Does Donald have an all over tan?
-
10
-
It wasn’t an accident when CNN, the voice of the DNC, trotted out the mayor of Baltimore for his opinion on what happened on national TV.
That was the introduction who the democrats will throw out next as their next candidate.
What you got on national TV for all to see is what you get if you run against common sense Americans, drunk San Francisco call girls and Tampon Tim woke candidates as an alternative.
I agree with many things Trump and his party stand for. Most of America is against pronoun America and unless liberal America comes closer to real America, what you saw play out on national TV will continue into the future.
27 -
Did Putin purposely make Trump look foolish by telling him that a Zelensky would accept to give half of Ukraine’s rare earth in exchange for brokering a cease fire agreement (which Russia has signed and violated in the past-basically signing a piece of toilet paper)?
Was he laughing when he saw the meeting in the Oval Office
You “silly” Americans
42 -
Yuydcc wrote:
It wasn’t an accident when CNN, the voice of the DNC, trotted out the mayor of Baltimore for his opinion on what happened on national TV.
That was the introduction who the democrats will throw out next as their next candidate.
What you got on national TV for all to see is what you get if you run against common sense Americans, drunk San Francisco call girls and Tampon Tim woke candidates as an alternative.
I agree with many things Trump and his party stand for. Most of America is against pronoun America and unless liberal America comes closer to real America, what you saw play out on national TV will continue into the future.
You could simplify it. Most of America is against democracy and is in favour of ignorance and bigotry. It represents you. You have found your voice in Trump.
63 -
Glitter Bomb Turbo wrote:
Delta men wrote:
Only MAGanuts think those two clowns in the WH made an impression. The rest of us including the whole world saw first hand on camera how disgusting and appalling Trump and Vance acted with a foreign president. Dug themselves deeper into the abysmal hole they’ll end up in in the end, while alienating the whole world in the meantime
You mean foreign dictator.
The dictator/insurrectionist resides in the WH.
31 -
Armstronglivs wrote:
Glitter Bomb Turbo wrote:
You mean foreign dictator.
The dictator/insurrectionist resides in the WH.
Rinse and repeat with you
14 -
16
-
Glitter Bomb Turbo wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
The dictator/insurrectionist resides in the WH.
Rinse and repeat with you
That's because he's still there. He won't leave.
22 -
Newname wrote:
Trump "eviscerated" no one. He simply showed the excrement that he is. Vance did the same. The rest of the western world puked.
62 -
Obviously a lot of Trump supporters here do not care about supporting democracy and morality and human rights and free speech and justice; so they do not care if Trump's daddy, Putin, continues to move across Europe. Do they care about the economy??? The US did $1.5 TRILLION in trade with Europe last year. The US did $3.5 BILLION in trade with Russia. Let's see how they feel when the economy craters. All because Zelensky refused to manufacture lies about the Bidens to help Trump win the 2020 elections.
92 -
crete wrote:
Glitter Bomb Turbo wrote:
Yes!
I have spotted the zero-IQ people who failed to learn from history.
Do you guys not understand that allowing tyranny/evil/dictatorships to explode in the world outside our borders is a long-term security risk for our country? The western world learned this through several devastating wars and built an alliance to prevent this from occurring again. A war in Europe hurts US interests both in terms of our security and our financial welfare.
This isn't 1939 anymore.
20 -
Runtothelight wrote:
Obviously a lot of Trump supporters here do not care about supporting democracy and morality and human rights and free speech and justice; so they do not care if Trump's daddy, Putin, continues to move across Europe. Do they care about the economy??? The US did $1.5 TRILLION in trade with Europe last year. The US did $3.5 BILLION in trade with Russia. Let's see how they feel when the economy craters. All because Zelensky refused to manufacture lies about the Bidens to help Trump win the 2020 elections.
If you care so much, what are you doing about it? And putting a Ukraine flag in you yard doesn't count. There is an active war going on right now, so put your money where your mouth is and go over there and fight.
16 -
Runtothelight wrote:
Obviously a lot of Trump supporters here do not care about supporting democracy and morality and human rights and free speech and justice; so they do not care if Trump's daddy, Putin, continues to move across Europe. Do they care about the economy??? The US did $1.5 TRILLION in trade with Europe last year. The US did $3.5 BILLION in trade with Russia. Let's see how they feel when the economy craters. All because Zelensky refused to manufacture lies about the Bidens to help Trump win the 2020 elections.
What lies was Zelensky supposed to manufacture?
13 -
This time is different wrote:
crete wrote:
I have spotted the zero-IQ people who failed to learn from history.
Do you guys not understand that allowing tyranny/evil/dictatorships to explode in the world outside our borders is a long-term security risk for our country? The western world learned this through several devastating wars and built an alliance to prevent this from occurring again. A war in Europe hurts US interests both in terms of our security and our financial welfare.
This isn't 1939 anymore.
It's always 1933 or 1939 in Israeli hasbara.
Whenever they are pushing the US to destroy one of their neighbors.
Saddam was Hitler. Qadaffi too. As was Assad. And Putin. Trump too
14 -
The_Real_Bullet_Proof1 wrote:
crete wrote:
I have spotted the zero-IQ people who failed to learn from history.
Do you guys not understand that allowing tyranny/evil/dictatorships to explode in the world outside our borders is a long-term security risk for our country? The western world learned this through several devastating wars and built an alliance to prevent this from occurring again. A war in Europe hurts US interests both in terms of our security and our financial welfare.
So what are you going to do about it?
you have 3 options:
go and fight.
send money.
broker a peace deal.
which one do you propose?
You are correct that I’m no historian, but I do understand geography. In WWII Hitler would have had a monumental logistical obstacle in trying to attack the United States due to the 3,000 miles of Atlantic Ocean. He would have been at a severe disadvantage by having to haul fuel, supplies, equipment and troops over the ocean to fight on our home turf. The same concept applies here with Russia. Russia would have all of the same hurdles to overcome, not to mention the fact that we have nukes.
so we’ve established that Russia is NOT a direct threat to the US, has not attacked us in any way - in fact it’s the opposite we’ve launched missiles at them - and you’re trying to claim that it is a dire situation because the conflict “hurts our interest” in some vague way without explaining why.
I disagree. Whether some towns in Ukraine are part of Ukraine or Russia does not harm us.
therefore the burden of proof is on you to justify a horrifying escalation with a formidable opponent.
Out of the 3 options above, which do you propose?
Putin is the aggressor here, and is a direct threat to Europe. Appease him here as Trump-Vance want to do and he'll be emboldened to go after more former satellite countries.
But go ahead and be an appeaser. The burden of history is on you. Moron..
33 -
Yuydcc wrote:
It wasn’t an accident when CNN, the voice of the DNC, trotted out the mayor of Baltimore for his opinion on what happened on national TV.
That was the introduction who the democrats will throw out next as their next candidate.
What you got on national TV for all to see is what you get if you run against common sense Americans, drunk San Francisco call girls and Tampon Tim woke candidates as an alternative.
I agree with many things Trump and his party stand for. Most of America is against pronoun America and unless liberal America comes closer to real America, what you saw play out on national TV will continue into the future.
You said," I agree with many things Trump and his Part stand for".
Then you also have to agree that, "real America", UN vote last Monday aligned with Russian\South Korea\ Iran all dictators. Mars will be the same in Muskland.
Ya, got your insurrection. Congrats forever known in history as the people who ruined democracy.
20 -
letsrun maggat machine wrote:
The_Real_Bullet_Proof1 wrote:
So what are you going to do about it?
you have 3 options:
go and fight.
send money.
broker a peace deal.
which one do you propose?
You are correct that I’m no historian, but I do understand geography. In WWII Hitler would have had a monumental logistical obstacle in trying to attack the United States due to the 3,000 miles of Atlantic Ocean. He would have been at a severe disadvantage by having to haul fuel, supplies, equipment and troops over the ocean to fight on our home turf. The same concept applies here with Russia. Russia would have all of the same hurdles to overcome, not to mention the fact that we have nukes.
so we’ve established that Russia is NOT a direct threat to the US, has not attacked us in any way - in fact it’s the opposite we’ve launched missiles at them - and you’re trying to claim that it is a dire situation because the conflict “hurts our interest” in some vague way without explaining why.
I disagree. Whether some towns in Ukraine are part of Ukraine or Russia does not harm us.
therefore the burden of proof is on you to justify a horrifying escalation with a formidable opponent.
Out of the 3 options above, which do you propose?
Putin is the aggressor here, and is a direct threat to Europe. Appease him here as Trump-Vance want to do and he'll be emboldened to go after more former satellite countries.
But go ahead and be an appeaser. The burden of history is on you. Moron..
Meanwhile China just sits back and says to itself, " this is way too easy".
Oh, me bad. China has had us by the nuts since 2008.
20 -
Zelennsky makes a lot of money from the war. The donations will stop flowing if there is a ceasefire.
24 -
For those wondering about that Trump-Zelensky phone call back in 2019, I provide the transcript, or maybe people have already forgotten Trump's two impeachment trials? Done with the shouting here, but those who talk about the media and press there - Donald Trump, at the end, called it "great television." That is what he wanted. And Trump let in the Russian state propaganda journalist from Tass, and banned the AP. That shows you who he wanted to see it - Putin. And Glitter Bomb Turbo, I have not seen your drag queen performance, but will if you give us the dates of your next shows?? Finally, your whole "go there and fight" is ridiculous. You did not even go and fight the Nazis in WWII. And don't give us the lame excuse that "I wasn't born yet."21
-
Glitter Bomb Turbo wrote:
It's clear Democrats and Zelenskyy want WW3. What a bunch of war mongers.
It’s just Tim Pool workshopping arguments for his next show
Keeps your eyes peeled for arguments on these boards quickly slipping into the mouths of these lazy uneducated hosts on the right
All the Russian subsidies they’ve received has made them even more complacent than normal
00
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.