Yes, if a version of the red guard springs forth in America then we will be in trouble.
It's happening now. Very slowly, but it is happening. The difference between now and the '60s is that some of the unhinged radicals are staffing major institutions, and the people in charge of major institutions are increasingly caving to their demands because it's unprofitable to be called racist, sexist, transphobic, etc., and that's exactly what the "activists" do. They shame and emotionally blackmail people into compliance, which is what the Red Guard did before resorting to overt violence. We're still early enough to stop this. It took years to take hold in China.
This is from Xi Van Fleet, one of the parents protesting the school board in Loudoun County VA:
"An immigrant from China, who as a child had lived through Mao’s Marxist Cultural Revolution, Xi described CRT as the indoctrination of children. What she was seeing in Loudoun County, she said, reminded her of what she witnessed growing up in Mao’s China."
Yeah, there are definitely people who are trying to emulate Mao's Cultural Revolution. They are trying to remove books on Black history and LGBTQ topics from school libraries.
incomprehensible for someone like GD to say 'you know what..sure I know that the GOP literally tried to end democracy a couple years ago, its leader pushed to suspend the Constitution and they will have billions of dollars to spend to continue that fight....and the GOP governor of FL is using full state power to damage a company for strictly political reasons....but I am more worried about undergraduates.'
Incomprehensible.
I'm telling you what I see in the coal mines, and it's not good. Graduates of elite universities occupy the most powerful positions in our society, and a substantial minority of them are ready to do some serious damage in the name of progress. Laugh at me all you want. Lots of people dismiss this stuff until it shows up on their doorstep and destroys their workplaces, schools, and governance.
Read this account from an anti-racist professor. Note that the program he mentored is highly selective. Prior participants include: Stacey Abrams, Paul Wolfowitz, and Francis Fukuyama. I pulled a quote to capture the gist of the piece.
"Like others on the left, I had been dismissive of criticisms of the current discourse on race in the United States. But now my thoughts turned to that moment in the 1970s when leftist organizations imploded, the need to match and raise the militancy of one’s comrades leading to a toxic culture filled with dogmatism and disillusion. How did this happen to a group of bright-eyed high school students?"
GD, you are clearly highly intelligent and well educated. Your observations about the anger in the country are spot on, and yes, the autocratic right and left are a danger to democracy and the truth.
What I think you are missing is that the US is a center right country, with a long history of a dangerous strain of right facing authoritarianism. In America to the extent that extremism exists in this nation, both past and present, it is 90% or more from the right than the left. Equating Jan 6th with whatever went down at Evergreen is like equating an assault rifle and a kitchen knife. It’s the same nonsense saying that antifa poses the same threat as the oath keepers, or better yet that antifa is like Trump using federal officers to clear Lafayette Square or his threats to send the military into our urban centers. I think cancel culture sucks and some of the tactics of the far left progressives deploy are distasteful, but there’s just no comparison to the looming threat from the authoritarian right. Who is the left equivalent of Tucker Carlson, for example. Fascist was given a prime time show on the most watched cable network. C’mon!!
Finally, I’m a professor at a leading academic medical center on a coast. So I guess I’m one of the elites you reference. I do science, I teach the younger students, I care for patients. My institution is devoted to the scientific method, to truth, to harm mitigation, to easing human suffering AND to social justice. Our students betray none of the traits or values you ascribe to them. From my perspective, the threat to science and the truth are almost exclusively from the right and not the left. It’s the right that bars us from researching gun violence or interferes with our ability to work with certain cells. Yes, we have had some minor run ins with animal rights activists, but there’s no comparison.
Finally, I’m a doctor and a scientist, still I fully embrace a person’s gender declaration, but that has no bearing on whether or not they get a prostate exam. You can walk and chew gum at the same time.
That is inaccurate. You can call it a "purely symbolic vote" all you want, but it is a Constitutionally REQUIRED vote and there is NO newly elected president without it. And you seem completely ignorant of the illegal Plan B that was going on simultaneously and which was predicated and contingent on a delay or interruption of the "purely symbolic vote." They were very close to succeeding.
You seem to be another person who could benefit from reading the January 6th Report, including the deposition transcripts and exhibits. For you, I'd particularly recommend all exhibits (texts, emails, transcripts) cited in Chapter 3, specifically those related to Chesebro, Eastman, Clark, Cippollone, Jacob and Barr.
Your decision to "move on" from something you know very little about does not make it any less important. You could trivialize anything by declaring you've "moved on."
Let me summarize the solution to January 6 for you: get better security at the capitol. Done, problem solved, no need to read all that. Now we can move onto the larger problems of 2023 and beyond.
I don't know what to tell you other than you are incredibly ignorant of the facts surrounding the events of January 6th. I gave you a detailed description of what you could do to cure and remedy that deficiency -- read exhibits related to Chesebro and Eastman at a very minimum -- and you ignored it and posted an irrelevancy that only further highlighted your lack of understanding. If you move on to the problems of 2023 and beyond with the same attitude and mentality you've displayed here in this thread, there really isn't much point in you moving on to anything at all.
Ultimately, I think america will not survive intact as it becomes a non-white nation. I don’t think human beings can handle ‘losing their county’ racially and they will fight to stop it. And that means white conservatives will reject democracy and move to some kind of light autocratic government that keeps white prestige.
im not criticizing white people in particular…I don’t think any ethnic group can be rational when other ethnic groups gain power over them.
You need to quit reading selected political stuff on the internet and get out of the house more. Every day reality will alleviate many of your concerns described above.
Well sure we all do. But I’ve been around long enough to know how tribal people are, and how easily they get whipped up by trumpy type politicians.
remember that analysis of where the j6 rioters came from? Mostly from places with quickly declining white populations. They feel they are losing their nation and went to dc to take it back. the klan and proud boys knew trump represented racial politics in effect and saw him as one of their own.
It's happening now. Very slowly, but it is happening. The difference between now and the '60s is that some of the unhinged radicals are staffing major institutions, and the people in charge of major institutions are increasingly caving to their demands because it's unprofitable to be called racist, sexist, transphobic, etc., and that's exactly what the "activists" do. They shame and emotionally blackmail people into compliance, which is what the Red Guard did before resorting to overt violence. We're still early enough to stop this. It took years to take hold in China.
This is from Xi Van Fleet, one of the parents protesting the school board in Loudoun County VA:
"An immigrant from China, who as a child had lived through Mao’s Marxist Cultural Revolution, Xi described CRT as the indoctrination of children. What she was seeing in Loudoun County, she said, reminded her of what she witnessed growing up in Mao’s China."
Yeah, there are definitely people who are trying to emulate Mao's Cultural Revolution. They are trying to remove books on Black history and LGBTQ topics from school libraries.
A school board outside of Seattle voted to stop requiring students to read ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’, a novel about racism and injustice in the Jim Crow-era Deep South.
That is inaccurate. You can call it a "purely symbolic vote" all you want, but it is a Constitutionally REQUIRED vote and there is NO newly elected president without it. And you seem completely ignorant of the illegal Plan B that was going on simultaneously and which was predicated and contingent on a delay or interruption of the "purely symbolic vote." They were very close to succeeding.
You seem to be another person who could benefit from reading the January 6th Report, including the deposition transcripts and exhibits. For you, I'd particularly recommend all exhibits (texts, emails, transcripts) cited in Chapter 3, specifically those related to Chesebro, Eastman, Clark, Cippollone, Jacob and Barr.
Your decision to "move on" from something you know very little about does not make it any less important. You could trivialize anything by declaring you've "moved on."
Let me summarize the solution to January 6 for you: get better security at the capitol. Done, problem solved, no need to read all that. Now we can move onto the larger problems of 2023 and beyond.
More police does not stop the President from inciting a riot. It does not stop his closest allies from organizing white supremacists groups to show up in force, armed. It does not stop an entire political party from spreading lies about the validity of an election, then actively seek to stop transfer of power. It does not stop a President from asking foreign countries to interefere in a US election. It does not stop the President from using the US Attorney General to investigate his political rivals. It does not stop a President from trying to undermine the election counting process by using his appointed USPS head to dismantle postal sorting ability. It does not stop the President from pressuring state officials to change the vote count.
The riot is only the tip of the iceberg. Wake up before you don't have a vote anymore.
Yeah, there are definitely people who are trying to emulate Mao's Cultural Revolution. They are trying to remove books on Black history and LGBTQ topics from school libraries.
The 1960 Harper Lee novel about a black man falsely accused of raping a white woman would still be found in the school library, and teachers could still assign the fiction classic if they chose, according to the article.
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.
I'm telling you what I see in the coal mines, and it's not good. Graduates of elite universities occupy the most powerful positions in our society, and a substantial minority of them are ready to do some serious damage in the name of progress. Laugh at me all you want. Lots of people dismiss this stuff until it shows up on their doorstep and destroys their workplaces, schools, and governance.
Read this account from an anti-racist professor. Note that the program he mentored is highly selective. Prior participants include: Stacey Abrams, Paul Wolfowitz, and Francis Fukuyama. I pulled a quote to capture the gist of the piece.
"Like others on the left, I had been dismissive of criticisms of the current discourse on race in the United States. But now my thoughts turned to that moment in the 1970s when leftist organizations imploded, the need to match and raise the militancy of one’s comrades leading to a toxic culture filled with dogmatism and disillusion. How did this happen to a group of bright-eyed high school students?"
GD, you are clearly highly intelligent and well educated. Your observations about the anger in the country are spot on, and yes, the autocratic right and left are a danger to democracy and the truth.
What I think you are missing is that the US is a center right country, with a long history of a dangerous strain of right facing authoritarianism. In America to the extent that extremism exists in this nation, both past and present, it is 90% or more from the right than the left. Equating Jan 6th with whatever went down at Evergreen is like equating an assault rifle and a kitchen knife. It’s the same nonsense saying that antifa poses the same threat as the oath keepers, or better yet that antifa is like Trump using federal officers to clear Lafayette Square or his threats to send the military into our urban centers. I think cancel culture sucks and some of the tactics of the far left progressives deploy are distasteful, but there’s just no comparison to the looming threat from the authoritarian right. Who is the left equivalent of Tucker Carlson, for example. Fascist was given a prime time show on the most watched cable network. C’mon!!
Finally, I’m a professor at a leading academic medical center on a coast. So I guess I’m one of the elites you reference. I do science, I teach the younger students, I care for patients. My institution is devoted to the scientific method, to truth, to harm mitigation, to easing human suffering AND to social justice. Our students betray none of the traits or values you ascribe to them. From my perspective, the threat to science and the truth are almost exclusively from the right and not the left. It’s the right that bars us from researching gun violence or interferes with our ability to work with certain cells. Yes, we have had some minor run ins with animal rights activists, but there’s no comparison.
Finally, I’m a doctor and a scientist, still I fully embrace a person’s gender declaration, but that has no bearing on whether or not they get a prostate exam. You can walk and chew gum at the same time.
Honestly, I've read many of the things you've written on these boards, and I suspect that you're a lot like the anti-racist professor whose experience I posted on a previous page. You think it's not happening or that it isn't that bad because it hasn't happened to you yet. Wait until somebody tells you the scientific method and asking for evidence are racist practices. Even putting somebody on a scale or calculating their BMI is considered fat phobic and racist, and there are entire academic journals dedicated to these viewpoints. Things will really get bad if you acquire a co-worker or student with a personality disorder armed with these ideas.
GD, you are clearly highly intelligent and well educated. Your observations about the anger in the country are spot on, and yes, the autocratic right and left are a danger to democracy and the truth.
What I think you are missing is that the US is a center right country, with a long history of a dangerous strain of right facing authoritarianism. In America to the extent that extremism exists in this nation, both past and present, it is 90% or more from the right than the left. Equating Jan 6th with whatever went down at Evergreen is like equating an assault rifle and a kitchen knife. It’s the same nonsense saying that antifa poses the same threat as the oath keepers, or better yet that antifa is like Trump using federal officers to clear Lafayette Square or his threats to send the military into our urban centers. I think cancel culture sucks and some of the tactics of the far left progressives deploy are distasteful, but there’s just no comparison to the looming threat from the authoritarian right. Who is the left equivalent of Tucker Carlson, for example. Fascist was given a prime time show on the most watched cable network. C’mon!!
Finally, I’m a professor at a leading academic medical center on a coast. So I guess I’m one of the elites you reference. I do science, I teach the younger students, I care for patients. My institution is devoted to the scientific method, to truth, to harm mitigation, to easing human suffering AND to social justice. Our students betray none of the traits or values you ascribe to them. From my perspective, the threat to science and the truth are almost exclusively from the right and not the left. It’s the right that bars us from researching gun violence or interferes with our ability to work with certain cells. Yes, we have had some minor run ins with animal rights activists, but there’s no comparison.
Finally, I’m a doctor and a scientist, still I fully embrace a person’s gender declaration, but that has no bearing on whether or not they get a prostate exam. You can walk and chew gum at the same time.
Honestly, I've read many of the things you've written on these boards, and I suspect that you're a lot like the anti-racist professor whose experience I posted on a previous page. You think it's not happening or that it isn't that bad because it hasn't happened to you yet. Wait until somebody tells you the scientific method and asking for evidence are racist practices. Even putting somebody on a scale or calculating their BMI is considered fat phobic and racist, and there are entire academic journals dedicated to these viewpoints. Things will really get bad if you acquire a co-worker or student with a personality disorder armed with these ideas.
I think you are too susceptible to clickbait headlines.
This is a vast nation of 330 million people. Weird things are going to happen from place to place in such a giant place.
For-profit media will blast out these few weird events to get clicks and sell ads.
But they are anecdote and not representative of the vast current of American life. you are being radicalized by the media.
GD, you are clearly highly intelligent and well educated. Your observations about the anger in the country are spot on, and yes, the autocratic right and left are a danger to democracy and the truth.
What I think you are missing is that the US is a center right country, with a long history of a dangerous strain of right facing authoritarianism. In America to the extent that extremism exists in this nation, both past and present, it is 90% or more from the right than the left. Equating Jan 6th with whatever went down at Evergreen is like equating an assault rifle and a kitchen knife. It’s the same nonsense saying that antifa poses the same threat as the oath keepers, or better yet that antifa is like Trump using federal officers to clear Lafayette Square or his threats to send the military into our urban centers. I think cancel culture sucks and some of the tactics of the far left progressives deploy are distasteful, but there’s just no comparison to the looming threat from the authoritarian right. Who is the left equivalent of Tucker Carlson, for example. Fascist was given a prime time show on the most watched cable network. C’mon!!
Finally, I’m a professor at a leading academic medical center on a coast. So I guess I’m one of the elites you reference. I do science, I teach the younger students, I care for patients. My institution is devoted to the scientific method, to truth, to harm mitigation, to easing human suffering AND to social justice. Our students betray none of the traits or values you ascribe to them. From my perspective, the threat to science and the truth are almost exclusively from the right and not the left. It’s the right that bars us from researching gun violence or interferes with our ability to work with certain cells. Yes, we have had some minor run ins with animal rights activists, but there’s no comparison.
Finally, I’m a doctor and a scientist, still I fully embrace a person’s gender declaration, but that has no bearing on whether or not they get a prostate exam. You can walk and chew gum at the same time.
Honestly, I've read many of the things you've written on these boards, and I suspect that you're a lot like the anti-racist professor whose experience I posted on a previous page. You think it's not happening or that it isn't that bad because it hasn't happened to you yet. Wait until somebody tells you the scientific method and asking for evidence are racist practices. Even putting somebody on a scale or calculating their BMI is considered fat phobic and racist, and there are entire academic journals dedicated to these viewpoints. Things will really get bad if you acquire a co-worker or student with a personality disorder armed with these ideas.
To sum up: You are neck deep in a conspiracy theory that says highly educated people are not capable of even seeing that they are the tools in a conspiracy that uses their own beliefs to destroy their own beliefs. Mind B L O W N !
You need to quit reading selected political stuff on the internet and get out of the house more. Every day reality will alleviate many of your concerns described above.
Well sure we all do. But I’ve been around long enough to know how tribal people are, and how easily they get whipped up by trumpy type politicians.
remember that analysis of where the j6 rioters came from? Mostly from places with quickly declining white populations. They feel they are losing their nation and went to dc to take it back. the klan and proud boys knew trump represented racial politics in effect and saw him as one of their own.
No, I don't recall that analysis of where the January 6th rioters came from. And I don't know what areas you believe have "quickly declining white populations." And I'd be highly suspicious of the methodology and definitions in any analysis/study that says it somehow linked the two.
I agree people have always been tribal (and it's not always a bad thing either). In the US over the last 70 years, I think the tribalism is largely political and/or religious, and less and less racial to the point where there hardly is any such tribalism left (especially in the demographic you say is practicing it). And I disagree with the Trumpers=racist meme you're posting, which never seems to comport with the reality I see every day, or the significant changes I have seen in the country since growing up inner city in the 70s.
GD, you are clearly highly intelligent and well educated. Your observations about the anger in the country are spot on, and yes, the autocratic right and left are a danger to democracy and the truth.
What I think you are missing is that the US is a center right country, with a long history of a dangerous strain of right facing authoritarianism. In America to the extent that extremism exists in this nation, both past and present, it is 90% or more from the right than the left. Equating Jan 6th with whatever went down at Evergreen is like equating an assault rifle and a kitchen knife. It’s the same nonsense saying that antifa poses the same threat as the oath keepers, or better yet that antifa is like Trump using federal officers to clear Lafayette Square or his threats to send the military into our urban centers. I think cancel culture sucks and some of the tactics of the far left progressives deploy are distasteful, but there’s just no comparison to the looming threat from the authoritarian right. Who is the left equivalent of Tucker Carlson, for example. Fascist was given a prime time show on the most watched cable network. C’mon!!
Finally, I’m a professor at a leading academic medical center on a coast. So I guess I’m one of the elites you reference. I do science, I teach the younger students, I care for patients. My institution is devoted to the scientific method, to truth, to harm mitigation, to easing human suffering AND to social justice. Our students betray none of the traits or values you ascribe to them. From my perspective, the threat to science and the truth are almost exclusively from the right and not the left. It’s the right that bars us from researching gun violence or interferes with our ability to work with certain cells. Yes, we have had some minor run ins with animal rights activists, but there’s no comparison.
Finally, I’m a doctor and a scientist, still I fully embrace a person’s gender declaration, but that has no bearing on whether or not they get a prostate exam. You can walk and chew gum at the same time.
Honestly, I've read many of the things you've written on these boards, and I suspect that you're a lot like the anti-racist professor whose experience I posted on a previous page. You think it's not happening or that it isn't that bad because it hasn't happened to you yet. Wait until somebody tells you the scientific method and asking for evidence are racist practices. Even putting somebody on a scale or calculating their BMI is considered fat phobic and racist, and there are entire academic journals dedicated to these viewpoints. Things will really get bad if you acquire a co-worker or student with a personality disorder armed with these ideas.
NPR just had a speaker discussing the horrible racism of BMI. Some people are trying to prohibit Drs from getting weights and other measurements.
Well sure we all do. But I’ve been around long enough to know how tribal people are, and how easily they get whipped up by trumpy type politicians.
remember that analysis of where the j6 rioters came from? Mostly from places with quickly declining white populations. They feel they are losing their nation and went to dc to take it back. the klan and proud boys knew trump represented racial politics in effect and saw him as one of their own.
No, I don't recall that analysis of where the January 6th rioters came from. And I don't know what areas you believe have "quickly declining white populations." And I'd be highly suspicious of the methodology and definitions in any analysis/study that says it somehow linked the two.
I agree people have always been tribal (and it's not always a bad thing either). In the US over the last 70 years, I think the tribalism is largely political and/or religious, and less and less racial to the point where there hardly is any such tribalism left (especially in the demographic you say is practicing it). And I disagree with the Trumpers=racist meme you're posting, which never seems to comport with the reality I see every day, or the significant changes I have seen in the country since growing up inner city in the 70s.
Now this is social science and not hard science so I am not staking my reputation on it. But it does suggest white fear of losing their nation sparked their insurrection.
NYT:
When the political scientist Robert Pape began studying the issues that motivated the 380 or so people arrested in connection with the attack against the Capitol on Jan. 6, he expected to find that the rioters were driven to violence by the lingering effects of the 2008 Great Recession. But instead he found something very different: Most of the people who took part in the assault came from places, his polling and demographic data showed, that were awash in fears that the rights of minorities and immigrants were crowding out the rights of white people in American politics and culture. If Mr. Pape’s initial conclusions — published on Tuesday in The Washington Post — hold true, they would suggest that the Capitol attack has historical echoes reaching back to before the Civil War, he said in an interview over the weekend. In the shorter term, he added, the study would appear to connect Jan. 6 not only to the once-fringe right-wing theory called the Great Replacement, which holds that minorities and immigrants are seeking to take over the country, but also to events like the far-right rally in Charlottesville, Va., in 2017 where crowds of white men marched with torches chanting, “Jews will not replace us!” “If you look back in history, there has always been a series of far-right extremist movements responding to new waves of immigration to the United States or to movements for civil rights by minority groups,” Mr. Pape said. “You see a common pattern in the Capitol insurrectionists. They are mainly middle-class to upper-middle-class whites who are worried that, as social changes occur around them, they will see a decline in their status in the future.” One fact stood out in Mr. Pape’s study, conducted with the help of researchers at the Chicago Project on Security and Threats, a think tank he runs at the University of Chicago. Counties with the most significant declines in the non-Hispanic white population are the most likely to produce insurrectionists. This finding held true, Mr. Pape determined, even when controlling for population size, distance to Washington, unemployment rate and urban or rural location.
Honestly, I've read many of the things you've written on these boards, and I suspect that you're a lot like the anti-racist professor whose experience I posted on a previous page. You think it's not happening or that it isn't that bad because it hasn't happened to you yet. Wait until somebody tells you the scientific method and asking for evidence are racist practices. Even putting somebody on a scale or calculating their BMI is considered fat phobic and racist, and there are entire academic journals dedicated to these viewpoints. Things will really get bad if you acquire a co-worker or student with a personality disorder armed with these ideas.
NPR just had a speaker discussing the horrible racism of BMI. Some people are trying to prohibit Drs from getting weights and other measurements.
some ethnic groups are shaped differently than others. this is actual hard science. Using the same BMI on various ethnic groups may in fact not make any sense and result in bad health care. I don't see how this is controversial.
The hard part is the 'ok so what do we do now' part. I don't know. But pretending all ethnic groups should have the same BMI graph is not the correct solution.
NPR just had a speaker discussing the horrible racism of BMI. Some people are trying to prohibit Drs from getting weights and other measurements.
some ethnic groups are shaped differently than others. this is actual hard science. Using the same BMI on various ethnic groups may in fact not make any sense and result in bad health care. I don't see how this is controversial.
The hard part is the 'ok so what do we do now' part. I don't know. But pretending all ethnic groups should have the same BMI graph is not the correct solution.
Are you suggesting that if a person has hypertension and is 5'7" and 230 pounds it might be insensitive for a Dr to bring up weight or BMI? Or if a person is 5'7" and 110 pounds and has low bone density weight and BMI should not be brought up?
some ethnic groups are shaped differently than others. this is actual hard science. Using the same BMI on various ethnic groups may in fact not make any sense and result in bad health care. I don't see how this is controversial.
The hard part is the 'ok so what do we do now' part. I don't know. But pretending all ethnic groups should have the same BMI graph is not the correct solution.
Are you suggesting that if a person has hypertension and is 5'7" and 230 pounds it might be insensitive for a Dr to bring up weight or BMI? Or if a person is 5'7" and 110 pounds and has low bone density weight and BMI should not be brought up?
none of this is easy. I'm not making any claims or recommendations here other than to acknowledge that in a multi-ethnic nation we can't pretend everyone should have the same BMI. How that gets applied to health care is above my pay grade.
Are you suggesting that if a person has hypertension and is 5'7" and 230 pounds it might be insensitive for a Dr to bring up weight or BMI? Or if a person is 5'7" and 110 pounds and has low bone density weight and BMI should not be brought up?
none of this is easy. I'm not making any claims or recommendations here other than to acknowledge that in a multi-ethnic nation we can't pretend everyone should have the same BMI. How that gets applied to health care is above my pay grade.
It might be irresponsible for you or me to bring up someone's weight and or eating habits but it's the responsibility of a Dr to give their patients data that can help them get healthier. There are people that don't want Drs to weigh patients or take other measurements.
You need to quit reading selected political stuff on the internet and get out of the house more. Every day reality will alleviate many of your concerns described above.
remember that analysis of where the j6 rioters came from? Mostly from places with quickly declining white populations. They feel they are losing their nation and went to dc to take it back. the klan and proud boys knew trump represented racial politics in effect and saw him as one of their own.
I only read it once, and it is dense material that requires more thought than I've given it. But what I'm reading is that the insurrectionist predominantly came from urban/city areas which Pape finds surprising. I don't think it's that surprising (people with more means to travel, people more likely into politics).
When he gets to the point your posted about insurrectionists coming from counties with white percentage population decline (not real number decline), it just looks to me like he tossed in that factor/variable out of nowhere (its only previously mentioned in the Intro), didn't consider any similar ones, and never really explained the correlation (or provided the numbers, as far as I can tell). What stands out to me is that insurrectionists mostly come from cities, and cities have the larger declines in percentage white population than rural areas, and Pape doesn't account for that as a characteristic of all cities. For example, you could just as easily conclude that insurrectionists came from areas with more pollution, or more bars, or more social services, or more crime, or more Democrats or any other characteristics of a city compared to rural areas, and conclude that was what was driving them goons to get all jacked up and bust into the capitol for Trump.
But yes, it's an interesting study and something to think about. I can't say he's wrong, it just looks incomplete was my impression after one review.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.