "I've seen no evidence for collusion to be proven" (early 2017) to now skirting the question entirely.
Then, a couple nights ago, I watched an interview on Fox News where Trump says something like, "witch hunt"
So Trump, who first said he saw no collusion (May 2017), then said there's no doubt there never any collusion (spring 2018), now seems to be backpeddling to "witch hunt."
That's weak. Not even remotely funny.
If you're going to parody a post, at least make it make sense.
You cannot be sirius wrote:
Ummmmm. Ever heard of the Trump Tower Meeting.
Collusion.
Proven.
Yep. Ever heard of Veselnitskaya's meeting with Dem operatives the day before and after the Trump Tower meeting?
Conspiracy.
Proven.
Trump is coming.
The clown's ARE DEAD.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIbf6wB8LSUWhat about that collusion thing? wrote:
A little resort in Cuba wrote:
Here we go again.
How many times has Mueller postponed the sentencing? Your head is gonna roll in the coming months, and I have no obligation to tell you why.
Trump is coming.
The clown's ARE done.
You guys been noticing their are no cracks in the confidence regarding Trump-Russia colllluuuuuusssion?
First it was Trump saying he flat out didn't see any evidence of collusion, despite "looking hard for it for two years."
Then Trump says during he would provide testimony that at the time of the Special Counsel appointment, no evidence of collusion existed.
Fox and Breitbart have gone from "I've seen no evidence for collusion to be proven" (early 2017) to now skirting the question entirely.
Then, a couple nights ago, I watched an interview on Fox News where Trump says something like, "witch hunt"
So Trump, who first said he saw no collusion (May 2017), then said there's no doubt there never any collusion (spring 2018), now seems to be backpeddling to "witch hunt."
+1
You cannot be sirius wrote:
Ummmmm. Ever heard of the Trump Tower Meeting.
Collusion.
Proven.
+1
'splain wrote:
NewPlanforTheRepublicanParty wrote:
I 100% agree which is why I outlined the above. I think Republicans are currently losing by taking unpopular stances on race and gender with the changing demographics. To be competitive in the future, I am proposing they scrap what they're doing now and go back to economic arguments instead of angering young people, POC, and women. I don't think young folks today will get more conservative as they age if the party stays where it is at on race and gender.
In your opinion, what is the current Republican platform on race and gender?
I think the current platform for the Republicans on race and gender is that those things are by and large things of the past. When controversial things come up on race or gender, they are used as tools to strengthen their base. Every American, under a Republican system, has the opportunity to pursue what they want and live out their American dream.
I just think they could do more to affirm some issues of race and gender to bring more people into the party. They can still say racism and sexism do not run rampant in this great country but that bad actors should be condemned. On Kavanaugh, are you telling me that they cannot propose a new Supreme Court Justice? You have lawmakers not taking a firm stance on possible sexual assault and discrediting a doctor who's family has been threatened. How does that help you sure up the woman vote. How does attacking Serena Williams bring POC into the party? I think the Republicans should tone done race and gender. Get away from abortion. What does passing policy there even bring you? They could just play to their economic argument. Sort of follow Nike's lead. Be capitalist AF but come out in support of women and POC. The younger generations are there. The people who are going to be the largest shares of voters in this country will have been Obama voters.
I think the party is being shortsighted. I think Trump could win in 2020 but he and many others are doing very little to build the party past that point by sounding off the way they are. Calling women dogs, being anti immigrant (calling Mexicans rapists), not believing sexual assault victims and the way you respond to something like this. You can only play on the fears of people for so long. It got Trump elected -- illegal immigrants are taking your jobs...but what happens when the white share of this country goes down. I would go full stop. Apologize to Dr. Ford. We're sorry. We hear you. This is a party for women. When something is obviously racist -- racism is terrible. But in our America we are working to provide opportunities for all.
((btw I'm not a Republican I just don't understand where their votes are coming from after 2020 if they keep acting like this))
What about that collusion thing? wrote:
A little resort in Cuba wrote:
Here we go again.
How many times has Mueller postponed the sentencing? Your head is gonna roll in the coming months, and I have no obligation to tell you why.
Trump is coming.
The clown's ARE done.
You guys been noticing the cracks in the confidence regarding Trump-Russia colllluuuuuusssion?
First it was Woodward saying he flat out didn't see any evidence of collusion, despite "looking hard for it for two years."
Then Page says during her testimony that at the time of the Special Counsel appointment, no evidence of collusion existed.
Schiff for Brains has gone from "I've seen more than enough evidence for collusion to be proven" (early 2017) to now skirting the question entirely.
Then, a couple nights ago, I watched an interview with Brennan where he says something like, "we need to be open to whether or not any collusion is proven.....but the investigation must be completed....."
So Brennan, who first said he saw no collusion (May 2017), then said there's no doubt there was collusion (spring 2018), now seems to be backpeddling to "I guess we'll see."
Look how frightened he is that his name is going to be showing up all over the "redacted" documents. Love it.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/09/19/brennan_fbi_has_obligation_to_circumvent_trump_constitutional_oath_to_united_states.htmlNewPlanforTheRepublicanParty wrote:
I think the party is being shortsighted. I think Trump could win in 2020 but he and many others are doing very little to build the party past that point by sounding off the way they are.
Trump will not win re-election. He will realize that. Rather than face a cruising defeat, Trump will decide not to run. Plain, and simple.
Yep.^^^
One by one wrote:
You cannot be sirius wrote:
Ummmmm. Ever heard of the Trump Tower Meeting.
Collusion.
Proven.
Yep. Ever heard of Veselnitskaya's meeting with Dem operatives the day before and after the Trump Tower meeting?
Conspiracy.
Proven.
Trump is coming.
The clown's ARE DEAD.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIbf6wB8LSU