Why does Trump cry foul whenever something does not go his way?
He was convicted of rape, the jury was rigged. He lost the 2020 election, the people were rigged. He cheated New York out of millions of dollars, the city was rigged. He sleeps with a porn star, she was rigged. He just received a felony conviction, the jury was rigged. He cheated on his wife several times, the world is rigged. People work for him and he doesn't pay them because they are rigged. How about some cheese with that whine.
I have never heard of a person as old as he is always doing the right thing and has never done anything wrong. Isn't it time to come up with a different reason why Trump gets the wrong end of situations. How about man up, say you are not perfect and carry on.
So, first things first, I was wrong about the details of the charged crimes. I only saw the section referring to "theories) and did not look further up in the document where the details existed. Odd and disappointing to me that National legal voices seem unaware of this. You seem very invested in this to have the knowledge that so many seem lacking.
So Trump is convicted on a misdemeanor committed (it was determined) with the intent to further another crime such as election interference or a tax code violation. Interesting they say intent to break election law when those charged with enforcing election law did not charge him with such. So is the NY DA saying he had intent but failed to do it? Or have they concluded somehow he did interfere (again despite the [Congressional authorized] enforcers seemingly disagreeing)?
But, for a parallel situation, the Clinton private email server which was used seemingly in violation of Federal requirement arguably so she could avoid FOIA disclosures and thus support her 2016 run for President (ie interfere with election). Tell me what I am missing here? Should some eager DA go after her?
So Trump is convicted on a misdemeanor committed (it was determined) with the intent to further another crime such as election interference or a tax code violation. Interesting they say intent to break election law when those charged with enforcing election law did not charge him with such. So is the NY DA saying he had intent but failed to do it? Or have they concluded somehow he did interfere (again despite the [Congressional authorized] enforcers seemingly disagreeing)?
The DA had documents - physical evidence signed by DJT - showing he intended to commit a felony.
A guy breaks into his neighbours house, with the intent of murdering him. Is this just a misdemeanor(b&e)? It's a felony, because the misdemeanor was committed so as to commit a felony.
So Trump is convicted on a misdemeanor committed (it was determined) with the intent to further another crime such as election interference or a tax code violation. Interesting they say intent to break election law when those charged with enforcing election law did not charge him with such. So is the NY DA saying he had intent but failed to do it? Or have they concluded somehow he did interfere (again despite the [Congressional authorized] enforcers seemingly disagreeing)?
The DA had documents - physical evidence signed by DJT - showing he intended to commit a felony.
A guy breaks into his neighbours house, with the intent of murdering him. Is this just a misdemeanor(b&e)? It's a felony, because the misdemeanor was committed so as to commit a felony.
so humor me. Are these the checks he signed? Or what? There is no dispute he paid Cohen and there is no dispute Cohen had previously paid Stormy. I am not totally familiar with all the evidence. So what is this evidence and how does it show the intent to commit the felony?
I consider the Letsrun crowd a pretty bipartisan group. The founders are Republican as us is at least one major moderator. I really learned about the right wing view from this forum. But there are plenty of liberal views as well.
That said, it speaks well for Biden’s chances based on the up and down votes on anti and pro Trump posts in this thread.
It’s not looking good for Trump. And we stop using the word “alleged” for these crimes now.
Upvote this post if you do not want Trump to win the general election.
So, first things first, I was wrong about the details of the charged crimes. I only saw the section referring to "theories) and did not look further up in the document where the details existed. Odd and disappointing to me that National legal voices seem unaware of this. You seem very invested in this to have the knowledge that so many seem lacking.
So Trump is convicted on a misdemeanor committed (it was determined) with the intent to further another crime such as election interference or a tax code violation. Interesting they say intent to break election law when those charged with enforcing election law did not charge him with such. So is the NY DA saying he had intent but failed to do it? Or have they concluded somehow he did interfere (again despite the [Congressional authorized] enforcers seemingly disagreeing)?
But, for a parallel situation, the Clinton private email server which was used seemingly in violation of Federal requirement arguably so she could avoid FOIA disclosures and thus support her 2016 run for President (ie interfere with election). Tell me what I am missing here? Should some eager DA go after her?
"I know not 'seems..." Or "seemingly." Points for style, not so much for content.
I consider the Letsrun crowd a pretty bipartisan group. The founders are Republican as us is at least one major moderator. I really learned about the right wing view from this forum. But there are plenty of liberal views as well.
That said, it speaks well for Biden’s chances based on the up and down votes on anti and pro Trump posts in this thread.
It’s not looking good for Trump. And we stop using the word “alleged” for these crimes now.
Upvote this post if you do not want Trump to win the general election.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.