runnerboy70 wrote:
Beware....You shall reap what you sow....
Best post on here. Damn, imagine 190 pages of worthless bickering between people that need to touch some f*cking grass.
-
31
-
Jeff Wigand wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
What did Nixon do?
REally nothing
He was complicit in trying to cover up his administration’s connection to the break in of the offices of the Democratic Party. There are a few movies on the subject, assuming books aren’t your thing.
How was he complicit in a crime he knew nothing about until it was in the newspapers?
He did help try to obstruct an investigation into this minor burglary.cimmitted without his knowledge or oky... this is hardly lying us into a war or invading seven nations on lies or Iran Contra -- all far more serious crimes committed by later presidents, none of who had to leave office.
Hence the need to sensationalize and sell the story. "What did the president know and when did he know it?". "It was not the crime but the cover-up".
I don't need Hollywood to get the "facts". I lived thru it.
The Powers that be used the media to get rid of a president who had just been elected 49 states to one.
112 -
Jeff Wigand wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
That's absurd.
The ingroup had him impeached over out and out lies and then some nonsense and now is raiding his home.
Trump has faced virtually no consequences for his numerous illegal activities. He was rightfully impeached for pressuring a foreign head of government to announce an investigation of his political rival and also for inciting a riot in an attempt to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power at the end of his shameless administration.
All of that is distinct from what’s he done as a private citizen. He’s a fraud and he’d sell out his own flesh and blood, as well as his country, if he thought it would benefit him in the least.
Trump asked about Hunter Biden's illegal dealings in Ukraine and Joe Biden's threat to withhold $1 billion in aid if Ukraine did not dump the guy investigating those dealings.
That's the big smoking gun you can come up with?
That's your proof of numerous illegal activities?
214 -
carmine9 wrote:
Jeff Wigand wrote:
He was complicit in trying to cover up his administration’s connection to the break in of the offices of the Democratic Party. There are a few movies on the subject, assuming books aren’t your thing.
How was he complicit in a crime he knew nothing about until it was in the newspapers?
He did help try to obstruct an investigation into this minor burglary.cimmitted without his knowledge or oky... this is hardly lying us into a war or invading seven nations on lies or Iran Contra -- all far more serious crimes committed by later presidents, none of who had to leave office.
Hence the need to sensationalize and sell the story. "What did the president know and when did he know it?". "It was not the crime but the cover-up".
I don't need Hollywood to get the "facts". I lived thru it.
The Powers that be used the media to get rid of a president who had just been elected 49 states to one.
“Obstruction of justice” is sufficient reason to remove a president from office. They’re meant to enforce the laws of the United States, not abuse their power to curtail justice for their own political ends.
111 -
carmine9 wrote:
Jeff Wigand wrote:
Trump has faced virtually no consequences for his numerous illegal activities. He was rightfully impeached for pressuring a foreign head of government to announce an investigation of his political rival and also for inciting a riot in an attempt to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power at the end of his shameless administration.
All of that is distinct from what’s he done as a private citizen. He’s a fraud and he’d sell out his own flesh and blood, as well as his country, if he thought it would benefit him in the least.
Trump asked about Hunter Biden's illegal dealings in Ukraine and Joe Biden's threat to withhold $1 billion in aid if Ukraine did not dump the guy investigating those dealings.
That's the big smoking gun you can come up with?
That's your proof of numerous illegal activities?
Trump did not care if Ukraine actually investigated Biden. He just wanted one announced for political purposes, and was using foreign aid as a cudgel.
Tip of the iceberg.
123 -
Jeff Wigand wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
How was he complicit in a crime he knew nothing about until it was in the newspapers?
He did help try to obstruct an investigation into this minor burglary.cimmitted without his knowledge or oky... this is hardly lying us into a war or invading seven nations on lies or Iran Contra -- all far more serious crimes committed by later presidents, none of who had to leave office.
Hence the need to sensationalize and sell the story. "What did the president know and when did he know it?". "It was not the crime but the cover-up".
I don't need Hollywood to get the "facts". I lived thru it.
The Powers that be used the media to get rid of a president who had just been elected 49 states to one.
“Obstruction of justice” is sufficient reason to remove a president from office. They’re meant to enforce the laws of the United States, not abuse their power to curtail justice for their own political ends.
Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama all committed far worse crimes that resulted in the deaths of millions of innocent people.
They could have gone after NIxon for crimes in Cambodia.
Not this BS 3rd rate robbery by a bunch of clowns that Nixon had zip to do with
111 -
Jeff Wigand wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
Trump asked about Hunter Biden's illegal dealings in Ukraine and Joe Biden's threat to withhold $1 billion in aid if Ukraine did not dump the guy investigating those dealings.
That's the big smoking gun you can come up with?
That's your proof of numerous illegal activities?
Trump did not care if Ukraine actually investigated Biden. He just wanted one announced for political purposes, and was using foreign aid as a cudgel.
Tip of the iceberg.
The CFO committed crimes for his own selfish reasons.
Nothing to do with Trump.
010 -
How about Biden bragging about threatening to withhold $1 billion in aid to Ukraine after the US led insurrection that overthrew the elected govt of Ukraine in 2014 unless the Ukraine govt fired the prosecutor investigating Hunter Biden's "job" with Burisma?
Now there's a crime
39 -
09
-
carmine9 wrote:
You are mental ill please seek help - maybe you Adult, RunnerBoy can get a group plan.
101 -
DonaldsTinyHands wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
You are mental ill please seek help - maybe you Adult, RunnerBoy can get a group plan.
Says the guy so triggered by the anti Trump propaganda that he calls himself DonaldsTinyHands!
Stop being a sucker
012 -
carmine9 wrote:
DonaldsTinyHands wrote:
You are mental ill please seek help - maybe you Adult, RunnerBoy can get a group plan.
Says the guy so triggered by the anti Trump propaganda that he calls himself DonaldsTinyHands!
Stop being a sucker
I dont think you understand what 'trigger' means but that is not surprising as you obviously struggle with your grasp on reality.
Did you get to watch or make it in person to this weekend's rally? Now that is the textbook definition of triggered?
70 -
carmine9 wrote:
Jeff Wigand wrote:
“Obstruction of justice” is sufficient reason to remove a president from office. They’re meant to enforce the laws of the United States, not abuse their power to curtail justice for their own political ends.
Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama all committed far worse crimes that resulted in the deaths of millions of innocent people.
They could have gone after NIxon for crimes in Cambodia.
Not this BS 3rd rate robbery by a bunch of clowns that Nixon had zip to do with
It should be easy to list those crimes.
60 -
DonaldsTinyHands wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
Says the guy so triggered by the anti Trump propaganda that he calls himself DonaldsTinyHands!
Stop being a sucker
I dont think you understand what 'trigger' means but that is not surprising as you obviously struggle with your grasp on reality.
Did you get to watch or make it in person to this weekend's rally? Now that is the textbook definition of triggered?
It’s basically impossible to reason with someone who starts with a conclusion and adjusts his reality as needed.
80 -
DonaldsTinyHands wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
Says the guy so triggered by the anti Trump propaganda that he calls himself DonaldsTinyHands!
Stop being a sucker
I dont think you understand what 'trigger' means but that is not surprising as you obviously struggle with your grasp on reality.
Did you get to watch or make it in person to this weekend's rally? Now that is the textbook definition of triggered?
Yea you named yourself after the scary orange man because he doesn't live rent free in your tiny mind.
19 -
DonaldsTinyHands wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
Says the guy so triggered by the anti Trump propaganda that he calls himself DonaldsTinyHands!
Stop being a sucker
I dont think you understand what 'trigger' means but that is not surprising as you obviously struggle with your grasp on reality.
Did you get to watch or make it in person to this weekend's rally? Now that is the textbook definition of triggered?
Calling someone mentally ill for not sharing your view is a classic example of being triggered.
I of course don't watch Trump's rallies nor do I support him.
Just like exposing the CIA/Deep State/Ruling Class propaganda that you lap up.
But you are conditioned to think anyone who does that must love Trump
18 -
Jeff Wigand wrote:
DonaldsTinyHands wrote:
I dont think you understand what 'trigger' means but that is not surprising as you obviously struggle with your grasp on reality.
Did you get to watch or make it in person to this weekend's rally? Now that is the textbook definition of triggered?
It’s basically impossible to reason with someone who starts with a conclusion and adjusts his reality as needed.
Where is the irony guy when you need him?
17 -
Jeff Wigand wrote:
“Obstruction of justice” is sufficient reason to remove a president from office. They’re meant to enforce the laws of the United States, not abuse their power to curtail justice for their own political ends.
Trump's "judge" has a BA from Trump University.
20 -
octrails wrote:
Jeff Wigand wrote:
“Obstruction of justice” is sufficient reason to remove a president from office. They’re meant to enforce the laws of the United States, not abuse their power to curtail justice for their own political ends.
Trump's "judge" has a BA from Trump University.
She did her undergrad at Duke. Stop listening to CNN...
33 -
octrails wrote:
Jeff Wigand wrote:
“Obstruction of justice” is sufficient reason to remove a president from office. They’re meant to enforce the laws of the United States, not abuse their power to curtail justice for their own political ends.
Trump's "judge" has a BA from Trump University.
Good enuff to get her into law school at U MIchigan where she got her JD
03
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.